Progression of adenomyosis: Rate and associated factors.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the rate of disease progression and the factors associated with such progression in patients with an ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis. METHODS: This was a single center, prospective, observational, cohort study performed at a tertiary referral center. Patients who obtained an ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis from May 2022 to August 2022 were recruited. Demographic, clinical and ultrasound data were recorded at the first visit (T0) and after 12 months (T1) for enrolled patients and compared between T0 and T1. The study population was divided in two groups according to progression (increase in uterine volume >20%) or stability/regression (decrease or increase in uterine volume ≤20%) of adenomyosis at T1. Primary study outcome was the rate of adenomyosis progression, while secondary study outcome was the association of adenomyosis progression with demographic and clinical factors. Post hoc subgroups analyses for primary and secondary study outcomes were performed based on hormonal therapy (untreated and treated). RESULTS: A total of 221 patients were enrolled in the study, with no significant difference in terms of baseline data among the two study groups and no patients were lost to follow-up. The overall rate of adenomyosis progression was 21.3% (47/221 patients). The rate was 30.77% in hormonally untreated women, and 18.34% in hormonally treated women. Progression was associated with the presence of focal adenomyosis of the outer myometrium (P = 0.037), moderate to severe dysmenorrhea (P = 0.001), chronic pelvic pain (P = 0.05), dyschezia (P = 0.05), and worsening of chronic pelvic pain (P = 0.04) at T1. CONCLUSION: Adenomyosis showed a rate of disease progression of 21.3% at the 12-month follow-up (30.77% in hormonally untreated women, and 18.34% in hormonally treated women). The presence and/or worsening of painful symptoms, such as severe dysmenorrhea, dyschezia and chronic pelvic pain, as well as the presence focal adenomyosis of the outer myometrium, might help identify patients at higher risk of disease progression and tailor their follow-up.

Prevalence of sonographic signs in women with uterine sarcoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of sonographic signs in women with uterine sarcoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Five electronic databases were searched from inception to June 2022 for all studies allowing calculation of the prevalence of sonographic signs in women with uterine sarcoma. Pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals was calculated for each sonographic sign and was a priori defined as "very high" when it was ≥ 80%, "high" when it ranged from 80% to 70%, and less relevant when it was ≤ 70%. RESULTS: 6 studies with 317 sarcoma patients were included. The pooled prevalence was: · 25.0% (95%CI:15.4-37.9%) for absence of visibility of the myometrium. · 80.5% (95%CI:74.8-85.2%) for solid component. · 78.3% (95%CI:59.3-89.9%) for inhomogeneous echogenicity of solid component. · 47.9% (95%CI:41.1-54.8%) for cystic areas. · 80.7% (95%CI:68.3-89.0%) for irregular walls of cystic areas. · 72.3% (95%CI:16.7-97.2%) for anechoic cystic areas. · 54.8% (95%CI:34.0-74.1%) for absence of shadowing. · 73.5% (95%CI:43.3-90.9%) for absence of calcifications. · 48.7% (95%CI:18.6-79.8%) for color score 3 or 4. · 47.3% (95%CI:37.0-57.8%) for irregular tumor borders. · 45.4% (95%CI:27.6-64.3%) for endometrial cavity not visualizable. · 10.9% (95%CI:3.5-29.1%) for free pelvic fluid. · 6.4% (95%CI:1.1-30.2%) for ascites. · 21.2% (95%CI:2.1-76.8%) for intracavitary process. · 81.5% (95%CI:56.1-93.8%) for singular lesion.. CONCLUSION: Solid component, irregular walls of cystic areas, and singular lesions are signs with very high prevalence, while inhomogeneous echogenicity of solid component, anechoic cystic areas, and absence of calcifications are signs with high prevalence. The remaining signs were less relevant.

Race and ethnicity reporting in endometrial cancer literature.

OBJECTIVES: There is evidence that there are differences in survival outcomes among patients with endometrial cancer of different ethnic groups. We aimed to assess the quantity and quality of race/ethnicity reporting in the literature on endometrial cancer published from January 2020 to December 2020. METHODS: In this systematic review, electronic searches of PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were performed for all articles published in 2020. A total of 3330 articles were reviewed, of which 949 (35%) peer-reviewed human-based articles focusing on endometrial cancer were included. Non-research-focused articles, review articles, meta-analyses, case reports, and non-human studies were excluded. We analyzed the proportion of studies reporting race/ethnicity and assessed the quality of reporting with regard to the adherence to the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations. We evaluated the influence of study characteristics on race/ethnicity reporting and compared articles published in journals which adhere to the ICMJE recommendations against those that did not explicitly state that they did. RESULTS: Of the 949 (28.5%) included articles, 166 (17.5%) reported race/ethnicity of patients, with low quality of reporting. The reporting rate of race/ethnicity was similar when comparing articles from ICMJE and non-ICMJE journals (62 (20.4%) vs 104 (16.1%); p=0.11), prospective versus retrospective studies (53 (22.7%) vs 113 (15.8%); p=0.02), and national versus international studies (147 (17.5%) vs 19 (17.4%); p=0.99). Studies performed in the WHO region of Americas were significantly more consistent in reporting race compared with other regions (119 (44.7%) vs 23 (6.8%) European, 2 (7.4%) Eastern Mediterranean, 21 (7.1%) Western Pacific, 0 (0%) South-East Asia; p<0.001). Female corresponding authors were significantly more consistent in reporting race than male authors (94 (22.5%) vs 72 (13.6%); p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Human-based articles focusing on endometrial cancer have a low frequency and quality of race/ethnicity reporting, even in journals claiming to follow ICMJE recommendations.

Updates and Controversies of Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Gynecologic Surgery.

minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the standard approach to performance of several gynecologic procedures, including hysterectomy, gynecologic cancer staging procedures, myomectomy, pelvic organ prolapse repair, and select adnexal procedures. Robotic-assisted surgery, a computer-based MIS approach, has been adopted widely in the United States and several other countries. Robotics may offer technological and ergonomic benefits that overcome limitations associated with conventional laparoscopy; however, it is not clear that reported claims of superiority translate into improved gynecologic patient outcomes compared with other MIS approaches. This review critically appraises the evolving role, benefits, limitations, and controversies of robotic-assisted surgery utilization in benign and oncologic gynecology settings.

Biodegradable wafers releasing Temozolomide and Carmustine for the treatment of brain cancer.

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) has few clinically approved therapeutic regimens. One of these therapeutic options includes placing biodegradable wafers releasing BCNU (Gliadel®) into the tumor bed at the time of surgical removal of the tumor. Due to the significant benefit this polymer technology has had clinically, we have prepared wafers releasing Temozolomide (TMZ), an anticancer drug used systemically for treating GBM. TMZ delivered via polymer wafer could be used as a complementary treatment with or as an alternative to Gliadel®. TMZ is an alkylating agent which is water soluble. To remain comparable with the preclinical studies that led to Gliadel® the same size of wafers were formulated with TMZ. Wafers were loaded with 50% w/w TMZ in poly(lactic acid-glycolic acid) (PLGA) and showed reliable release of high dose TMZ for a period of 4 weeks. To achieve this 30-day release of the highly water soluble drug, we developed an encapsulation method, where the drug powder was first coated with the polymer to form core-shell particles in which the coating shell served as a rate controlling membrane for the drug particles. Wafers were also made with a co-loading of TMZ and BCNU. All wafers were tested in vivo by treating an intracranial 9 L gliosarcoma model in F344 rats. Rats that were either untreated or treated with blank wafer died within 11 days while the median survival for rats treated with systemic TMZ was 18 days. The group that received the BCNU alone wafer had a median survival of 15 days, the group that received the TMZ wafer alone had a median survival of 19 days, and the group treated with the BCNU-TMZ wafer had a median survival of 28 days with 25% of the animals living long term (p < .0038 vs. Control; p < .001 vs. Blank Polymer). These findings demonstrate the potential of this newly designed wafer for treating GBM. Moreover, this concept, can pave the way for other drug combinations that may improve the clinical application of numerous agents to treat solid tumors.