Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ischemia-modified albumin and echocardiography in patients with acute chest pain.

BACKGROUND: Several imaging tests and biomarkers have been proposed for the identification of patients with unstable angina among those presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain. Preliminary data suggest that ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) may represent a potentially useful biomarker in these patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare IMA and echocardiography in excluding unstable angina in patients with acute chest pain. METHODS: Thirty-three patients (mean [± SD] age 59.8±10.8 years; 28 men) presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain lasting <3 h suggestive of acute coronary syndrome, with normal or non-diagnostic electrocardiograms, and creatine kinase MB and troponin levels within the normal range, were included in the present study. RESULTS: After further diagnostic evaluation, five patients (15.2%) were diagnosed with unstable angina. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive (NPV) value of echocardiography for diagnosing unstable angina was 60.0%, 89.3%, 50.0% and 92.6%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for diagnosing unstable angina based on the serum IMA levels was 0.193 (95% CI 0.047 to 0.339; P<0.05). Based on ROC curve analysis, serum IMA levels ≥31.95 IU/mL yielded the optimal combination of sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing unstable angina. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and NPV of serum IMA levels ≥31.95 IU/mL for diagnosing unstable angina was 40.0%, 28.6%, 9.1% and 72.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of serum IMA levels appears to represent a useful tool for excluding unstable angina in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain. Moreover, IMA shows an NPV that is comparable with echocardiography.

The effects of vitamin E-coated membrane dialyzer compared to simvastatin in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the effects of the use of vitamin E-coated membrane (VEM) dialyzer in comparison to simvastatin on markers of chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and endothelial cell apoptosis in ten patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD), aiming at distinguishing the different treatment effects and their time sequence on these pathogenetic routes. METHODS: Ten HD patients were sequentially submitted to a 6-month treatment with the use of VEM and 10 mg of simvastatin daily, interrupted by a 3-month washout period. At baseline, at 3, and 6 months of each trial, serum C-reactive protein (CRP), apolipoprotein (Apo) A1 and B, lipoprotein-a [Lp(a)], high-sensitivity interleukin-6 (hsIL-6), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), soluble E-selectin (sE-selectin), soluble Fas (sFas), soluble Fas ligand (sFasL), and plasma oxidized low-density lipoproteins (oxLDL) levels were determined. RESULTS: VEM treatment resulted in a significant decrease in CRP, IL-6, sICAM-1 at 3 months, and oxLDL at 6 months, compared to baseline. Simvastatin resulted in a significant decrease in CRP, which correlated with decreases in both total (r = 0.87, p < 0.05) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, IL-6, sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, oxLDL, and sFas at 6 months, compared to baseline. Simvastatin effects on sVCAM-1 (mean difference = 652 ng/mL; 95% CI = 294 to 2686; p < 0.05) and sFas (mean difference = 1284 pg/mL; 95% CI = 510 to 1910; p < 0.05) differed significantly from the corresponding VEM effects. CONCLUSIONS: The 6-month use of VEM resulted in more direct and immediate anti-inflammatory effects compared with those caused by the 6-month treatment with simvastatin. Simvastatin caused a more intense decrease in the markers of inflammation, which was in part correlated with its lipid-lowering effects.

Effects of simvastatin on markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelial cell apoptosis in patients on chronic hemodialysis.

AIM: We investigated the effects of simvastatin on markers of inflammation, oxidative stress and endothelial cell apoptosis in hyperlipidemic endstage renal disease patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD). METHODS: In 25 hyperlipidemic HD patients who received 10 mg of simvastatin for 6 months and another 25 controls, the extended lipid profile and serum hsIL-6, MCP-1, sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, and sE-selectin, plasma oxLDL, and serum sFas and sFasL levels were determined at baseline, 3 months and 6 months. In 18 patients of the simvastatin group, the expression of CD14, CD16, CD62L and CD64 on monocyfes was determined with flow cytometry. RESULT: Simvastatin treatment resulted in significant reductions in serum lipid levels at 3 months and beyond, compared to at baseline. Moreover, at 6 months, simvastatin caused a significant reduction in CRP (p < 0.001), which correlated to the decrease in total and LDL cholesterol levels, as well as a significant reduction in IL-6 (p=0.001), sICAM-1 (p < 0.001), sVCAM-1 (p < 0.001), oxLDL (p=0.001), sFas (p=0.02) and CD14 expression (p < 0.001), compared to baseline values. No significant changes in the controls were noticed during the study. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, in hyperlipidemic HD patients, simvastatin treatment resulted in a significant reduction in markers of endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial cell apoptosis and peripheral blood monocyte stimulation. The reduction in CRP appears to be related to the lipid-lowering effects of simvastatin.