Right ventricular dysfunction and impaired right ventricular-pulmonary arterial coupling in paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis.

AIMS: Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (pLFLG AS) may represent a diagnostic challenge, and its pathophysiology is complex. While left ventricular (LV) systolic function is preserved, right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and consecutive LV underfilling may contribute to low-flow and reduced stroke volume index, and to adverse outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential role of RVD in pLFLG AS, and to assess the impact of pre-procedural RVD on clinical outcomes after TAVI in patients with pLFLG AS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Out of 2739 native AS patients, who received TAVI at the University of Cologne Heart Center between March 2013 and June 2021, 114 patients displayed pLFLG AS and were included in this study. Right ventricular (RV) function was assessed by transthoracic echocardiography, and a fractional area change (FAC) ≤35% and/or a tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) <18 mm determined RVD. In addition, the TAPSE/systolic pulmonary artery pressure ratio (TAPSE/sPAP) was monitored as a measure of RV-pulmonary arterial (PA) coupling. An impaired FAC and TAPSE was present in 21.9% and 45.6% of patients, respectively, identifying RVD in 50.0%. RVD (p = 0.016), reduced FAC (p = 0.049), reduced TAPSE (p = 0.035) and impaired RV-PA coupling (TAPSE/sPAP ratio <0.31 mm/mmHg; p = 0.009) were associated with significantly higher all-cause mortality compared to patients with normal RV function. After adjustment for sex, age, body mass index, EuroSCORE II, previous myocardial infarction and mitral regurgitation, independent predictors for all-cause mortality were FAC, sPAP, TAPSE/sPAP ratio, right atrial area, RV diameter and tricuspid regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: Adverse RV remodelling, RVD and impaired RV-PA coupling provide an explanation for low-flow and reduced stroke volume index in a subset of patients with pLFLG AS, and are associated with excess mortality after TAVI.

[Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease (group 2)]. / Pulmonale Hypertonie im Zusammenhang mit Linksherzerkrankungen (Gruppe 2).

Patients with left heart disease (LHD) often display pulmonary hypertension (PH), which impacts morbidity and mortality. The pathophysiology of PH is complex and entails pulmonary congestion due to elevated left-sided filling pressures, pulmonary vasoconstriction as well as vascular remodeling. The recent ESC/ERS Guidelines on pulmonary hypertension updated the hemodynamic definitions of pulmonary hypertension in general, and the subclassification of post-capillary PH. This review summarizes recent advances in the diagnostic work-up and management strategies of PH associated with LHD. Specifically, we summarize revisited hemodynamic definitions and the characteristics of isolated post-capillary PH (IpcPH) and combined post- and pre-capillary PH (CpcPH). Furthermore, we review the current knowledge on the pathogenesis of PH-LHD, the prognostic relevance of hemodynamic parameters, and the management strategies, differentiating between treatment of the underlying left heart disease and therapies targeting the pulmonary circulation. The article emphasises the need for precise diagnostic work-up and individualized treatment strategies in patients with PH-LHD.

Pulmonary hypertension associated with left heart disease.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common condition in patients with left heart disease (LHD) that is highly relevant for morbidity and mortality. While post-capillary in nature, the pathophysiology of PH in patients with LHD (heart failure/cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease; other: congenital/acquired) is complex, and decisions about management strategies are challenging. Recently, the updated European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of PH revisited hemodynamic definitions and the sub-classification of post-capillary PH, and provided numerous new recommendations on the diagnosis and management of PH associated with various types of LHD. Here, we review several novel aspects that focus on: (a) updated hemodynamic definitions, including the distinction between isolated post-capillary PH (IpcPH) and combined post- and pre-capillary PH (CpcPH); (b) the pathogenesis of PH-LHD, considering various components contributing to PH, such as pulmonary congestion, vasoconstriction, and vascular remodeling; (c) the prognostic relevance of PH and hemodynamic markers; (d) the diagnostic approach to PH-LHD; (e) management strategies in PH-LHD, distinguishing between targeting the underlying left heart condition, the pulmonary circulation, and/or impaired right ventricular function. In conclusion, precise clinical and hemodynamic characterization and detailed phenotyping are essential for prognostication and the management of patients with PH-LHD.