Peritoneal dialysis catheter removal at the time or after kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: An increasing number of patients treated with peritoneal dialysis eventually undergo kidney transplantation. Owing to opposing reports, we aimed to find evidence about the best time for peritoneal dialysis catheter removal in transplant patients. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and random effects meta-analysis of non-randomized studies of intervention comparing patients with peritoneal dialysis catheters left in place or removed during kidney transplantation in regard to the need for dialysis and occurrence of catheter-related complications. We searched (last update on 8 December 2021) PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for eligible studies. ROBINS-I tool and funnel plot asymmetry analysis were used to assess the quality of included articles. RESULTS: Eight observational studies were evaluated. Five of them, which involved 338 patients, were included in a meta-analysis. All were at moderate to serious risk of bias. The odds of needing dialysis are more than twice as high for patients with peritoneal dialysis catheters left in situ (pooled odds ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 4.73; I2 = 0%). No statistically significant difference was noted when adult and pediatric subgroups were compared (Q = 0.13, P = .720). More individuals with catheters left in place required dialysis (pooled prevalence, 20.9%; 95% CI, 13.6 to 30.7%; I2 = 59% vs. 12.4%; 95% CI, 5.6 to 25.2%; I2 = 0%) and experienced catheter-related infections. CONCLUSION: Available evidence is scarce. Unless new data from a randomized controlled trial are available, the dilemma of peritoneal dialysis catheter removal cannot be solved. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO Protocol ID: CRD42020207707.

Kidney Transplantation in a Patient With Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a rare autosomal dominant genetic disease caused by mutations of either of 2 genes, TSC1 and TSC2. Renal manifestations include angiomyolipomas (AMLs), multiple cysts, and renal cell carcinoma. AMLs increase bleeding tendency and the risk of renal insufficiency which end-stage develops in 1% of affected patients. CASE REPORT: A 38-year-old woman suffering from TSC since early childhood has developed multiple complications associated with this disease. The patient was diagnosed with brain tumor-giant cell astrocytoma-which was removed in 1992. In 2006, right nephrectomy was performed due to the unsuccessful right renal artery embolization after the massive hemorrhage into the AML. Moreover, the right idiopathic pneumothorax occurred twice. Therefore, the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and pleurodesis were conducted (2006, 2013). The patient is intellectually disabled and unable to make decisions on her own. Her legal guardians (parents) make all decisions associated with her treatment. Diagnostic and therapeutic procedures demanding cooperation were conducted under anesthesia. Because of end-stage renal failure, the patient required the renal replacement therapy (RRT). Preemptive kidney transplantation (KTx) was the best solution for this patient. Procedures such as hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis were infeasible to perform due to the intellectual disability that inhibits essential cooperation. During KTx qualification tests, the expanding AML with risk of hemorrhage was noticed. The patient was qualified for simultaneous left nephrectomy and KTx from the living donor (her father). The surgery was performed on the 2nd of June 2020. The patient is looked after by her parents, stays in good general condition. The patient's creatinine level is maintained at 0.6 to 0.8 mg/dL. CONCLUSION: Patients with significant intellectual disability that prevents maintaining conscious cooperation who require RRT must have individually adjusted therapy. In the case of the presented patient, it was decided to perform the preemptive kidney transplantation from her determined father.

Single-center experience with perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical site infections in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Infections in kidney transplant recipients are particularly challenging owing to the immunosuppressive treatment, usually long history of chronic illness, comorbidities and prior exposures to antibiotics. Among the most common complications early after surgery are surgical site infections. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and evaluate epidemiological data regarding surgical site infections. Moreover, we were able to compare the current results with historical data from our institution when different perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was practiced. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control study in a group of 254 deceased donor renal graft recipients transplanted in a single Central European institution. We evaluated epidemiological findings and resistance patterns of pathogens causing surgical site infections. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine risk factors for surgical site infections. RESULTS: We revealed no differences in baseline characteristics between patients with and without surgical site infections. Ten surgical site infections (3.9%) were diagnosed (six superficial incisional, two deep incisional, and two organ/space). Eight species (19 strains) were identified, most of which were multi-drug resistant (63%). The most common was extended-spectrum ß-lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (26%). We showed that statistically significant differences were present between reoperated and non-reoperated patients (adjusted odds ratio: 6.963, 95% confidence interval 1.523-31.842, P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: Reoperation is an individual risk factor for surgical site infection after kidney transplantation. According to our experience, cefazolin-based prophylaxis can be safe and is associated with relatively low prevalence of surgical site infections.

Prophylactic intra-abdominal drainage following kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: An ongoing debate concerns the need for routine placement of prophylactic intra-abdominal drains following kidney transplantation. <br/><br/>Aim: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether such an approach brings any advantages in the prevention of perirenal transplant fluid collection, surgical site infection, lymphocele, hematoma, urinoma, wound dehiscence, graft loss, and need for reoperation. <br/><br/>Methods: We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis of non-randomized studies of intervention comparing drained and drain-free adult renal graft recipients regarding perirenal transplant fluid collection and other wound complications. ROBINS-I tool and funnel plot asymmetry analysis were used to assess the risk of bias. <br/><br/>Results: Five studies at moderate to critical risk of bias were included. A total of 2094 renal graft recipients were evaluated. Our analysis revealed no significant differences between drained and drain-free patients regarding perirenal transplant fluid collection (pooled odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.28-2.17; I 2 = 72%), surgical site infection (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.11-24.88; I 2 = 80%), lymphocele (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.02-15.27; I 2 = 0%), hematoma (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.12-3.99; I 2 = 71%), and wound dehiscence (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.21-2.70; I 2 = 0%). There was insufficient data concerning urinoma, graft loss, and need for reoperation. <br/><br/>Conclusions: The available evidence is weak. Our findings show that the use of intra-abdominal drains after kidney transplantation seems to have neither beneficial nor harmful effects on perirenal transplant fluid collection and other wound complications. The present study does not support the routine placement of surgical drains after kidney transplantation. <i>In this systematic review and meta-analysis we summarize the most up-to-date evidence for and against the routine use of intra-abdominal drain following renal transplantation.</i>.

Outcomes of ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with hepatic tumors cannot benefit from resection owing to the difficult anatomic sites of their lesions. Some of these patients might be eligible for ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation. This procedure consists of complete hepatectomy, extracorporeal liver resection, and autotransplantation of the remnant liver. METHODS: Four databases were searched for studies reporting cases of ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation. Outcomes of this procedure were evaluated by meta-analysis of proportions with random effects model and individual participant data analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-three studies were assessed. Meta-analysis revealed an R0 resection rate of 93.4% (95% confidence interval: 81.0-97.9%, I2 = 0%), a frequency of major surgical complications of 24.5% (95% confidence interval, 16.9-34.3%, I2 = 26%), a 30-day mortality of 9.5% (95% confidence interval: 5.9-14.9%, I2 = 0%), and a 1-year survival of 78.4% (95% confidence interval: 62.2-88.8%, I2 = 64%). We were able to obtain the individual participant data in 244 patients; R0 resection was achieved in 98.6%, with no obvious difference between analyzed subgroups. The 30-day mortality and 1-year survivals were 7.9% and 82.1%, respectively. For groups with malignant and nonmalignant tumors, the 30-day mortalities were 11.3% vs. 6.3% (P = .181), and 1-year survivals were 65.0% vs. 89.7% (P < .001). When comparing those with malignant versus those with nonmalignant lesions, major surgical complications occurred in 50.0% vs. 21.0%; P < .001). Regression analysis revealed that outcomes of patients with benign tumors were better compared with those with malignant tumors (1-year survival, odds ratio: 4.629; 95% confidence interval: 2.181-10.097, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Ex vivo liver resection and autotransplantation facilitates radical treatment in selected patients with conventionally unresectable hepatic tumors and normal liver function. The outcomes of treatment of malignant lesions appear to be less satisfactory.

Right posterior segment graft for living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review.

The clinical significance of the right posterior segment (RPS) graft in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is unknown because of its limited use and technical concerns. This study aimed to review published studies investigating outcomes of RPS grafts. The systematic literature search was conducted to retrieve data from Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar. Among the 388 articles, six retrospective studies from Asian countries were included. The overall incidences of major and minor complications after RPS graft procurement were 5.6% and 34.6%, respectively and no donor deaths were reported. RPS graft recipients had the following postoperative complications: overall mortality rate, 14.5%; bile leakage, 8.7%, biliary stenosis, 18.8%, hepatic artery thrombosis, 8.7%, and liver re-transplantation, 2.9%. The RPS graft can be considered as an option for a living liver graft respecting donor safety under strict selection criteria and surgical strategy. The precise evaluation and understanding of anatomical variations and volumetric analyses is critical for selecting donors and planning the surgical strategy in the RPS grafts procurement. The RPS grafts procurement requires carefully dissection of the hepatic artery and portal vein, safely confirmation of the bile duct, and precisely parenchymal transection. However, further experience is needed to clarify the significance of the RPS graft in LDLT. The special technical requirements should limit this donor procedure to centers with a high level of experience in LDLT.

Liver retransplantation in adult recipients: analysis of a 38-year experience in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Liver retransplantation (re-LT) accounts for up to 22% after primary liver transplantation (LT), and using donor livers for retransplantation can only be justified by successful outcomes. METHODS: A total of 2,387 adult recipients with 2,778 LT, between 1979 and 2017, were analyzed to determine risk factors and outcome of re-LT in the Netherlands. RESULTS: Of 2,778 LT, 336 (12.1%) were first, 43 (1.5%) were second, and 12 (0.5%) were third or fourth re-LT. The 5-year patient survival for primary LT, and first, second, and third or fourth re-LT were 74.0%, 70.8%, 63.3%, and 57.1%, respectively (P = 0.10). Recipient age (≤60 years) (OR 1.96, P < 0.001), era (1979-2006) (OR 1.56, P = 0.003), donor after circulatory death (DCD) (OR 1.96, P < 0.001), and cold ischemia time (CIT) (>9 h) (OR 1.42, P = 0.007) were significant risk factors for retransplantation after primary LT. CONCLUSIONS: Recipient age, era, DCD, and prolonged CIT were identified as parameters for retransplantation. The outcome after the first re-LT was good, and comparable to those of primary transplants. Survival after multiple re-LT was not significantly different from the first retransplant group, legitimizing third and fourth re-LT to well-selected patients.

Prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in patients undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The clinical value of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increased. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically review the association between the CONUT score and outcomes in patients undergoing hepatectomy for HCC. METHODS: Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar were systematically searched. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted to examine the prognostic value of the CONUT score in HCC patients. RESULTS: A total of five studies including 4679 patients were found to be eligible and analyzed in the meta-analysis. The CONUT score was significantly associated with overall survival (HR 1.78, 95%CI = 1.20-2.64, P = 0.004, I2 = 79%), recurrence-free survival (HR 1.34, 95%CI = 1.17-1.53, P < 0.001, I2 = 16%) and postoperative major complications (OR 1.85, 95%CI: 1.19-2.87, P = 0.006, I2 = 72%) in HCC patients. Moreover, the CONUT score was associated with the Child-Pugh classification, liver cirrhosis, ICGR15, and tumor differentiation. However, it was not associated with tumor size, tumor number, and microvascular invasion. CONCLUSIONS: The CONUT score is an independent prognostic indicator of the prognosis and is associated with postoperative major complications and hepatic functional reserve in HCC patients.

Current evidence of nutritional therapy in pancreatoduodenectomy: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

AIM: Evidence of nutritional therapies in pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) has been shown. However, few studies focus on the association between different nutritional therapies and outcomes. The aim of this review was to summarize the current evidence of nutritional therapies such as enteral nutrition (EN), immunonutrition, and synbiotics on postoperative outcomes after PD. METHODS: A systematic literature search of Embase, Medline Ovid, and Cochrane CENTRAL was done to summarize the available evidence, including randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses and reviews, regarding nutritional therapy in PD. RESULTS: A total of 20 randomized controlled trials were included in this review. Safety and tolerability of EN in PD was shown. Giving postoperative EN can shorten length of stay compared to parenteral nutrition; however, the effect of EN on postoperative complications remains controversial. Postoperative EN should be given only on selective indications rather than routinely used, and preoperative EN is indicated only in patients with severe malnutrition. Giving preoperative immunonutrition is considered to reduce the incidence of infectious complications; however, evidence level is moderate and recommendation grade is weak. The beneficial effect of perioperative synbiotics on postoperative infectious complications is limited. Furthermore, the effectiveness of other nutritional supplements remains unclear. CONCLUSION: Recently, evidence of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in PD has been increasing. Early oral intake with systematic nutritional support is an important aspect of the ERAS concept. Future well-designed studies should investigate the impact of systematic nutritional therapies on outcomes following PD.

Reoperation in Early Kidney Post-transplant Period as a Strong Risk Factor of Surgical Site Infection Occurrence.

BACKGROUND: One of the most common infective complications after kidney transplant (KTx) is surgical site infection (SSI). Providing indications of improvement of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) and allowing the characterization of risk factors are critical to reduce SSI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the SSI risk factors and impact of reoperation in the early post-transplant period on SSI occurrence and assess if standard PAP in those cases is a best consideration. METHODS: Between April 2014 and October 2015, a total of 236 KTxs were performed in our center. Deceased donor data, recipient data, and data related to surgical procedures were collected. RESULTS: Surgical site infections were reported in 5.6% (12/214) of patients. Seven patients were diagnosed as having superficial SSI (7/12; 58.3%), 2 with deep SSI (2/12; 16.6%), and 4 with organ-specific SSI (4/12; 33.3%). Extended criteria donor-related transplant, cold ischemia time > 22 hours, dialysis period > 30 months, recipient age older than 45 years, recipient body mass index > 27, induction therapy prior to transplant, diabetes prior to transplant, and ≥ 1 reoperation during 30 days of observation were independent risk factors of SSI occurrence. A total of 19 reoperations were performed in 17 patients. In 8 of all 12 patients with SSI diagnosis, the reoperation was performed (66.7%). In 202 patients of non-SSI patients, only 9 reoperations were performed (4.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Early reoperation after Ktx is a strong risk factor of SSI occurrence. There is a probability that > 4 SSI risk factors and reoperation in the early post-transplant period could require different and more aggressive proceeding, as standard PAP in those cases is insufficient.

Should Immunosuppression After Kidney Transplant Be Adjusted Based on Renal Resistance During Pretransplant Hypothermic Machine Perfusion?

BACKGROUND: The hypothermic machine perfusion reduces delayed graft function after kidney transplant and allows, to some extent, predicting early graft function. However, it is difficult to identify exact perfusion criteria with which to exclude kidneys from transplant or modify post-transplant care. The aim of this study was to analyze whether renal resistance during the fourth hour of hypothermic machine perfusion is useful in the prediction of graft survival and acute rejection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data on pretransplant hypothermic machine perfusion parameters of 407 transplanted kidneys were available. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to find an optimal cutoff value of ratio for predicting a higher risk class of considered group of patients. According to this, patients were divided into 2 groups: those who received kidneys with renal resistance lower than 0.19 mm Hg/mL/min (R1; n = 187) and those who received kidneys with renal resistance equal to or higher than 0.19 mm Hg/mL/min (R2; n = 220). Within R2, we additionally analyzed 2 subgroups: patients who received induction therapy (R2-Ind+; n = 124) and those who did not received induction therapy (R2-Ind-; n = 96). RESULTS: Acute rejection in R1 within 1 month post transplant was 2-fold lower compared with R2 and was 6.4% vs 13.1% (P = .03), respectively. One-year graft survival was higher in R1 compared with R2 and was 94.6% vs 88.5% (P = .03), respectively. Acute rejection in the R2-Ind+ subgroup within 1 month post transplant was 2.46-fold lower compared with the R2-Ind- subgroup and was 8% vs 19.7% (P = .01), respectively. CONCLUSION: Immunosuppression treatment after transplant should be adjusted to perfusion parameters.

Predictors of Acute Kidney Injury in Deceased Kidney Donors After Brain Death.

BACKGROUND: Donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) are generally accepted as a valuable source of kidneys for transplant. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of developing AKI based on deceased kidney donor parameters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 162 kidneys procured from deceased donors after brain death were collected. These included clinical characteristics of donors and histologic assessment in organ biopsy specimens. The donors' kidney terminal function was classified according to the Acute Kidney Injury Network criteria. All biopsies were performed with the use of a 16G automatic needle, and the 20-mm tissue specimen was available in all cases. Biopsy specimens were secured and prepared in a routine way with hematoxylin and eosin. The presence of chronic changes was analyzed according to the Banff 2009 classification by 1 experienced nephropathologist. The logistic regression model was used to assess the risk of AKI regarding donor characteristics and histologic findings. RESULTS: There were 50 kidneys (30.9%) with AKI identified. The risk of AKI increased with donor age (P = .002; odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), body mass index (P = .003; OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01-1.09), and male sex (P = .001; OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.31-2.27). Regarding the histologic findings, the interstitial fibrosis presence was a risk factor of AKI (P = .004; OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: Older donor age, male sex, higher body mass index, and presence of interstitial fibrosis in kidney graft biopsy specimen are risk factors of AKI.

Time of Cold Storage Prior to Start of Hypothermic Machine Perfusion and Its Influence on Graft Survival.

BACKGROUND: Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) has become a standard method of preservation for kidneys procured from expanded-criteria donors and donors after cardiac death. There are different systems and approaches to the HMP preservation period, with cold storage prior to HMP sometimes taking several hours. This study evaluated whether the time at which kidneys receive HMP had any influence on the outcomes of kidney transplantation. METHODS: In this analysis, patient and graft survival were evaluated over a 1-year post-transplantation period. Patients who received HMP kidneys (n = 379) were divided into 2 groups: those who received kidneys with a cold ischemia time (CIT) prior to HMP <295 minutes (group G1; n = 254) and those who received kidneys with CIT prior to HMP >295 minutes (group G2; n = 125). RESULTS: Delayed graft function was observed in 31.8% (81/254) of patients in group G1 vs 46.4% (58/125) of patients in group G2 (P = .007). One-year graft survival was statistically higher in the group G1 (93.2%; 233/254) vs group G2 (86.5%; 105/125, P = .029). Mean 1-year estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly better in the group G1. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, introduction of HMP up to 295 minutes from procurement led to better early and 1-year graft results. Kidneys should receive HMP as soon as possible after retrieval, preferably during procurement.

Prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, the clinical evidence of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score has increased in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the association between the preoperative CONUT score and outcomes in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC). METHODS: A systematic literature search for studies reporting the prognostic impact of the CONUT score in patients with GC was conducted. Meta-analyses of survival, postoperative outcomes, and postoperative clinico-pathological parameters were conducted. RESULTS: Five studies with 2482 patients were found to be eligible and subsequently reviewed and analyzed. The CONUT score was significantly associated with overall survival (HR 1.85, 95%CI 1.38-2.48, P <  0.001), cancer-specific survival (HR 2.56, 95%CI 1.24-5.28, P = 0.01) and recurrence/relapse-free survival (HR 1.43, 95%CI 1.12-1.82, P = 0.004). Moreover, the CONUT score was associated with the incidence of postoperative complications (OR 1.39, P = 0.003) and mortality (OR 6.97, P = 0.04), and clinico-pathological parameters (T factor [OR 1.75, P <  0.001], N factor [OR 1.51, P <  0.001], TNM stage [OR 1.73, P <  0.001], and microvascular invasion [OR 1.50, P = 0.006]), but not with tumor differentiation (OR 0.85, P = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: The preoperative CONUT score is an independent prognostic indicator of survival and postoperative complications, and is associated with clinico-pathological parameters in patients with GC.

Grafts from selected deceased donors over 80 years old can safely expand the number of liver transplants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to present the outcome of deceased adult liver transplantation from octogenarian (≥80 years old) donors compared to younger grafts. METHODS: A systematic search was performed on six databases to identify all available original papers that report the outcome of adult recipients who underwent liver transplantation from a deceased octogenarian donor. RESULTS: Overall, 39,034 liver transplantations from 12 studies were reported with 789 (2.02%) cases receiving grafts from octogenarian donors. Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference regarding the one, three, and five-year graft and patient survival between the recipients of livers <80 years old and octogenarian grafts. There were significantly more episodes of biliary complications in the recipients of octogenarian grafts (34/459; 7.4%) in comparison to the recipients of livers <80 years old (372/37074; 1.0%) (OR 0.53; 95% CI = 0.35-0.81; P 0.004; I2 = 0%). The incidence of primary non-function, vascular complications and re-transplantation did not differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The short- and medium-term graft and patient survival of octogenarian liver transplantation is not inferior compared to the liver transplantation with younger grafts, however with a higher rate of biliary complications.

Order of liver graft revascularization in deceased liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The ideal order for liver graft revascularization during liver transplantation remains unknown. The majority of liver transplant centers prefer portal venous reperfusion followed by arterial reperfusion to shorten the warm ischemia time. The aim of this study was to review the different revascularization techniques used in clinical liver transplantation to identify any potential clinical benefits. METHODS: A systematic search of 5 databases was performed to identify all available original articles that reported liver transplantation and compared different techniques of reperfusion. The primary outcomes were patient and graft survival. Secondary outcomes were defined by postreperfusion syndrome, primary nonfunction, vascular complications, biliary complications, and retransplantation. RESULTS: A total of 1,160 patients undergoing liver transplantation from 15 studies were included in this review and meta-analysis. There were no differences regarding the 1-year patient and graft survival for the revascularization techniques. The incidence of primary nonfunction, vascular complications, and retransplantation did not differ between the groups. Although there were no differences regarding biliary complications between the different groups, there were more nonanastomotic strictures in patients with initial portal revascularization (9%) compared with those with simultaneous revascularization (2%; risk ratio 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.14; P = .05; I2 = 51%). CONCLUSION: The order of liver graft revascularization does not influence patient and graft survival. Each revascularization technique offers potential benefits that can be used under specific clinical situations.

The Controlling Nutritional Status Score and Postoperative Complication Risk in Gastrointestinal and Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is associated with prognosis in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients, but the clinical significance of the CONUT score for postoperative short-term outcome remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the CONUT score on postoperative outcomes in patients with GI and hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cancers. We conducted a systematic literature search of Embase, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar. Meta-analyses were performed to estimate the pooled risk ratio (RR) for postoperative complications in patients with lower -CONUT score versus higher CONUT score. Furthermore, we explored the most appropriate cutoff value of the CONUT score to predict postoperative complications. Ten retrospective studies (5,138 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Patients with higher CONUT score had an increased risk of mortality (RR 5.38, 95% CI 2.19-13.2, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%), postoperative major complications (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.05-2.33, p= 0.03, I2 = 79%), and overall complications (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.16-1.63, p < 0.001, I2 = 6%). We found that the cutoff of CONUT ≤4 vs. CONUT ≥5 had the highest pooled RR compared with other cutoff values (RR 4.79, 95% CI 0.97-23.5, p= 0.05, I2 = 91%). In conclusion, the present study suggests that the preoperative CONUT score was associated with an increased risk of mortality and complications in GI and HPB surgical oncology. Patients with higher CONUT score as compared with those having a lower score had approximately a fivefold mortality risk and an increased risk up to 55% on major and overall complications after GI and HPB surgery. Our analysis indicates that the appropriate cutoff value of the CONUT score to predict postoperative major complications would be between 4 and 5. The preoperative evaluation of the CONUT score would be helpful for predicting the risk of postoperative outcomes.

Surgical Safety and Efficacy of Third Kidney Transplantation in the Ipsilateral Iliac Fossa.

BACKGROUND Kidney re-transplantation is a relevant option for patients who are returning to dialysis after graft failure. However, evidence is lacking to what extend a third kidney transplantation in the ipsilateral iliac fossa is safe and effective. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of third kidney transplantations in the ipsilateral iliac fossa compared to first and second ipsilateral fossa kidney transplantations. MATERIAL AND METHODS There were 2074 kidneys transplanted at the Erasmus MC Rotterdam and at the University Medical Centre Groningen. Donor, recipient, and surgical data were collected. The cohort was divided into 3 groups: recipients of a first graft (I KTx; n=1744), recipients of a second graft (II KTx; n=44), and recipients of a third graft (III KTx; n=7). RESULTS Recipients from the II KTx group had a significantly higher rate of primary non-function (PNF) compared to recipients in the I KTx group and recipients in the III KTx group (4.5% versus 0.7% and 0% respectively; P=0.006). The 1-year graft survival did not differ between groups: 96% for I KTx, 91% for II KTx, and 85% for III KTx (P=0.214). The 5-year graft survival did differ significantly between groups: 89% for I KTx, 82% for II KTx, and 68% for III KTx (P=0.029). There were no differences regards hospital stay and rate of complications between groups. CONCLUSIONS Third kidney transplantation in the ipsilateral iliac fossa is feasible and viable. Short-term results are comparable to the first and the second kidney transplantation, however, long-term results are inferior but acceptable compared to dialysis.

Successful transplantation of kidneys from deceased donors with terminal acute kidney injury.

BACKGROUND: There are many doubts with regards to accepting deceased kidneys with acute kidney injury (AKI) for transplantation. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to present the 5-years outcome of kidney transplantation cases where deceased donors developed AKI before organ procurement. METHODS: Two hundred twenty-six deceased renal transplants were analyzed. Data regarding donors and recipients were collected. Terminal AKI was defined as terminal serum creatinine concentration higher than 1.99 mg/dL and 66 such cases were diagnosed. All kidney transplant recipients were followed for 60 months. RESULTS: AKI group presented more episodes of delayed graft function (DGF) compared to the non-AKI group (56% vs 35%, p < .05). No differences were observed between the groups in the rate of acute rejection episodes, kidney function as well as patient and graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Transplants with AKI present more often DGF and comparable graft survival to transplants without AKI. Kidneys with AKI can be a valuable source of organs provided attentive selection and appropriate care of deceased donors.

Diagnostic utility of monitoring cytomegalovirus-specific immunity by QuantiFERON-cytomegalovirus assay in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Despite universal prophylaxis, late cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurs in a high proportion of kidney transplant recipients. We evaluated whether a specific viral T-cell response allows for the better identification of recipients who are at high risk of CMV infection after prophylaxis withdrawal. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in 19 pretransplant anti-CMV seronegative kidney graft recipients R- (18 from seropositive donors [D+] and one from a seronegative donor [D-]) and 67 seropositive recipients R(+) (59 from seropositive donors and eight from seronegative donors) who received antiviral prophylaxis with valganciclovir. The QuantiFERON-CMV (QF-CMV) assay was performed within the first and third months after transplantation. Blood samples were monitored for CMV DNAemia using a commercial quantitative nucleic acid amplification test (QNAT) that was calibrated to the World Health Organization International Standard. RESULTS: Twenty-one of the 86 patients (24%) developed CMV viremia after prophylaxis withdrawal within 12 months posttransplantation. In the CMV R(+) group, the QF-CMV assay yielded reactive results (QF-CMV[+]) in 51 of 67 patients (76%) compared with 7 of 19 patients (37%) in the CMV R(-) group (p = 0.001). In the CMV R(+) group, infection occurred in seven of 16 recipients (44%) who were QF-CMV(-) and eight of 51 recipients (16%) who were QF-CMV(+). In the CMV R(-) group, infection evolved in five of 12 recipients (42%) who were QF-CMV(-) and one of 7 recipients (14%) who were QF-CMV(+). No difference was found in the incidence of CMV infection stratified according to the QF-CMV results with regard to the recipients' pretransplant CMV IgG serology (p = 0.985). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in 15 of 36 patients (42%) with hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) 90 days posttransplantation compared with two of 34 patients (6%) without HGG (p = 0.0004). Cytomegalovirus infection occurred in seven of 13 patients (54%) with lymphocytopenia compared with 14 of 70 patients (20%) without lymphocytopenia (p = 0.015). The multivariate analysis revealed that the nonreactive QuantiFERON-CMV assay was an independent risk factor for postprophylaxis CMV infection. CONCLUSIONS: In kidney transplant recipients who received posttransplantation prophylaxis, negative QF-CMV results better defined the risk of CMV infection than initial CMV IgG status after prophylaxis withdrawal. Hypogammaglobulinemia and lymphocytopenia were risk factors for CMV infection.