RESUMO
INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND: In conventional linear accelerators, to obtain flat profiles leading to uniform dose distribution in homogeneous medium, the flattening filter is usually applied on the beam path. In recent years, to obtain higher dose rates, there have been the options of flattening filter free (FFF) beams and it has been noticed that these have many advantages. The aim of this study was to clearly underline the advantages and the drawbacks of flattened filter free (FFF) beams in comparison with the flattening filter (FF) beams for different clinical contexts (planning target volumes locations). METHODS: Two groups (planned with auto-planning VMAT, full and partial arcs) of eight patients each were analyzed: Group I (small planning target volume PTV, with average volume 48.9 ±44.4 cm3), Group II (large PTV, with average volume 532.4 ±368.8 cm3). Both beam modalities 6MV and 6MVFFF were compared in terms of Dmax, D95%, D1cc, D2cc, homogeneity index (HI), number of monitor units (MU), treatment delivery time. RESULTS: Using the 6MVFFF, the treatment delivery time was significantly reduced (p<0.05). For larger PTVs, the number of MU increased by more than twice, and the p-value shown a significant difference (p= 0.008). The value of Dmax increased by 4%. On the contrary, for small volumes, the results were quite similar from 6MVFFF to 6MV except some differences in terms of MU. CONCLUSION: It is recommended to use 6MVFFF beam with small PTV volumes. Dose distributions are almost the same as with 6MV and there is a significant reduction of the treatment delivery time up to 57%. Due to the dose profile shape in FFF mode, the dose is lowered beyond the central axis for the FFF beams, and the additional MU allows the dose to be delivered away from the beam axis.