RESUMO
COVID-19 has overloaded health system worldwide; thus, it demanded a triage method for an efficient and early discrimination of patients with COVID-19. The objective of this research was to perform a model based on commonly requested hematological variables for an early featuring of patients with COVID-19 form other viral pneumonia. This investigation enrolled 951 patients (mean of age 68 and 56% of male) who underwent a PCR test for respiratory viruses between January 2019 and January 2020, and those who underwent a PCR test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 between February 2020 and October 2020. A comparative analysis of the population according to PCR tests and logistic regression model was performed. A total of 10 variables were found for the characterization of COVID-19: age, sex, anemia, immunosuppression, C-reactive protein, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiorespiratory disease, metastasis, leukocytes and monocytes. The ROC curve revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 75%. A deep analysis showed low levels of leukocytes in COVID-19-positive patients, which could be used as a primary outcome of COVID-19 detection. In conclusion, this investigation found that commonly requested laboratory variables are able to help physicians to distinguish COVID-19 and perform a quick stratification of patients into different prognostic categories.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) is considered the histologic hallmark of ARDS although DAD is absent in approximately half of patients with ARDS. The clinical implications of having the syndrome of ARDS with DAD vs other histologic patterns is unknown. To address this question, we conducted a meta-analysis of lung biopsy series for patients with ARDS. METHODS: Studies were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, LILACS, and citation review from January 1, 1967, to September 1, 2015. Studies were included if they included all of the following: open lung biopsies (OLB) performed after ARDS diagnosis; a clear definition of ARDS and DAD; histologic results of the OLB indicated the presence or absence of DAD; and mortality reported for the DAD and non-DAD groups. We excluded studies conducted solely on a specific histology subgroup (eg, DAD) and studies with fewer than 5 patients. Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion, and there were no language restrictions. RESULTS: Of 8 included studies, 4 were high-quality (n = 228) and 4 were middle-quality trials (n = 122). The meta proportion of DAD between all the groups was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.35-0.56; Q test, 21.1; I(2), 66.8%; P ≤ .01). The pooled OR for mortality in ARDS with DAD compared with ARDS without DAD was 1.81 (95% CI, 1.14-2.80; Q test, 8.8; I(2), 20.2%; P = .269). Age, sex, and days elapsed between ARDS diagnosis and OLB as well as sequential organ failure assessment score and Pao2/Fio2 ratio on the day of OLB did not differ between DAD and non-DAD groups. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis demonstrated that ARDS with DAD is associated with higher mortality than ARDS without DAD.
