Quality of life in geriatric depression: a comparison of remitters, partial responders, and nonresponders.

The authors examined patterns of improvement in quality of life (QOL) in elderly patients with recurrent major depression (MDD) after acute treatment. One hundred elderly (age 60-88 years) patients with recurrent MDD were randomized to receive either bupropion sustained-release (100 mg-300 mg/day) or paroxetine (10 mg-40 mg/day) for 6 weeks. Treatment with both paroxetine and bupropion was associated with improvements in QOL. Lower perceived Physical- and Social-Functioning QOL ratings at baseline were associated with lower treatment response. Improvement in depression symptom ratings correlated significantly with improvement in QOL on many domains, but accounted for less than one-quarter of the total variance. Remitters showed significantly (P<0.001) greater improvement than both Partial Responders and Nonresponders on various measures. Findings support the importance of treating elderly depressed patients to full remission to maximize impact on both emotional and physical QOL domains.

Response in relation to baseline anxiety levels in major depressive disorder treated with bupropion sustained release or sertraline.

Our objective was to determine if pretreatment anxiety levels were associated with preferential response to bupropion sustained release (n = 122) or sertraline (n = 126) during a 16-week randomized acute phase treatment study. Both agents had comparable antidepressant activity, and comparable anxiolytic effects using the intent-to-treat sample. Baseline anxiety levels were not related to antidepressant efficacy, and they did not differentiate responders to each agent. Time to clinically significant anxiolysis did not differentiate between treatment groups or between responders to each agent. These results contradict the commonly held, but unsubstantiated, belief that in clinically depressed anxious patients, serotonergic antidepressants are especially anxiolytic and that such patients preferentially benefit from the antidepressant or anxiolytic effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Thus, the clinical decision to select between these two agents when treating depressed outpatients cannot rest on either levels of pretreatment anxiety or on anticipation of more rapid or more complete anxiolysis.

Does pretreatment anxiety predict response to either bupropion SR or sertraline?

BACKGROUND: A common clinical belief is that more sedating and/or serotonin-selective antidepressants are preferred for depressed patients with symptoms of anxiety compared with more activating and/or catecholamine-selective antidepressants. The purpose of this study was to determine whether higher baseline anxiety is associated with different antidepressant responses to bupropion sustained release (SR) or sertraline. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis was conducted using pooled data from two identical 8-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter studies of bupropion SR (n=234), sertraline (n=225), and placebo (n=233) in adult outpatients with recurrent, major depressive disorder. Anxiety symptoms were measured using the 14-item Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale scores. RESULTS: Baseline anxiety levels were not related to antidepressant response to treatment with either bupropion SR or sertraline, nor did they differentiate between responders to bupropion SR and responders to sertraline. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline anxiety levels do not appear to be a basis for selecting between bupropion SR and sertraline in the treatment of outpatients with major depressive disorder.

Distribution and partial characterization of CREB-like immunoreactivity in the medicinal leech Hirudo.

The presence and distribution of immunoreactivity to the cyclic AMP response element binding protein (CREB) were determined in the central nervous system (CNS) and in peripheral tissues of the medicinal leech Hirudo. Western blots revealed several CREB-immunoreactive (CREB-IR) bands including one whose molecular weight (43-44 kDa) was similar to mammalian CREB. The 43-44 kDa CREB-like protein was detected in nuclear extracts of the ventral nerve cord and was not observed following preincubation of the primary antiserum with the epitope sequence. CREB-like immunoreactivity was detected in extracts from each of six regions of the leech CNS, and in extracts from leech body wall musculature, crop, intestine, jaw musculature, pharynx, and salivary tissues. Whole mounts of leech ganglia revealed specific CREB-IR in a restricted population of neurons distributed throughout the leech CNS. Apparent homologues to a pair of CREB-IR dorsolateral neurons were observed in most ganglia along the ventral nerve cord. Several CREB-IR neurons exhibited segmental specificity. A number of neurons stained with an antiserum to the cyclic AMP response element modulator (CREM). These neurons showed no overlap in location with CREB-IR neurons, and this staining was not eliminated with a preabsorption control. Possible roles for a CREB-like protein in the leech are discussed.

Do bupropion SR and sertraline differ in their effects on anxiety in depressed patients?

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of bupropion sustained release (SR) and sertraline on anxiety in outpatients with recurrent DSM-IV-defined major depressive disorder. METHOD: This retrospective analysis was conducted using pooled data from 2 identical, 8-week, acute-phase, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies of bupropion SR (N = 234), sertraline (N = 225), and placebo (N = 233). Symptoms of anxiety and depression were measured using the 14-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) and the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-21), respectively. Percentage reduction in baseline HAM-A total score for each treatment week was calculated to determine whether the time to onset of anxiolytic activity differed among antidepressant responders to each agent. Central nervous system (CNS) adverse events were tabulated. RESULTS: Bupropion SR and sertraline were comparably effective, both were superior to placebo in reducing depressive symptoms. and they did not differ in their effect on anxiety symptoms. Antidepressant responders (> 50% reduction in baseline HAM-D-21 score) in both groups showed marked and comparable reductions in HAM-A scores (baseline to exit). There were no differences between bupropion SR and sertraline in the median time (4 weeks) to reach a clinically significant anxiolytic effect (> or = 50% reduction in baseline HAM-A score). CNS adverse events were comparable for bupropion SR and sertraline, except for somnolence, which was more common in sertraline-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Bupropion SR and sertraline had comparable antidepressant and anxiolytic effects and an equally rapid onset of clinically significant anxiolytic activity. There was no difference in the activating effects between the 2 antidepressants. Selection between these 2 agents cannot be based on either anticipation of differential anxiolytic activity or differential CNS side effect profiles.

Bupropion sustained release versus paroxetine for the treatment of depression in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: Depression is a serious and widespread emotional disorder among the elderly. This study compared the efficacy and safety of bupropion sustained release (SR) with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine in the treatment of major depression in elderly outpatients. METHOD: Elderly (> or = 60 years) outpatients with major depressive disorder (DSM-IV criteria) were evaluated in this 6-week multicenter, randomized, double-blind study comparing bupropion SR, 100-300 mg/day, and paroxetine, 10-40 mg/day. Efficacy was assessed by changes in scores on the Hamilton Rating Scales for Depression (HAM-D) and Anxiety (HAM-A) and the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness and -Improvement scales. Safety was assessed by monitoring adverse events, vital signs, and body weight. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients ranging in age from 60 to 88 years were randomly assigned to treatment with bupropion SR (N = 48) or paroxetine (N = 52). Measurements of efficacy were similar between the 2 treatment groups, with both groups showing improved scores on all depression rating scales. Headache, insomnia, dry mouth, agitation, dizziness, and nausea occurred in > 10% of patients in both groups; somnolence, diarrhea, constipation, and anorexia occurred in > 10% of patients in the paroxetine group. No statistically significant differences between groups in vital signs or weight were found. CONCLUSION: Both bupropion SR and paroxetine were safe and effective for the treatment of depression in the elderly. Because of its favorable side effect profile, bupropion SR may provide a safe and effective nonserotonergic treatment alternative that is well suited as an antidepressant for the elderly.

A comparison of time-and-motion and self-reporting methods of work measurement.

OBJECTIVE: To compare results obtained from a time-and-motion study with those obtained using self-reporting. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Nurse executives are often required to provide additional patient care services with limited personnel resources. As a result, nurse executives must evaluate the appropriate allocation of nursing personnel resources. Work measurement may be used to evaluate personnel allocation. Multiple measurement approaches are available, but few studies have compared these methods. METHODS AND SUBJECTS: Eight nurses were observed by a single observer during five shifts (or approximately 40 hours per nurse). After completion of the time-and-motion study, participants were to self-report their work activities during their ensuing five shifts. Mixed-effects analysis of variance was used to determine the significance of the work measurement method on percentage of total time, number of activities, and mean time per activity by activity category. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety hours of time-and-motion study observations and 338 hours of self-report data were available for analysis. Comparable amounts of total time were reported within the various activity categories using time-and-motion and self-reporting methods. In terms of number of activities reported, a significantly higher number of activities were reported using time-and-motion. As a result, mean activity times were significantly longer using the self-reporting method compared with time-and-motion. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse executives should consider continuous self-reporting as a low-cost means of quantifying allocation of time among nursing personnel. Self-reporting, however, is not recommended for estimating the total number of activities or the mean time per activity because of perceptual differences between participants of what constitutes an activity.

Sexual dysfunction associated with the treatment of depression: a placebo-controlled comparison of bupropion sustained release and sertraline treatment.

This study compared the sexual functioning effects as well as the safety and efficacy of bupropion sustained release (bupropion SR) and sertraline. Three hundred sixty-four patients with normal sexual functioning and recurrent major depression were treated with bupropion SR (150-400 mg/day), sertraline (50-200 mg/day), or placebo for 8 weeks in this randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. Patients' depression, sexual functioning, and overall safety were assessed at regular clinic visits. Significantly (P < 0.05) more patients treated with sertraline experienced orgasm dysfunction compared with patients treated with bupropion SR or placebo. Bupropion SR, but not sertraline, was statistically significantly superior to placebo in improving scores on all depression scales by the end of the study. Headache occurred with similar frequency in all groups. Gastrointestinal disturbances occurred more frequently with sertraline; insomnia and agitation occurred more frequently with bupropion SR. Small decreases in mean weight were seen with both active treatments; the placebo group experienced a minor increase in mean weight. Both bupropion SR and sertraline were generally well tolerated, although sertraline was more often associated with sexual dysfunction. Bupropion SR, but not sertraline, was statistically superior to placebo in relieving depression by the end of the study. Bupropion SR may offer advantages over sertraline in treating depressed patients concerned with sexual functioning.

A placebo-controlled comparison of the antidepressant efficacy and effects on sexual functioning of sustained-release bupropion and sertraline.

Sexual dysfunction, a frequently reported side effect of many antidepressants, may result in patient dissatisfaction and noncompliance with treatment regimens. This paper describes the results of the first placebo-controlled comparison of the efficacy, safety, and effects on sexual functioning of sustained-release bupropion (bupropion SR) and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline. This randomized, double-masked, double-dummy, parallel-group, multicenter trial enrolled 360 patients with moderate-to-severe recurrent major depression. Patients were treated with bupropion SR 150 to 400 mg/d, sertraline 50 to 200 mg/d, or placebo for up to 8 weeks. Patients' depression and sexual functioning were assessed at weekly or biweekly clinic visits; safety was assessed by regular monitoring of adverse events, vital signs, and body weight. Treatment groups were similar at baseline in terms of age, sex, and race, and most patients had a diagnosis of moderate uncomplicated depression. Patients treated with bupropion SR or sertraline showed similar improvements on all efficacy measures; both active treatments were superior to placebo in improving scores on all rating scales for depression at various time points. Significantly more patients treated with sertraline experienced orgasmic dysfunction throughout the study than did patients treated with bupropion SR or placebo (P < 0.001). Headache was the most frequently reported adverse event in all 3 treatment groups and occurred with similar frequency in each group (30% to 40%). Nausea (31%), diarrhea (26%), insomnia (18%), and somnolence (17%) occurred in significantly more patients in the sertraline group than in the bupropion SR group (18%, 7%, 13%, and 3%, respectively) and the placebo group (10%, 11%, 4%, and 6%, respectively). Dry mouth occurred more frequently with bupropion SR (19%) than with sertraline (14%) or placebo (12%), although the differences were not significant. Changes in vital signs were similar in all groups. Similar (small, but not statistically significant) decreases in mean body weight were seen in both the bupropion SR (-1.06 kg) and sertraline (-0.79 kg) groups, whereas the placebo group experienced a minor increase (0.21 kg). Although bupropion SR and sertraline were similarly well tolerated and effective in the treatment of depression, sertraline treatment was more often associated with sexual dysfunction and certain other adverse events compared with bupropion SR and placebo. Therefore, bupropion SR may be an appropriate choice as an antidepressant for the treatment of sexually active patients.

Costs of epilepsy in an intermediate care facility for persons with mental retardation.

Epilepsy is a significant comorbid condition in institutionalized persons with developmental disabilities and may contribute significant additional costs. This study was conducted to provide an estimate of the costs of epilepsy from the institutional perspective. Costs were measured retrospectively for 50 persons with epilepsy and 50 persons without epilepsy matched by severity of developmental disability. A time and motion study was employed to assign opportunity costs to documented nursing and physician activities. Two separate methods of attribution were used and incremental costs attributable to epilepsy were found to be approximately $825 and $918 per person over a 6-month period. The following categories accounted for costs: personnel (47.0%), drug (39.6%), hospitalization (9.4%), and laboratories/procedures (4.0%). Results are useful for describing the economic burden of epilepsy.

A summary statistic for measuring change from baseline.

A statistic, W, for measuring change from baseline is developed. Its distribution is found. Simulations using W and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) are run and the results are compared. W is found to be less powerful than ANCOVA, yet is not seen to suffer some of the ill effects to which ANCOVA can fall prey, namely bias introduced by chance covariate imbalance.