Ruminal escape protein supplementation and zeranol implantation effects on performance of steers grazing winter annuals.

Fifty-four crossbred steers (275 kg) were assigned randomly to one of three isoenergetic but not isonitrogenous ruminal escape protein (EP) supplements: high ruminal escape protein (HEP), low ruminal escape protein (LEP), or corn. The supplements contained corn, distillers' dried grains with solubles (DDGS), and fish meal. Supplements were fed at approximately 1.5 kg/d; the HEP and LEP supplements provided .25 and .12 kg more EP per day than corn, respectively. These supplements also supplied .20 and .10 kg more CP per day than corn. Fish meal and DDGS provided 66.7 and 33.3% of the supplemental EP, respectively. One-half of the steers in each supplement treatment were implanted once with 36 mg of zeranol. Steers grazed wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) pastures for 73 d (March 1 to May 12). Daily gains (kg/d) increased linearly (P less than .07) as EP increased (HEP, 1.61; LEP, 1.54; corn, 1.47); responses were apparent only during the later periods as forage quality declined. Zeranol implants increased (P less than .02) ADG (kg/d) by 9.7% (1.58 vs 1.44). After grazing, all cattle were fed a finishing ration for 76 d. Pre-feedlot EP level produced a negative linear (P less than .04) response on feedlot ADG (kg/d) (HEP, 1.44; LEP, 1.50; corn, 1.59). Zeranol implantation during the grazing phase did not affect (P greater than .2) performance during the feedlot phase or carcass characteristics other than increased ribeye area (P less than .08). Compensatory feedlot performance negated all weight gain advantages elicited by EP supplementation during the grazing period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Protein and fiber digestion by steers grazing winter annuals and supplemented with ruminal escape protein.

Six abomasally cannulated Hereford steers (12 mo of age, 300 +/- 10 kg) grazing annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam.) paddocks were used in a replicated 3 x 3 Latin square design to determine effects of ruminal escape protein (EP) supplementation on forage intake, fiber digestion, and protein flow to the intestine. Steers were fed one of three isoenergetic supplements: high ruminal escape protein (HEP), low ruminal escape protein (LEP), or corn, which supplied an estimated .25, .125, or 0 kg of EP/d in addition to EP supplied by corn. Fish meal (FM) and distiller's dried grains with solubles (DDGS) were sources of EP; FM provided 66.7% and DDGS provided 33.3% of estimated EP. Steers were adjusted to each supplement for 7 d before a 4-d collection period. Both total and forage DMI responded quadratically (P less than .03 and P less than .07, respectively) to EP supplementation. Total tract DM digestion tended (P less than .13) to increase linearly with EP supplementation. Abomasal total CP flow increased linearly (P less than .10) as supplemental EP increased. Crude protein flow in steers receiving HEP, LEP, and corn was 1,137, 1,027, and 844 g/d, respectively. Likewise, abomasal nonammonia N (NAN) tended to be greater (P less than .15, linear) for steers receiving HEP. Nonammonia N flows were 1,044, 955, and 771 g/d for steers receiving HEP, LEP, and corn, respectively. Abomasal ammonia flow did not differ (P less than .20) among treatments, nor did reticuloruminal fiber digestion (P less than .20). These data indicate that EP can increase postruminal protein flow and will not negatively affect fiber digestion in steers grazing annual ryegrass pastures.