Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Urol ; 74(4): 465-471, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29784190

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Open radical cystectomy (ORC) has proven to be an important component in the treatment of high-risk bladder cancer (BCa). ORC surgical morbidity remains high; therefore, minimally invasive surgical techniques have been introduced in an attempt to improve patient outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare cancer outcomes in BCa patients managed with ORC or robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective, randomized trial was completed between 2010 and 2013. Patients were randomized to ORC/pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) or RARC/PLND, with all undergoing open/extracorporeal urinary diversion. Median follow-up was 4.9 (IQR: 3.9-5.9) yr after surgery among surviving patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Secondary outcomes to the trial included recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The trial randomized 118 patients who underwent RC/PLND and urinary diversion. Sixty were randomized to RARC and 58 to ORC. Four RARC-assigned patients refused randomization and received ORC; however, an intention to treat analysis was performed. No differences were observed in recurrence (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69-2.36; p=0.4) or cancer-specific survival (p=0.4). No difference in overall survival was observed (p=0.8). However, the pattern of first recurrence demonstrated a nonstatistically significant increase in metastatic sites for those undergoing ORC (sub-HR [sHR]: 2.21; 95% CI: 0.96-5.12; p=0.064) and a greater number of local/abdominal sites in the RARC-treated patients (sHR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.12-0.93; p=0.035). The major limitation to this study is that the trial was not powered to determine differences in cancer recurrences, survival outcomes, or patterns of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The secondary outcomes from our randomized trial did not definitively demonstrate differences in cancer outcomes in patients treated with ORC or RARC. However, differences in observed patterns of first recurrence highlight the need for future studies. PATIENT SUMMARY: Of 118 patients randomly assigned to undergo radical cystectomy/pelvic lymphadenectomy and urinary diversion, half were assigned to open surgery and half to robot-assisted techniques. We found no difference in risk of recurring or dying of bladder cancer between the two groups.


Assuntos
Cistectomia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Bexiga Urinária , Idoso , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Cistectomia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Excisão de Linfonodo/efeitos adversos , Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Duração da Cirurgia , Pelve , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Fatores de Risco , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Derivação Urinária/métodos
2.
Clin Cancer Res ; 10(9): 2918-21, 2004 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15131025

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium and other family-based ascertainments have suggested that male carriers of BRCA mutations are at increased risk of prostate cancer. Several series looking at the frequency of BRCA mutations in unselected patients with prostate cancer have not confirmed this finding. To clarify this issue, we conducted a large case-control study. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Blood specimens from 251 unselected Ashkenazi men with prostate cancer were screened for the presence of one of the three common Ashkenazi founder mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. The incidence of founder mutations was compared with the incidence of founder mutations in 1472 male Ashkenazi volunteers without prostate cancer using logistic regression analysis after adjusting for age. RESULTS: Thirteen (5.2%) cases had a deleterious mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 compared with 28 (1.9%) controls. After adjusting for age, the presence of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation was associated with the development of prostate cancer (odds ratio, 3.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.64-7.06; P = 0.001). When results were stratified by gene, BRCA2 mutation carriers demonstrated an increased risk of prostate cancer (odds ratio, 4.78; 95% confidence interval, 1.87-12.25; P = 0.001), whereas the risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers was not significantly increased. CONCLUSIONS: BRCA2 mutations are more likely to be found in unselected individuals with prostate cancer than age-matched controls. These results support the hypothesis that deleterious mutations in BRCA2 are associated with an increased risk of prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Proteína BRCA1/genética , Proteína BRCA2/genética , Judeus/genética , Mutação , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Mutacional de DNA , Genótipo , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...