RESUMO
Recent advancements in applications of deep neural network for bearing fault diagnosis under variable operating conditions have shown promising outcomes. However, these approaches are limited in practical applications due to the complexity of neural networks, which require substantial computational resources, thereby hindering the advancement of automated diagnostic tools. To overcome these limitations, this study introduces a new fault diagnosis framework that incorporates a tri-channel preprocessing module for multidimensional feature extraction, coupled with an innovative diagnostic architecture known as the Lightweight Ghost Enhanced Feature Attention Network (GEFA-Net). This system is adept at identifying rolling bearing faults across diverse operational conditions. The FFE module utilizes advanced techniques such as Fast Fourier Transform (FFT), Frequency Weighted Energy Operator (FWEO), and Signal Envelope Analysis to refine signal processing in complex environments. Concurrently, GEFA-Net employs the Ghost Module and the Efficient Pyramid Squared Attention (EPSA) mechanism, which enhances feature representation and generates additional feature maps through linear operations, thereby reducing computational demands. This methodology not only significantly lowers the parameter count of the model, promoting a more streamlined architectural framework, but also improves diagnostic speed. Additionally, the model exhibits enhanced diagnostic accuracy in challenging conditions through the effective synthesis of local and global data contexts. Experimental validation using datasets from the University of Ottawa and our dataset confirms that the framework not only achieves superior diagnostic accuracy but also reduces computational complexity and accelerates detection processes. These findings highlight the robustness of the framework for bearing fault diagnosis under varying operational conditions, showcasing its broad applicational potential in industrial settings. The parameter count was decreased by 63.74% compared to MobileVit, and the recorded diagnostic accuracies were 98.53% and 99.98% for the respective datasets.
