Prevalence and prognosis of increased pancreatic enzymes in patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of increased pancreatic enzymes (elevated serum amylase and/or lipase) and its relationship to clinical outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is not known. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies reporting prevalence and impact of increased pancreatic enzymes (defined as an elevation in amylase and/or lipase levels above the upper limit of normal [ULN] value) in COVID-19 was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 36,496 patients from 21 studies were included for this meta-analysis. The overall prevalence and mortality for increased pancreatic enzymes (>ULN) in COVID-19 were 25.4% (95% CI, 15.8%-36.2%) and 34.6% (95% CI, 25.5%-44.4%), respectively. The overall prevalence and mortality for increased pancreatic enzymes (>3 × ULN) were 6.1% (95% CI, 3.6%-9.2%) and 39.2% (95% CI, 18.7%-61.6%), respectively. Patients with increased pancreatic enzymes, including elevated serum lipase or amylase of either type, had worse clinical outcomes, including need for ICU admission, mechanical ventilation and mortality. DISCUSSION: Increased pancreatic enzymes is frequent and may exacerbate the consequences of COVID-19 infection.

CT/MRI LI-RADS version 2018 versus CEUS LI-RADS version 2017 in the diagnosis of primary hepatic nodules in patients with high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to explore the application value of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) version 2018 and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) LI-RADS version 2017 in high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients and to conduct a comparative analysis. METHODS: This study enrolled 250 high-risk HCC patients with 259 primary hepatic nodules from June 2017 to June 2020. Two investigators used a single-blind method to classify all nodules. The u-test, t-test, and Kappa test were performed. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value and receiver operating characteristic curves of LR-5 and LR-M in the diagnosis of HCC and non-HCC malignancy were respectively calculated. RESULTS: CT/MRI LI-RADS v2018 and CEUS LI-RADS v2017 showed substantial agreement inter-observers, and there was a moderate agreement inter-modality. The specificity and PPV of HCC and non-HCC malignancies in CT/MRI LR-5/M were higher than CEUS. The areas under the curve (AUC) of CT/MRI LR-5 and LR-M were 0.794 and 0.777, and the AUC of CEUS LR-5 and LR-M were 0.720 and 0.718, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Two modalities have substantial agreement inter-observers and moderate agreement inter-modalities. The diagnostic accuracy of HCC of CT/MRI LR-5 and non-HCC malignancy of CT/MRI LR-M are higher than CEUS.

Liver-Metastasis-Related Genes are Potential Biomarkers for Predicting the Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

It is widely acknowledged that metastasis determines the prognosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD), and the liver is the most primary distant metastatic location of PAAD. It is worth exploring the value of liver-metastasis-related genetic prognostic signature (LM-PS) in predicting the clinical outcomes of PAAD patients post R0 resection. We collected 65 tumors and 165 normal pancreatic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Genotype-Tissue Expression project (GTEx), respectively. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between primary tumor and normal pancreatic samples were intersected with DEGs between primary tumor samples with liver metastasis and those without new tumor events. The intersected 45 genes were input into univariate Cox regression analysis to identify the prognostic genes. Thirty-three prognostic liver-metastasis-related genes were identified and included in least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) analysis to develop a seven-gene LM-PS, which included six risk genes (ANO1, FAM83A, GPR87, ITGB6, KLK10, and SERPINE1) and one protective gene (SMIM32). The PAAD patients were grouped into low- and high-risk groups based on the median value of risk scores. The LM-PS harbored an independent predictive ability to distinguish patients with a high-risk of death and liver metastasis after R0 resection. Moreover, a robust prognostic nomogram based on LM-PS, the number of positive lymph nodes, and histologic grade were established to predict the overall survival of PAAD patients. Besides, a transcription factor-microRNA coregulatory network was constructed for the seven LM-PS genes, and the immune infiltration and genomic alterations were systematically explored in the TGCA-PAAD cohort.

Influence of dialysis duration on outcomes of simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess how pre-transplant dialysis duration affects transplant outcomes after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). METHODS: Data of 6887 T1DM patients who underwent SPK transplantation between 2008 and 2018 were obtained from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. According to pre-transplant dialysis duration, the patients were divided into the preemptive SPK, 0-2 years, 2-5 years, and >5 years dialysis groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to compare patient and graft survival among the groups. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify predictors of transplant outcomes. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 56.7 ± 34.7 months. Compared with no dialysis or preemptive SPK, dialysis for 0-2 years was not significantly associated with patient or kidney graft survival, while long-term dialysis of 2-5 years and >5 years was significantly associated with increased risk of death and kidney graft failure. However, the duration of dialysis was not associated with pancreas graft survival. CONCLUSION: Long-term dialysis duration before SPK transplant is an independent predictor of patient death and kidney graft failure in T1DM patients.

Pancreas preservation time as a predictor of prolonged hospital stay after pancreas transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Length of hospital stay is a sensitive indicator of short-term prognosis. In this retrospective study, we investigated how pancreas preservation time affects length of hospital stay after pancreas transplantation. METHODS: Patients receiving pancreas transplantation (1998.7-2018.6) were identified from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database and grouped according to pancreas preservation time. We analyzed the relationship of pancreas preservation time with graft and patient survival and prolonged length of stay (PLOS; i.e., hospital stay ≥20 days). RESULTS: We included 18,099 pancreas transplants in the survival analysis. Pancreas preservation time >20 hours had a significantly higher risk of graft failure than 8 to 12 hours. Pancreas preservation time was not significantly associated with patient survival. We included 17,567 pancreas transplants in the analysis for PLOS. Compared with 8 to 12 hours, pancreas preservation time >12 hours had a significantly higher PLOS risk, which increased with increased pancreas preservation time. In simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, we also found that pancreas preservation time was positively associated with PLOS risk with pancreas preservation time >12 hours. CONCLUSION: Pancreas preservation time is a sensitive predictor of PLOS. Transplant centers should minimize pancreas preservation time to optimize patient outcomes.

Outcomes of liver-kidney transplantation in patients with primary hyperoxaluria: an analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database.

BACKGROUND: Primary hyperoxaluria (PH) is an inherited disease lacking of hepatic oxalic acid metabolic enzymes which could lead to irreverisible renal damage. Currently, liver-kidney transplantation is a curative but highly invasive therapy used to treat patients with PH. However, limited studies have focused on combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) and sequential liver and kidney transplantation (SLKT) in patients with PH. METHODS: The present study included 201 patients with PH who received both liver and kidney transplants and who were listed on the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from 1987 to 2018. According to the liver-kidney transplant procedure, patients were separated into a CLKT group and a SLKT group. Patient demographics and transplant outcomes were assessed in each group. RESULTS: Compared with the SLKT group, The CLKT group got a worse pretransplant dialysis condition in both the proportion of patients under pretransplant dialysis (p = 0.048) and the duration of the pretransplant dialysis (p < 0.001). The SLKT group got higher human leukocyte antigen mismatch score of kidney donor (p < 0.001) and liver donor (p = 0.003). The CLKT group utilized higher proportion (98.9%) of organs from a single deceased donor, while the SLKT group utilized 75.0% of organs from deceased liver donors and only 35.0% of organs from deceased kidney donors (p < 0.001). Kidney function measured by serum creatinine concentration before liver transplantation (LT) or CLKT was similar (p = 0.305) between groups. Patient survival was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.717) and liver (p = 0.685) and kidney (p = 0.464) graft outcomes were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: SLKT seems to be an alternative option with strict condition for CLKT, further exploration about the SLKT is still required.

Influence of duration of type 1 diabetes on long-term pancreatic transplant outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There are no multicenter studies on the influence of diabetes duration on pancreatic transplant outcomes. Our study aimed to determine how type 1 diabetes duration influenced survival of pancreatic grafts. METHODS: The data of 8,139 patients who received pancreas transplants during 2006-2015 were extracted from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. Patients were separated into two groups according to duration of diabetes: S group (diabetes ≤20 years) and L group (>20 years). RESULTS: Compared to S group, L group were older and prone to be male, to have higher body mass index, to receive pancreas after kidney transplantation (PAK), and to be White. Patient survival was not significantly different between the two groups, but pancreatic survival was better in the L group (hazard ratio 0.88; P = 0.012). Pancreatic survival of L group was better than S group in pancreas transplant alone and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK). Graft survival was not significant different between the two groups in PAK. Diabetes duration was an independent predictor of graft survival in SPK patients (hazard ratio 0.86; P = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes duration has no influence on patient survival. However, long duration of type 1 diabetes mellitus appears to be protective against pancreatic graft loss.