Sublethal concentrations of conventional nematicides alter the physiological activities of Meloidogyne incognita and suppress parasitism.

Reducing nematicide dose rates could be a useful strategy for mitigating their negative effects on health and the environment. In this study, enzymatic activities and the parasitic ability of Meloidogyne incognita after exposure to sub-lethal concentrations (0.25, 1, 2, and 5 ppm) of ethoprophos, fenamiphos, and oxamyl were investigated. Although the tested concentrations did not show nematicidal properties in vitro, they reduced root galls by at least 30% at 0.25 ppm and up to 67% at 5 ppm in pots, besides disrupting nematode fertility. For all three nematicides at 2 ppm, a chemotaxis assay showed that ≤ 11% of the nematode population was successfully oriented to the host roots, compared to 44% in the control. Ethoprophos and fenamiphos at 5 ppm showed poor inhibitory effects on acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity (5.6% and 12.5%, respectively). In contrast, the same nematicides were shown to be strong ATPase inhibitors, causing 82.4% and 82.8% inhibition, respectively. At the same concentration, oxamyl moderately inhibited AChE and ATPase-specific activities, the inhibition being 22.5% and 35.2%, respectively. This study suggests that the use of very low nematicide concentrations could be a promising strategy for nematode management. Furthermore, it has also highlighted the role of ATPases as a possible target site for suppressing nematode activity in the development of future nematicides.

It takes time after bilateral nephrectomy for better control of resistant hypertension in renal transplant patients.

UNLABELLED: Severe resistant hypertension in end-stage renal disease patients has traditionally been an indication for bilateral nephrectomy (BN) before kidney transplantation. Nevertheless the influence of BN on successful control of hypertension has not been well documented. We sought to clarify the effect of BN on blood pressure patterns and control in renal transplant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 28 patients who underwent BN between November 2003 and May 2009 before or after kidney transplantation. Nineteen of them were under treatment with 4 or 5 antihypertensives according to the international guide lines; they had BN for resistant hypertension. They were considered as group 1 (G1). Nine patients operated for indications other than resistant hypertension; they constitute group 2 (G2) and considered as a control group. All patients received triple immunosuppression according to our local protocol. BN was done either before, simultaneously or after transplantation. Antihypertensives were recorded before and after BN. We evaluated our patients at 3 months, 1 year, and 3 years. Acute rejection episodes and calcinurein nephrotoxicity were reported. RESULTS: In G1, the mean age was 30.2 years (range, 10-62). In G2, the mean age was 33.6 years (range, 11-61). Before BN, G1 patients used antihypertensive drugs (3.6 +/- 1.05 drugs per day; mean +/- SD), which was significantly higher than in G2 patients (2.0 +/- 1.65 drugs per day; P = .02). Three months after BN, G1 patients used 2.6 + 0.9 drugs per day, with gradual reduction in number of antihypertensives to 1.4 +/- 1.3 drugs per day at 3 years (P = .008). In G2, there was reduction in antihypertensive drug number per day, which was insignificant during the follow-up period. No difference was noted between G1 and G2 drug administered after BN. We conclude that BN is effective to help blood pressure control, in resistant hypertension in renal transplant patients, but it starts to show up 3 months after surgery, and continues to work for a year and more.

Outcome of renal allografts with multiple arteries.

BACKGROUND: Renal allograft transplantation with multiple arteries (MRA) was always avoided as much as possible as it is technically demanding and carries a higher MSK for complications. This was a single-center study to explore the graft outcomes of kidney transplantation with MRA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 35 patients who received kidney grafts with MRA for the surgical technique, surgical complications, graft function, and graft survival. The results were compared with those achieved in recipients of kidney grafts with a single renal artery (SRA). RESULTS: Of 35 grafts, there were 2 renal arteries in 30 grafts, and 3 renal arteries in 5 grafts. In the MRA group, there were 7 instances of surgical complications, the mean serum creatinine levels were 122, 139, and 156 micromol/L at 1 month, 1 year, and 5 years, respectively, and the actuarial graft survival rates were 94.3%, 88.6%, and 83% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. In the SRA group, there were 56 instances of surgical complications, the mean serum creatinine levels were 115, 121, and 141 micromol/L at 1 month, 1 year, and 5 years, respectively, and the actuarial graft survival rates were 93.7%, 88.1%, and 84.4% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although transplantation of MRA grafts might carry a relatively higher risk for complications, it is justified because it gives results comparable with those achieved in SRA.

Renal allograft venous thrombosis is salvageable.

BACKGROUND: Renal vein thrombosis (RVT) is an uncommon but serious complication. It usually occurs early after surgery. While compression of the renal vein is the most common cause, early rejection and hemostatic defects are other known causes. The symptoms are nonspecific and diagnosis is often delayed. Ultrasonography and renal isotope scan findings may resemble acute rejection or acute tubular necrosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 684 recipients who were transplated between November 1993 and May 2006. The diagnosis of RVT was suspected by an unexplained drop in urine output, rise in serum creatinine, or hematuria, and confirmed by Doppler ultrasound and isotope scanning. Urgent exploration was performed in all suspected cases. RESULTS: Seven incidences of biopsy-proven RVT were encountered, including 3 associated with hematoma and 1 with rejection. Four grafts were from cadaveric donors. Three grafts were salvaged. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of RVT in the present series was 1%. All cases developed in the first 2 weeks after transplantation. It was more common in adults, in female recipients, and in cadaveric grafts. Early diagnosis and intervention were the keys to salvage.

The area under the concentration-time curve versus trough and peak blood level monitoring in renal transplant recipients on cyclosporine.

OBJECTIVE: The area under the concentration-time curve of cyclosporine microemulsion is the best measure of the absorption and beneficial effects in renal transplant recipients. We sought to determine the best method of monitoring cyclosporine levels in these patients. METHODS: Prospective evaluation of peak cyclosporine blood levels and area under the curve monitoring were performed for 1 year in 65 renal transplant recipients (study group). Cyclosporine trough levels and peak cyclosporine blood levels were correlated with the calculated area under the curve. Cyclosporine trough levels were monitored in equal numbers of matched controls. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the incidence of acute rejection, cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, proteinuria, serum creatinine levels, or graft and patient outcomes between the groups (P = .1). Peak cyclosporine blood levels guided by calculating the area under the curve were found to be 27% to 32% lower than previously reported. The correlation coefficient was <70% for cyclosporine trough levels (P < .02) and >90% for peak cyclosporine blood levels (P < .001) when related to the calculated area under the curve. The calculated area under the curve was approximately 6000 ng/mL/h following transplantation, gradually decreasing to approximately 3000 ng/mL/h at 1 year. Both appeared to the acceptable therapeutic values. CONCLUSION: Calculating the area under the curve using trough and peak blood levels versus using isolated readings for either of these levels alone is the most effective method of monitoring cyclosporine in recipients undergoing renal transplant.

Malignancy in renal recipients.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressed organ transplant recipients are more susceptible to cancer than are persons in the general population. If malignancies of the skin are excluded for geographic variation, a cancer incidence of 4% to 7% in transplant recipients is usual. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to find the incidence, histopathological types, and outcome of malignancy in kidney transplant recipients in Kuwait. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1972 and October 2004, more than 1500 kidney recipients were followed. After excluding recipients who left the country soon after transplantation, we reviewed the medical records of the remaining 1171 kidney recipients (724 male and 447 female patients of ages 3 to 76 years) at the time of transplantation. Kidney grafts were obtained from 968 living and 203 deceased donors. Records were retrospectively reviewed for the incidence, clinical presentation, histopathological patterns, and outcome of cancer. RESULTS: Fifty-six malignant lesions (4.8%) were diagnosed in 51 recipients (28 men and 23 women, aged 15 to 66 years), who had received grafts from 44 living and seven cadaveric donors. Malignancy was diagnosed 4 to 288 months after transplantation. The most commonest types were posttransplantation lymphoma and Kaposi's sarcoma. Posttransplantation cancer presented earlier in female and in adult recipients and following decreased donor transplantation. Kaposi's sarcoma appeared earlier than posttransplantation lymphoma or squamous cell carcinoma. Less than 40% of recipients with malignancy are alive.