Hearing outcomes of cochlear implant recipients with pre-operatively identified cochlear dead regions.

Objectives: To determine how patients who did not meet UK TA166 NICE criteria for cochlear implantation (CI) but were subsequently found to have cochlear dead regions (DRs) performed with CI.Methods: A retrospective review of medical records was performed on CI recipients: 152 controls and 40 in the DR group. Of these, 34 pairs were matched by pre-operative Bamford-Kowal-Bench (BKB) scores and compared.Results: The forty DR patients had a median age at implantation of 56 years. Their mean pre-operative BKB score of 23% increased to 78% after CI. Thirty-seven experienced improvements in BKB scores. In matched case-control analysis, the improvement in mean BKB score with CI was no different (p = 0.19) between the DR group and control group; a similar proportion of patients benefitted in each group.Discussion: This study is the largestreport to date of performance of patients with DRs, before and after CI. The DR group gain similar benefit as the controls.Conclusion: Patients with DRs, who did not meet TA166 NICE criteria, received the same benefit as those who did. TEN testing to detect DRs should be included in routine CI work-up where standard criteria are not met.

The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire: an otology-specific patient-recorded outcome measure. A paper describing the instrument design and a report of preliminary reliability and validity.

OBJECTIVE: The Cambridge Otology Quality of Life Questionnaire (COQOL) is a patient-recorded outcome measurement (PROM) designed to quantify the quality of life of patients attending otology clinics. DESIGN: Item-reduction model. A systematically designed long-form version (74 items) was tested with patient focus groups before being presented to adult otology patients (n. 137). Preliminary item analysis tested reliability, reducing the COQOL to 24 questions. This was then presented in conjunction with the SF-36 (V1) questionnaire to a total of 203 patients. Subsequently, these were re-presented at T + 3 months, and patients recorded whether they felt their condition had improved, deteriorated or remained the same. Non-responders were contacted by post. A correlation between COQOL scores and patient perception of change was examined to analyse content validity. SETTING: Teaching hospital and university psychology department. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients attending otology clinics with a wide range of otological conditions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Item reliability measured by item­total correlation, internal consistency and test­ retest reliability. Validity measured by correlation between COQOL scores and patient-reported symptom change. RESULTS: Reliability: the COQOL showed excellent internal consistency at both initial presentation (a = 0.90) and 3 months later (a = 0.93). Validity: One-way analysis of variance showed a significant difference between groups reporting change and those reporting no change in quality of life (F(2, 80) = 5.866, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The COQOL is the first otology-specific PROM. Initial studies demonstrate excellent reliability and encouraging preliminary criterion validity: further studies will allow a deeper validation of the instrument.