The Impact of a Breast Cancer Risk Assessment on the Decision for Gender-Affirming Chest Masculinization Surgery in Transgender and Gender-Diverse Individuals: A Pilot Single-Arm Educational Intervention Trial.

BACKGROUND: Persons assigned female or intersex at birth and identify as transgender and/or gender-diverse (TGD) may undergo gender-affirming chest masculinization surgery (GACMS); however, GACMS is not considered equivalent to risk-reducing mastectomies (RRM). This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of elevated breast cancer (BC) risk in TGD persons, compare self-perceived versus calculated risk, and determine how risk impacts the decision for GACMS versus RRM. METHODS: A prospective single-arm pilot educational intervention trial was conducted in individuals assigned female or intersex at birth, age ≥ 18 years, considering GACMS, without a BC history or a known pathogenic variant. BC risk was calculated using the Tyrer-Cuzik (all) and Gail models (age ≥ 35 years). Elevated risk was defined as ≥ 17%. RESULTS: Twenty-five (N = 25) participants were enrolled with a median age of 24.0 years (interquartile range, IQR 20.0-30.0 years). All were assigned female sex at birth, most (84%) were Non-Hispanic (NH)-White, 48% identified as transgender and 40% as nonbinary, and 52% had a first- and/or second-degree family member with BC. Thirteen (52%) had elevated risk (prevalence 95% confidence interval (CI) 31.3-72.2%). Median self-perceived risk was 12% versus 17.5% calculated risk (p = 0.60). Of the 13 with elevated risk, 5 (38.5%) underwent/are scheduled to undergo GACMS, 3 (23%) of whom underwent/are undergoing RRM. CONCLUSIONS: Over half of the cohort had elevated risk, and most of those who moved forward with surgery chose to undergo RRM. A BC risk assessment should be performed for TGD persons considering GACMS. Future work is needed to examine BC incidence and collect patient-reported outcomes. Trial Registration Number ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT06239766).

Risk Factors for Skin Flap and Nipple-Areolar Necrosis in Patients Undergoing Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy With Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap Reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction is a surgical option for select patients with or at risk of breast cancer. However, post-operative skin flap and nipple-areolar complex (NAC) necrosis remain common complications. This study aimed to identify factors associated with necrosis in patients undergoing NSM with DIEP reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed from 2015 to 2023. 74 variables were analyzed in patients undergoing NSM with DIEP. Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on post-operative skin/NAC necrosis: none, partial thickness, and full thickness. Comparative and descriptive statistics were performed via t-tests, ANOVA, and chi-squared tests. RESULTS: 34 women with 31 breast cancers met inclusion. 44% experienced necrosis: 15% partial thickness and 29% full thickness. The majority were white (85.3%) with mean age of 50 years (SD = 9.11). In patients with immediate DIEP reconstruction, hypoperfused areas identified by SPY angiography increased risk of necrosis (P = .012). Approximately 50% of both partial thickness and full thickness necrosis patients had concerns on SPY angiography. Former smokers in the full thickness necrosis group had more pack years than those without necrosis (9 vs .65 pack years, P = .035). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving NSM with DIEP flap reconstruction, those with hypoperfusion on SPY angiography and longer smoking history had higher necrosis rates. This supports the continued used of SPY angiography and the role of pre-operative counseling in former smokers with increased pack years on their risk of necrosis and the role of preventative measures in the perioperative setting.

Robotic Repair: An Alternative Technique for Rectus Diastasis and Abdominal Bulge Following DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The Deep Inferior Epigastric Artery Perforator (DIEP) flap is the gold standard in autologous breast reconstruction. Despite advances in perforator dissection, abdominal morbidity still occurs. Traditional rectus diastasis (RD), abdominal bulge, and hernia repair with open techniques are associated with higher complication rates and recurrence. OBJECTIVES: We present a novel case series of robotic repair of symptomatic RD and/or abdominal bulge with concurrent hernia following DIEP flap surgery. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective review was conducted on 10 patients who underwent bilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction and subsequent robotic repair of RD and/or abdominal bulge and hernia. Pre-operative demographics and post-operative clinical outcomes were reviewed. RD up to 5 cm, abdominal bulge, and any concurrent ventral/umbilical hernias were repaired robotically via retrorectus plication and macroporus mesh reinforcement. RESULTS: The average age and BMI were 49 years (range 41-63) and 31 kg/m2 (range 26-44), respectively. The average number of perforators harvested per flap was 2.5 (range 1-4). Average RD and hernia size were 3.95 cm (range 2-5) and 5.8 cm2 (1-15), respectively. Eight patients stayed one night in the hospital, two went home the same day as the robotic repair. No patients converted to open technique and none experienced complications within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: For the patients who experience donor site morbidity following DIEP flap breast reconstruction, minimally invasive robotic repair of RD and/or abdominal bulge with hernia can be performed with mesh reinforcement. This technique is effective with low complication rates and should be considered over open repair.

Microsurgical breast reconstruction and primary hypercoagulable disorders.

BACKGROUND: Primary hypercoagulable disorders pose a significant challenge to microsurgeons and have traditionally been regarded as a relative contraindication to free tissue transfer. Since free flaps offer numerous advantages in breast reconstruction, there is an effort to expand the population to whom these operations can be safely offered. The purpose of this study is to describe our chemoprophylaxis regimen in cases of primary hypercoagulability, as well as to compare flap outcomes and complications between women with and without hypercoagulability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A single institution retrospective review identified 15 patients (25 flaps) with known primary hypercoagulability who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from 2010 through 2020. There were 785 patients (1268 flaps) without primary hypercoagulability who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction, including 40 patients (73 flaps) with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), evaluated for comparison. Patient characteristics, thromboprophylaxis regimen, and surgical outcomes were collected. In carrying out this cohort study, we have adhered to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with primary hypercoagulability were identified, including heterozygous factor V Leiden mutation (n = 12), protein S deficiency (n = 1), prothrombin mutation (n = 1), and primary antiphospholipid syndrome (n = 1). Thirteen of these (87%) were discharged with an extended LMWH course. There was no postoperative VTE or mortality in this cohort, and no significant difference in hematoma or transfusion compared with the control group (p = .31, p = .87, respectively). The flap loss rate was 4% in the hypercoagulable group compared with 0.92% in the control group (p = .15). The salvage for arterial or venous compromise in the hypercoagulable group was poor (0% vs. 52%, p = .3). CONCLUSION: Microsurgical breast reconstruction in women with primary hypercoagulability disorders is feasible with acceptable risk of flap loss but poor salvage potential. Postoperative thromboprophylaxis with extended prophylactic LMWH in this population appears to be a safe regimen.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in lower extremity free tissue transfers.

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) an immunologically mediated reaction to heparin products, can lead to severe thrombocytopenia and potentially life-threatening thrombotic events. In microsurgery, a missed or delayed diagnosis of HIT can cause complications requiring revision operations, flap loss, or limb loss. Surgeons must remain vigilant for this uncommon yet potentially devastating condition and keep abreast of management strategies. METHODS: CPT and ICD-10 codes in electronic medical records were used to collect demographic information, clinical courses, and outcomes for patients with a HIT diagnosis who underwent lower extremity free tissue transfer in one institution. RESULTS: The authors' institution performed 415 lower extremity free flaps in 411 patients during the 10-year study period. Flap salvage rate was 71% for compromised lower extremity flaps without HIT, and 25% in those with HIT. Four patients (four flaps) met study inclusion criteria during the study period. Three of the four flaps failed and were later debrided; one was rescued after a takeback for anastomosis revision. Two patients successfully underwent a delayed second free flap procedure after recovery, and one was salvaged with a pedicled muscle flap. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons should monitor for HIT by establishing coagulation panel and platelet count baselines and trending these values in the early post-operative period for patients treated with heparin products. The 4T score can be used to screen for HIT with high clinical suspicion. Arterial thrombosis or poor flap perfusion despite sound microvascular technique could suggest HIT. Surgical and medical management including strict heparin avoidance can prevent adverse events for these patients.

Evaluating Both Partner and Patient Satisfaction With Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Few studies have looked in-depth at the relationship between patient and partner satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction. The studies that do exist suggest that perceived partner satisfaction is an important predictor of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. METHODS: We created a novel survey designed to look at reconstruction outcomes from a partner's perspective. Patients with a history of mastectomy-alone or mastectomy with reconstruction at our institution from January 2011 through December 2020 were contacted electronically to complete a demographic form and the BREAST-Q, while partners completed our novel partner survey. Sixteen mastectomy-only and 76 mastectomy with reconstruction couples completed surveys. RESULTS: The mean Breast-Q and partner survey scores were 87 and 87 (maximum possible = 100), respectively, for mastectomy with reconstruction. There was a correlation of 0.57 between patient and partner overall satisfaction. There was no difference in overall satisfaction between patients who underwent reconstruction and those who did not (P = 0.19). There was a relationship between satisfaction with preoperative counseling and overall satisfaction in both patients and partners. The partner survey was found to have high internal consistency for measuring various areas of partner satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: There is a relationship between patient and partner satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Our data may support the positive impact of social support on recovery after breast cancer treatment, as satisfaction was high in both groups. We therefore encourage partners to attend and participate in preoperative consultations. Finally, our novel partner survey is a reliable tool to assess partner satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

Rates of major complications and flap loss for abdominally based breast reconstruction in obese patients are independent of WHO class of obesity.

INTRODUCTION: Obesity is a risk factor for complications following autologous breast reconstruction. Little is known regarding outcomes based on the degree of obesity. This study compares breast reconstruction outcomes and complication rates for the three classes defined by the body mass index (BMI)-based WHO classification. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective chart review identifying obese patients who underwent abdominally based breast reconstruction between January 2011 and January 2021. Patients were stratified by BMI class [class 1 (C1) = 30-34.99 kg/m2, class 2 (C2) = 35-39.99 kg/m2, and class 3 (C3) = 40 kg/m2 + ]. Outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients (395 flaps) were included with 138 patients were classified as C1, 68 patients as C2, and 26 patients as C3. Rates of any complication (80%) and at least one major complication (31%) did not vary significantly (P = 0.057, 0.185). Individual rates of 30-day readmission (18%) or reoperation (26%) did not vary significantly (P = 0.588 and 0.059). Rates of seroma (C1 = 15%, C2 = 16%, and C3 = 35%), hernia (C1 = 0%, C2 = 4%, and C3 = 8%), and incisional dehiscence (C1 = 30%, C2 = 44%, and C3 = 62%) were associated with significantly increased risk with higher classes of obesity (P < 0.05). The rate of flap failure did not vary significantly (P = 0.573). CONCLUSION: The risk of major complications and total flap loss associated with abdominally based breast reconstruction does not differ between the classes of obesity. Although complication rates are high overall in the obese population, detrimental complications do not vary between the classes. Patients should be counseled regarding their individual risk without the need for arbitrary BMI cutoffs.

Surgical Management of Breast Amyloidosis.

Amyloidosis is characterized by extracellular deposition of insoluble misfolded beta-pleated proteins. Amyloid disease involving the breast is rare and there is a paucity of literature guiding surgical management in caring for these patients. In this article we review medical and surgical management with an emphasis on post mastectomy breast reconstruction. We propose an algorithm for breast reconstructive options based on unique considerations in this patient population. An institutional database at the Medical College of Wisconsin was used to identify patients diagnosed with breast amyloidosis from 2011 to 2021. We utilized the electronic medical record to present patient demographics, diagnostic and treatment data regarding the medical and surgical management of these patients. Five women were identified with a median age of 70 years and a median follow up of 19 months (range, 9-80 months). All patients were diagnosed with light chain (AL) type of amyloidosis. Systemic amyloidosis was identified in 3 patients and localized disease was identified in 2 patients. Concurrent breast malignancy was identified in 2 patients who underwent skin-sparing mastectomies followed by breast reconstruction with both prosthetic and autologous techniques. Both prosthetic and autologous reconstructive techniques are safe in patients with amyloidosis, however careful consideration and preoperative work-up are warranted to avoid complications in this vulnerable population. Further studies are warranted to improve surgical outcomes in patients with amyloidosis involving the breast.

Abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction in the severely obese population: Is it safe?

INTRODUCTION: Class 3 (severe) obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m2 . Obesity is common and an independent risk factor for breast cancer. The plastic surgeon will be tasked with providing reconstruction for obese patients after mastectomy. This presents a surgical dilemma because patients with elevated BMI are known to have greater rates of morbidity when undergoing free flap reconstruction, however free flap reconstruction is associated with greater functional and aesthetic outcomes. This study quantifies complication rates in a cohort of patients with class 3 obesity that underwent abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction. This study may be able answer whether this surgery is feasible or safe. METHODS: Patients with a class 3 obesity who underwent abdominally-based free flap breast reconstruction between January 1, 2011 and February 28, 2020 at the authors' institution were identified. A retrospective chart review was performed to record patient demographics and peri-operative data. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Eighty percent of patients had at least one minor complication including infection (42%), fat necrosis (31%), seroma (15%), abdominal bulge (8%), and hernia (8%). Thirty-eight percent of patients had at least one major complication (requiring readmission (23%) and/or a return to the operating room (38%)). No flaps failed. CONCLUSION: Abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction in patients with class 3 obesity is associated with great morbidity, however, no patients experienced flap loss or failure which may imply that this population can safely undergo surgery so long as the surgeon is prepared for complications and takes steps to mitigate risk.

17ß-Estradiol promotes sex-specific dysfunction in isolated human arterioles.

Despite data showing that estrogen is vasculoprotective in large conduit arteries, hormone therapy (HT) during menopause has not proven to mitigate cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Estrogen exposure through prolonged oral contraceptive use and gender-affirming therapy can also increase cis- and trans-females' risk for future CVD, respectively. The microvasculature is a unique vascular bed that when dysfunctional can independently predict future adverse cardiac events; however, studies on the influence of estrogen on human microvessels are limited. Here, we show that isolated human arterioles from females across the life span maintain nitric oxide (NO)-mediated dilation to flow, whereas chronic (16-20 h) exposure to exogenous (100 nM) 17ß-estradiol promotes microvascular endothelial dysfunction in vessels from adult females of <40 and ≥40 yr of age. The damaging effect of estrogen was more dramatic in arterioles from biological males, as they exhibited both endothelial and smooth muscle dysfunction. Furthermore, females of <40 yr have greater endothelial expression of estrogen receptor-ß (ER-ß) and G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) compared with females of ≥40 yr and males. Estrogen receptor-α (ER-α), the prominent receptor associated with protective effects of estrogen, was identified within the adventitia as opposed to the endothelium across all groups. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the detrimental effects of estrogen on the human microvasculature and highlights differences in estrogen receptor expression.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Microvascular dysfunction is an independent predictor of adverse cardiac events; however, the effect of estrogen on the human microcirculation represents a critical knowledge gap. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report sex-specific detrimental effects of chronic estrogen on human microvascular reactivity. These findings may offer insight into the increased CVD risk associated with estrogen use in both cis- and trans-females.

Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction following implementation of the affordable care act: A systematic review using a minority health and disparities research framework.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review assesses racial disparities for African American (AA) women in breast reconstruction following the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. METHODS: Four databases (Ovid Medline, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) were searched for peer-reviewed articles published between January 2011 and September 2021. RESULTS: Out of 917 screened articles, 61 were included. The most common metrics were breast reconstruction rates (57.4%) and clinical outcomes (14.8%). Pooled reconstruction rates were 45.7% in white and 38.5% in AA women. 95.1% of studies found disparities in breast reconstruction rates. The greatest influencers on reconstruction rates were individual interactions in the healthcare system (54%), sociocultural environment (39%), behavioral factors (31%), and community interactions with the healthcare system (36%). CONCLUSION: Racial disparities in postmastectomy breast reconstruction persist. Focusing on implicit bias, communication barriers and infrastructure are the most promising strategies to create equitable access to breast reconstruction for AA women.

Outcome comparison between muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps after secondary orthopedic procedures.

Lower extremity wounds associated with fractures and bony defects often require secondary orthopedic procedures after flap coverage has been performed. In this study, we compare complications between muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps after secondary orthopedic procedures. A retrospective chart review study of all lower extremity soft tissue reconstructions by a single surgeon over seven years yielded a subgroup of patients who underwent secondary orthopedic procedures, including hardware removal, hardware revision, and bone grafting after flap reconstruction. Of 355 lower extremity, soft tissue reconstructions for orthopedic coverage performed in the time period studied, 102 patients underwent secondary orthopedic procedures after flap reconstruction. Of these, 54 received muscle flaps (52.94%), and 48 received fasciocutaneous flaps (47.06%). Using this subgroup of 102 patients, we compared muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps using three categories of wound complications following these secondary procedures: There were no superficial wounds requiring local wound care only in the muscle flap group (0%, n = 0) versus 4.17% (n = 2; p = 0.130) in the fasciocutaneous flap group. There were 2 lost flaps requiring surgical debridement and additional skin grafting in the muscle flaps group (3.70%) versus 2 (4.17%; p = 0.904) in the fasciocutaneous flap group. In the third category, flap loss requiring additional soft tissue reconstruction was 18.52% (n = 10) in the muscle group versus 2.08% (n = 1; p = 0.008) in the fasciocutaneous flap group. Our data support the existing literature indicating that fasciocutaneous flaps can tolerate secondary procedures better than muscle flaps and should initially be considered in patients with higher probability of needing additional orthopedic procedures after reconstruction.

Comparative Analysis of Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Implant-based Breast Reconstruction.

Recent advances in mastectomy and reconstruction have allowed for an evolution in implant-based breast reconstruction to a muscle-sparing, prepectoral approach. Advantages of this technique may include reductions in postoperative pain, shorter hospitalization, less narcotic usage, and improved aesthetic outcomes. Postoperative complication rates are described as comparable to subpectoral techniques; however, little comparative data exist to adequately assess prepectoral versus subpectoral implant placement. METHODS: To address this knowledge gap, we performed a single institution retrospective review of 186 (83 prepectoral, 103 subpectoral) consecutive immediate breast reconstructions. All cases were tracked for a minimum of 2 years between 2016 and 2021. RESULTS: Prepectoral patients demonstrated an overall higher seroma rate (P = 0.001), with all other postoperative complications being comparable. Prepectoral patients tolerated higher intraoperative tissue expander fill volumes (P < 0.001), shorter hospital stays (P = 0.007), fewer clinic visits for tissue expansion (P < 0.001), and experienced less animation deformity (P = 0.005). Both groups demonstrated similar pain scores (P = 0.65) and needs for narcotics (P = 0.8) as well as comparable scores of capsular contracture (P = 0.791). CONCLUSIONS: Our comparative analysis of consecutive immediate implant-based breast reconstructions finds prepectoral reconstruction to be safe and effective. Compared with subpectoral reconstruction, the prepectoral approach may offer quicker tissue expansion, less postoperative office visits, less need for muscle relaxants, and a shorter hospital stay with a comparable complication profile.

Clinical course of venous thromboembolism following abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction: A case series.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially devastating complication following abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction, with a reported incidence of 0.08-4%. The authors aim to describe disease presentation and clinical course following VTE diagnosis in patients within their practice. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified patients who underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction from January 2007 through December 2018. Patients with VTE diagnosed within 90 days of surgery were included. Demographics, co-morbidities, signs and symptoms, and characteristics of oncologic, surgical, and post-operative care were analyzed. RESULTS: Seven hundred one patients underwent microsurgical breast reconstruction. Eleven patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) and four with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were identified, resulting in VTE incidence of 2.1% (0.57% DVT, 1.6% PE). Patients were on average 51 years old and had an average body mass index (BMI) of 31.7 kg/m2. Two had a history of VTE, and none had a known hypercoagulable disorder. Using the 2005 Caprini model, all were high risk and seven were highest risk. Among those with PE, the most common symptom was shortness of breath, and the most common signs were desaturation or supplemental oxygen requirements. VTE was diagnosed on average 14.2 days post-operatively (range 2-52 days). CONCLUSION: VTE is an infrequent complication following abdominally based microsurgical breast reconstruction. We recommend a high index of suspicion in women reporting shortness of breath or having desaturation, especially in those with high BMI, high Caprini scores, post-operative complications, or early return to the operating room.

Complications of Cosmetic Surgery Tourism: Case Series and Cost Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Cosmetic surgery tourism is increasing exponentially. Patients seek cosmetic procedures within the United States and abroad, lured by lower cost procedures, shorter waiting lists, and affordable airfare and hotel accommodations. Unfortunately, operations are often performed by non-board-certified plastic surgeons, sometimes not even by plastic surgeons. Preoperative counseling, frequently limited to a video-chat with an office secretary, provides inadequate discussion regarding potential complications. Postoperative care is careless and rarely involves the operating surgeon. Complications are frequent, with management falling into the hands of plastic surgeons unfamiliar with the patient's care. Furthermore, the physician, rather than the patient or hospital, faces the largest cost burden. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to explore their institution's experience treating complications of cosmetic tourism and investigate associated costs. METHODS: The retrospective review of 16 patients treated for complications related to cosmetic surgery tourism plus cost analysis revealed a substantial discrepancy between money saved by undergoing surgery abroad and massive costs accrued to treat surgical complications. RESULTS: The most common complication was infection, often requiring surgery or IV antibiotics on discharge. Mean cost per patient was $26,657.19, ranging from $392 (single outpatient visit) to $154,700.79 (prolonged admission and surgery). Overall, the hospital retained 63% of billed charges, while physicians retained only 9%. The greatest amount paid by any single patient was $2635.00 by a patient with private insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Cosmetic tourism has severe medical repercussions for patients and complications that burden hospitals, physicians, and the US medical system. Physicians treating the complications suffer the greatest financial loss.

Exploring the Role of Partner Satisfaction in Predicting Patient Satisfaction Regarding Post-mastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Qualitative studies have suggested that perceived partner satisfaction is an important predictor of patient satisfaction in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. To better characterize these relationships, a couple-based study employing a quantitative analysis was conducted. METHODS: BREAST-Q and a novel partner survey were used to assess relationships among patient satisfaction, perceived partner satisfaction, and reported partner satisfaction in 11 couples. Breast reconstruction patients completed the postoperative BREAST-Q, and their partners completed a survey designed to assess satisfaction with their emotional relationship, partner's breasts, partner's medical care, and sexual relationship. RESULTS: The majority of patients were married. Seventy-three percent of women had an implant-based reconstruction, while 27% had an abdominal-based reconstruction. The majority (82%) of patients reported no complications with reconstructive procedures. The mean patient BREAST-Q score was 86 (range, 48-97), and the mean partner score was 87 (64-98). There was a correlation of 0.85 between reported partner satisfaction and patient satisfaction. Fifty-eight percent of partners reported being afraid to touch their partner's reconstructed breasts out of fear of causing pain; 7% of patients reported experiencing pain in the area of their reconstructed breasts. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that partner satisfaction with breast reconstruction correlates with patient satisfaction. With this knowledge, we will be able to formulate suggestions on how preoperative consultations could be conducted as to optimize patient and partner satisfaction and bridge the gap between patient and partner knowledge of postoperative pain.

Increasing abdominal wall thickness predicts complications in abdominally based breast reconstruction: A review of 106 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: Body mass index (BMI) has long been the proxy for patient selection in obese patients presenting for abdominally based breast reconstruction. BMI, however, fails to accurately reflect the distribution of abdominal adipose tissue. This study aims to quantify the effect of abdominal wall thickness on the incidence of post-operative complications and contrast abdominal wall thickness and BMI as predictors of post-operative morbidity. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 106 consecutive patients who underwent abdominally based breast reconstruction. Abdominal wall thickness was quantified using preoperative CT angiograms. Primary outcomes included delayed wound healing (abdomen and/or breast), flap fat necrosis, return to OR in 30 days, infection, and flap loss. RESULTS: Patients experiencing delayed abdominal wound healing (n=38), delayed breast wound healing (n=27), and flap fat necrosis (n=24) had significantly thicker abdominal wall measurements (p<0.0015). Of the 24 patients with palpable fat necrosis, 11 required excision. Increasing abdominal wall thickness significantly increased the odds of delayed abdominal wound healing (p=0.0005), delayed breast wound healing (p=0.0009), flap fat necrosis (p=0.0028), and infection (p=0.0198). Compared to BMI, abdominal wall thickness proved to be a more accurate predictor of delayed breast wound healing, any delayed wound healing, flap fat necrosis, and infection. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that as abdominal wall thickness increases, so does the risk of postoperative morbidity. Abdominal wall thickness outperformed BMI as a predictor of postoperative morbidity in several areas. This suggests that objective data obtained from preoperative CT scans may allow more accurate, individualized perioperative risk assessment.

Successful Salvage of Delayed Venous Congestion After DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.

Objective: Failure rates of microvascular autologous breast reconstruction are reportedly low. When failure of the microvascular anastomoses does occur, it is most likely to be salvaged if detected early. Flap compromise or venous congestion occurring several weeks later is uncommon and with significantly lower salvage rates. Methods: We present a unique case of delayed venous congestion of a single-perforator deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction in which the usual pedicle thrombosis was not identified. Presentation of the flap compromise occurred 72 hours postoperatively and again in the delayed setting 5 weeks after surgery, from suspected compression at the perforator level. Results: The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap was successfully salvaged with conservative measures, and the flap healed without fat necrosis or further complication. Conclusion: This case highlights the higher risk of flap compromise with reconstructions in a radiated field and potentially with single-perforator flaps.

Thoracic wall ischemia after repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm requiring large microvascular soft tissue reconstruction.

A 67-year-old man presented to the vascular service with a Crawford extent I thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. He underwent open thoracoabdominal aortic replacement from just distal to the left subclavian artery to just proximal to the origin of the superior mesenteric artery under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. His postoperative course was complicated by thoracic wall ischemia, resulting in a life-threatening defect of the chest wall that exposed lung parenchyma and the aortic graft. Successful microvascular soft tissue reconstruction was performed using an anterolateral thigh flap and arteriovenous loop. This is a case report of a large chest wall defect resulting from thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair. This case highlights the feasibility of microvascular reconstruction techniques to repair even the largest defects.