The outcome of ST-elevation myocardial infarction by sex: a retrospective cohort study.

We aimed to compare in-hospital mortality (IHM) of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) between male and females. We assessed the association of sex with IHM after AMI using simple and multivariate cox regression models. Results were presented as crude and adjusted hazard ratios along with their 95% confidence interval (HR; 95% CI). Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed females had a higher risk of death than males after ST-elevation MI (STEMI) (adjusted HR [95% CI]: 1.64 [1.15-2.36]; p = 0.007). In subgroup analysis by age group, this significantly increased risk was only observed in 50- to 64-year-old females. There were no significant differences between genders after non-STEMI and unspecified MI. Women aged 50 to 64 years had higher IHM after STEMI than men.

What is this study about? Cardiovascular diseases are one of the leading causes of death and disability in both males and females worldwide. Over the few last decades, with the development of novel techniques for the treatment of heart attacks, its prognosis has dramatically improved, although adverse outcomes remain high in female patients. Nevertheless, sex differences in death rates following heart attacks are still poorly understood. Hence, we compared the in-hospital death rate between male and female patients following a heart attack. What were the study results? Women are more likely to die during hospitalization following a heart attack in which the artery supplying the heart muscle was completely blocked, when compared with similarly aged men. This increased risk was most prominent between 50 to 64 years of age. However, the risk of in-hospital death was similar between men and women following a heart attack in which the artery supplying the heart muscle was not completely blocked. What do the results of the study mean? Women who have a heart attack with complete blockage of an artery supplying heart muscle are more likely to die during hospitalization when compared with men.

Psychological problems and reduced health-related quality of life in the COVID-19 survivors.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 survivors are predicted to experience the long-term consequences, including pulmonary, neurologic, cardiovascular, and mental health sequelae. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on studies assessing the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and psychiatric problems in COVID-19 survivors. METHODS: A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Google scholar databases using key terms COVID-19, PTSD, depression, anxiety, HRQoL, survivors. Pooled estimates were calculated using the random-effects models. RESULTS: A total of 21 eligible articles were included. The pooled prevalence of PTSD, depression, and anxiety among COVID-19 survivors were 18% (95% CI: 13 to 23%, I2=88.23%), 12% (8 to 17%, I2=91.84%), and 17% (12 to 22%, I2=97.07%), respectively. COVID-19 survivors compared to pre-COVID-19 time and controls showed reduced HRQoL and a lower score in Social Functioning (SF) and Role Physical (RP), and Role Emotional (RE) health. Females compared to males had a higher risk of experiencing mental health problems. Also, patients with severe disease had a higher prevalence of depression and anxiety, but not PTSD. LIMITATIONS: Regarding HRQoL, we were not able to perform a subgroup analysis due to a lack of data. Also, the included studies mainly used a self-rating scale to detect psychological problems in their study population. CONCLUSION: A significant number of patients who survived from COVID-19 might suffer from PTSD, depression, and anxiety beyond one month. Our systematic review also found evidence of reduced HQOL and limited social role in these survivors.