Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 18(5 Pt 1): 1030-8, 1988 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3385022

RESUMO

Because so little data are available on practices and procedures used by tanning salons, we studied, as customers, salons in a major city in Arkansas, the state where the practice began. We measured both ultraviolet A (UVA) and ultraviolet B (UVB) output at multiple reference points and found UVB always to be present, but at lower-than-expected levels. The highest irradiance was always at the umbilicus and the lowest was on the face. We evaluated compliance with accepted safety principles and federal guidelines and regulations; too often we found no eye protection and sometimes we found inadequate limits of exposure time. Persons with skin types I and II were sometimes promised a safe, effective UVA tan that would protect against sunburn. From our experience we concluded that if the industry is to continue, there is need for closer supervision and regulation.


Assuntos
Competência Profissional/normas , Queimadura Solar/prevenção & controle , Raios Ultravioleta/efeitos adversos , Equipamentos e Provisões/normas , Dispositivos de Proteção dos Olhos/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Doses de Radiação , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA