Angioplastía programada en octogenarios con enfermedad coronaria crónica. Resultados hospitalarios y en el seguimiento alejado / Programmed angioplasty in the elderly with chronic coronary disease

Cardiac vascular disease is the main cause of death in the elderly, and this factor is closely related to the increase and severity of the ischemic cardiopathy... The aim of the present report is to show the hospitalary results and the late follow-up in a population of patients older than 80 years, submitted to coronary angioplasty. It is concluded that the revascularization by mean of an elective angioplasty is a valid option for persons age 80 or older, with chronic ischemic cardiopathy, resulting in our experience in a high rate of primary success, and with an acceptable rate of complications

The greatest benefit of enoxaparin over unfractionated heparin in acute coronary syndromes is achieved in patients presenting with ST-segment changes: the Enoxaparin in Non-Q-Wave Coronary Events (ESSENCE) Electrocardiogram Core Laboratory Substudy.

BACKGROUND: We undertook a prospective electrocardiogram (ECG) substudy in the ESSENCE trial and hypothesized that patient subgroups with ST-segment deviation would experience greater benefit from enoxaparin, as compared with unfractionated heparin (UFH). METHODS: Of the 3171 patients in the trial, 3087 had a qualifying ECG available for analysis by the core laboratory. Patients were divided into 4 mutually exclusive groups based upon the qualifying ECG: (1) ST-segment elevation, (2) ST-segment depression, (3) T-wave inversions, or (4) others. RESULTS: The 30-day and 1-year primary outcomes (death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent angina) were significantly lower among patients with ST elevation or ST depression who received enoxaparin, as compared with UFH (20.8% vs 28.0%, P = .0019 and 32% vs 40.4%, P = .0011, respectively). The greatest absolute benefit of enoxaparin over UFH was seen in patients with ST depression (primary end point at 30 days, 24.6% vs 32.4%, P = .018; at 1 year, 35.5% vs 44.5%, P = .012). CONCLUSION: Specific recognition of patients with ST-segment depression appears to identify those not only at high risk for adverse outcome, but also patients most likely to derive the greatest benefit from enoxaparin, as compared with UFH therapy.