Cystic echinococcosis of the liver in Kazakhstan: The effectiveness of the PAIR method in comparison with laparoscopic and «open¼ surgical methods.

BACKGROUND: One of the urgent problems of surgical parasitology in the Republic of Kazakhstan is liver cystic echinococcosis. The study aimed to analyze the effectiveness and safety of the percutaneous treatment with different techniques in comparison with the results of laparoscopic and "open" surgical methods. METHODS: Retrospectively, we analyzed the outcome of 485 patients with active echinococcal cysts in the period from January 2017-July 2023. Indications for surgical treatment and the choice of the intervention method were based on this classification. Patients were conditionally divided into 3 groups: Laparoscopy-33, Laparotomy-319, PAIR-133. RESULTS: The duration of the operation in the PAIR was significantly shorter compared to the Laparotomy and Laparoscopy groups (55.4vs.225.2 and 215.3, p = 0.0001). There was no intraoperative blood loss in PAIR, whereas in Laparotomy and Laparoscopy there were 146.0 and 111.0. The postoperative stay of patients in PAIR is significantly shorter than in Laparotomy and Laparoscopy (3.8 compared to 7.5 and 6.4, p = 0.0001). The follow-up time averaged 39.8 months ± 21. There were no statistically significant differences in relapses. Laparotomy and PAIR groups had 11 (3.5 %) and 6 (4.5 %) relapses, respectively. CONCLUSION: In cystic echinococcosis of the liver types CE1, CE3a regardless of the localization, the optimal volume is a PAIR is characterized by a shorter postoperative stay of the patient, early recovery and cure. In the CE2, CE3b stages, laparoscopic pericystectomy is the most effective and safe in individual patients. In case of an intimate arrangement of cysts to tubular structures, the safest method is laparotomy.

Radical versus conservative surgical management for liver hydatid cysts: A single-center prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We prospectively compared the clinical outcomes of radical and conservative surgical procedures for primary liver hydatid cysts, additionally radical surgical procedures with and without the two-month administration of albendazole after the operation were compared. METHODS: Overall, 90 patients undergoing open surgical treatment for liver hydatid cysts were divided into three surgical groups: first group, patients who underwent radical surgery (pericystectomy) followed by albendazole treatment for 2 months following the operation group; second group, patients who underwent radical surgery(pericystectomy) without receiving albendazole after surgery group; third group, patients, who underwent conservative surgery (partial cystectomy) with albendazole treatment after surgery. The clinical outcomes and rate of recurrence were analyzed in follow-up period. RESULTS: The mean surgery duration in the Radical groups was significantly longer in comparison to the Conservative surgery + Albendazole group. (212.0 and 202.5 min vs. 173.2 min; p < 0.05). Blood loss in the Radical groups was significantly higher in comparison to the Conservative surgery + Albendazole group (218.3 and 174.6 ml vs. 67.2 ml; p < 0.05). However, postoperative complication rate in the Radical group was significantly lower in comparison to Conservative surgery + Albendazole group (13.3% [n = 4] and 6.7% [n = 2] vs. 36% [n = 11]; p < 0.05). The postoperative hospital stay in both Radical groups was significantly lower in comparison to the Conservative surgery + Albendazole group (7.9 and 7.4 days vs. 11.3 days; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In comparison to conservative surgery, radical surgery is a preferable treatment modality for patients with active liver hydatid cysts. Postoperative albendazole treatment is preferable, regardless of the type of surgical procedure.

Liver Transplant Experience in Syzganov's National Scientific Center of Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with chronic end-stage liver disease present a significant problem in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The liver transplant program was started in December 2011 and for May 2015, more than 80 liver transplant operations have been performed in 7 different hospitals of the country. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The main problem that hinders the wide implementation of liver transplant in our country is poor development of regularity of deceased-organ donation system. This is because of the specific mentality of the population and imperfect legislation. RESULTS: From 26 operated recipients, 19 lead a normal life (73.1%), receiving a minimal immunosuppressive therapy. In patients with cirrhosis of viral cause, there are no cases of viral hepatitis reinfection. CONCLUSIONS: Preliminary findings based on a small experience showed a good perceptiveness of developing of Liver Transplant program in Kazakhstan.