Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
1.
Value Health ; 2024 Jun 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38871026

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to quantify exposure to and financial impacts of PARPi treatments for eventually withdrawn ovarian cancer indications. METHODS: We identified in Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart database 1695 patients with ovarian cancer diagnoses who received olaparib, rucaparib, or niraparib between January 2015 and September 2021. We describe PARPi use and out-of-pocket (OOP), total health care, and PARPi spending among ovarian cancer patients with 3 or more prior lines of therapy (LOT). RESULTS: Of the 1695 patients who received PARPi, 254 were estimated to have been heavily pretreated and exposed to eventually withdrawn indications. Cumulative total medical and pharmacy costs for these patients were $53,392,184; PARPi costs accounted for 34%. Median PARPi cost per patient was $43,347. Cumulative out-of-pockets costs totaled $533,281. CONCLUSIONS: Potential patient harm, including financial toxicity, might have been mitigated through more stringent drug approval requirements.

2.
J Pharm Policy Pract ; 17(1): 2351003, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841118

RESUMO

Background: Withdrawals of drug indications may reveal potential inadequacies in the regulatory approval processes of new drugs. Understanding potential weaknesses of the regulatory approval process is paramount given the increasing use of expedited pathways. In this paper, we focus on three poly-ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (olaparib, rucaparib and niraparib) for the treatment of women with heavily pretreated, recurrent ovarian cancer, which were eventually withdrawn. Methods: We use a comparative case study approach to evaluate the regulatory histories of these drug indications in the US and Europe. Results: Two drug indications benefited from the FDA's accelerated approval pathway, which explicitly lowers the bar for evidence of efficacy at the time of approval. Following accelerated approval, manufacturers are mandated to conduct post-marketing studies to confirm clinical benefit. The FDA granted accelerated approval to olaparib and rucaparib based on data on surrogate endpoints and converted the approval to regular approval after the submission of additional data on surrogate endpoints from one of two required confirmatory trials, that is, without data on clinical benefit. Niraparib directly received regular approval based only on data on a surrogate endpoint. By contrast, the EMA granted conditional marketing authorisation to rucaparib and was quicker to restrict usage than the FDA. Conclusion: The regulatory histories of these drug indications highlight the need to reform the accelerated approval pathway by ensuring that post-marketing requirements are followed, and that regular approval is only based on evidence of clinical benefit.

3.
Gynecol Oncol ; 179: 97-105, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37956617

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the association between diet and angiogenic biomarkers in KpB mice, and the association between these markers, body mass index (BMI), and overall survival (OS) in high-grade serous cancers (HGSC). METHODS: Tumors previously obtained from KpB mice subjected to high-fat diets (HFD, n = 10) or low-fat diets (LFD, n = 10) were evaluated for angiogenesis based on CD-31 microvessel density (MVD). Data from prior microarray analysis (Agilent 244 K arrays) conducted in 10 mice were utilized to assess associations between diet and angiogenetic biomarkers. Agilent (mouse) and Affymetrix Human Genome U133a probes were linked to 162 angiogenic-related genes. The associations between biomarkers, BMI, and OS were evaluated in an HGSC internal database (IDB) (n = 40). Genes with unadjusted p < 0.05 were evaluated for association with OS in the TCGA-OV database (n = 339). RESULTS: There was no association between CD-31 and diet in mice (p = 0.66). Sixteen angiogenic-related genes passed the p < 0.05 threshold for association with HFD vs. LFD. Transforming growth factor-alpha (TGFA) demonstrated 72% higher expression in HFD vs. LFD mice (p = 0.04). Similar to the mouse study, in our HGSC IDB, higher TGFA expression correlated with higher BMI (p = 0.01) and shorter survival (p = 0.001). In the TCGA-OV dataset, BMI data was not available and there was no association between TGFA and OS (p = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: HFD and obesity may promote tumor progression via differential modulation of TGFA. We were unable to confirm this finding in the TCGA dataset. Further evaluation of TGFA is needed to determine if this is a target unique to obesity-driven HGSC.


Assuntos
Dieta Hiperlipídica , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Humanos , Camundongos , Animais , Feminino , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/genética , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/complicações , Dieta Hiperlipídica/efeitos adversos , Obesidade/genética , Obesidade/complicações , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/complicações , Expressão Gênica , Biomarcadores , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL
4.
Gynecol Oncol ; 175: 15-19, 2023 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37290247

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Elevated body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for endometrioid endometrial cancer and its precursor, endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). Our objective was to describe the association between BMI and age at EIN diagnosis. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with EIN from 2010 to 2020 at a large academic medical center. Patient characteristics were stratified by menopausal status and compared using a chi-square or t-test. We used linear regression to determine the parameter estimate (ß) and 95% confidence interval for the association between BMI and age at diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 513 patients with EIN; 503 (98%) had complete medical records. Premenopausal patients were more likely to be nulliparous and to have polycystic ovary syndrome than postmenopausal patients (both p ≤ 0.001). Postmenopausal patients were more likely to have hypertension, type 2 diabetes, and hyperlipidemia (all p ≤ 0.02). There was a significant linear association between BMI and age at diagnosis in premenopausal patients (ß = -0.19 (95% CI: -0.27, -0.10). In premenopausal patients, for every 1-unit increase in BMI, age at diagnosis decreased by 0.19 years. No association was observed in postmenopausal patients. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients with EIN, increasing BMI was associated with an earlier age at diagnosis in premenopausal patients. This data suggests consideration of endometrial sampling in younger patients with known risk factors for excess estrogen exposure.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hiperplasia Endometrial , Neoplasias do Endométrio , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Neoplasias do Endométrio/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Endométrio/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Massa Corporal , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Hiperplasia Endometrial/diagnóstico
5.
J Control Release ; 339: 521-530, 2021 11 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34648891

RESUMO

Non-surgical treatment options for low-grade endometrial cancer and precancerous lesions are a critical unmet need for women who wish to preserve fertility or are unable to undergo hysterectomy. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is frequently activated in endometrial cancers and has been associated with resistance to endocrine therapy, making it a compelling target for early stage disease. Oral everolimus, an inhibitor against mTORC1, has shown clinical benefit in advanced or recurrent disease but has severe adverse effects that may lead to treatment interruption or dose reduction. To overcome this, we developed a polymer-based intrauterine delivery system to achieve persistent, local delivery of everolimus without systemic exposure. In vivo studies, using a rat model, showed that a poly(propylene fumarate)-based rod loaded with everolimus achieved everolimus delivery to the endometrium with levels similar to oral administration, but with limited systemic exposure and up to 84 days of release. Biological activity of everolimus delivered with this system was confirmed, measured by reduced lumen epithelial cell height and PI3K pathway biomarkers. This study shows a promising new delivery approach for anti-cancer drugs for non-surgical treatment of low-grade endometrial cancer.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Sistemas de Liberação de Medicamentos , Everolimo , Animais , Everolimo/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Alvo Mecanístico do Complexo 1 de Rapamicina , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinases , Polímeros , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-akt , Ratos , Útero
6.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 224(3): 278.e1-278.e14, 2021 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32835719

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a well-known risk factor for endometrial cancer, but the mechanisms of obesity-related carcinogenesis are not well defined, particularly for premenopausal women. With the continuing obesity epidemic, increases in the incidence of endometrial cancer and a younger age of diagnosis are often attributed to a hyperestrogenic state created by hormone production in adipose tissue, but significant knowledge gaps remain. The balance of estrogen-responsive signals has not been defined in the endometrium of premenopausal women with obesity, where obesity may not create hyperestrogenism in the context of ovaries being the primary source of estrogen production. Obesity is associated with a state of low-grade, chronic inflammation that can promote tumorigenesis, and it is also known that hormonal changes alter the immune microenvironment of the endometrium. However, limited research has been conducted on endometrial immune-response changes in women who have an increased risk for cancer due to obesity. OBJECTIVE: Endometrial estrogen-regulated biomarkers, previously shown to be dysregulated in endometrial cancer, were evaluated in a cohort of premenopausal women to determine if obesity is associated with differences in the biomarker expression levels, which might reflect an altered risk of developing cancer. The expression of a multiplexed panel of immune-related genes was also evaluated for expression differences related to obesity. STUDY DESIGN: Premenopausal women with a body mass index of ≥30 kg/m2 (n=97) or a body mass index of ≤25 kg/m2 (n=33) were prospectively enrolled in this cross-sectional study, which included the assessment of serum metabolic markers and a timed endometrial biopsy for pathologic evaluation, hormone-regulated biomarker analysis, and immune response gene expression analysis. Medical and gynecologic histories were obtained. Endometrial gene expression markers were also compared across the body mass index groups in a previous cohort of premenopausal women with an inherited cancer risk (Lynch syndrome). RESULTS: In addition to known systemic metabolic differences, histologically normal endometria from women with obesity showed a decrease in gene expression of progesterone receptor (P=.0027) and the estrogen-induced genes retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (P=.008), insulin-like growth factor 1 (P=.016), and survivin (P=.042) when compared with women without obesity. The endometrial biomarkers insulin-like growth factor 1, survivin, and progesterone receptor remained statistically significant in multivariate linear regression models. In contrast, women with obesity and Lynch syndrome had an increased expression of insulin-like growth factor 1 (P=.017). There were no differences in endometrial proliferation, and limited endometrial immune differences were observed. CONCLUSION: When comparing premenopausal women with and without obesity in the absence of endometrial pathology or an inherited cancer risk, the expression of the endometrial biomarkers does not reflect a local hyperestrogenic environment, but it instead reflects a decreased cancer risk profile that may be indicative of a compensated state. In describing premenopausal endometrial cancer risk, it may be insufficient to attribute a high-risk state to obesity alone; further studies are warranted to evaluate individualized biomarker profiles for differences in the hormone-responsive signals or immune response. In patients with Lynch syndrome, the endometrial biomarker profile suggests that obesity further increases the risk of developing cancer.


Assuntos
Estrogênios/sangue , Obesidade/sangue , Pré-Menopausa/sangue , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangue , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Neoplasias do Endométrio/epidemiologia , Neoplasias do Endométrio/etiologia , Endométrio/metabolismo , Endométrio/patologia , Estrogênios/biossíntese , Feminino , Humanos , Obesidade/complicações , Fatores de Risco
7.
Gynecol Oncol ; 159(2): 483-490, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32863036

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Clinical trials evaluating universal PARP inhibitor (PARPi) frontline maintenance therapy for advanced stage ovarian cancer have reported progression-free survival (PFS) benefit. It is unclear whether PARPi maintenance therapy will universally enhance value (clinical benefits relative to cost of delivery). We compared a "PARPi-for-all" to a biomarker-directed frontline maintenance therapy approach as a value-based care strategy. METHODS: The cost of two frontline PARPi maintenance strategies, PARPi-for-all and biomarker-directed maintenance, was compared using modified Markov decision models simulating the study designs of the PRIMA, VELIA, and, PAOLA-1 trials. Outcomes of interest included overall costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) reported in US dollars per quality adjusted progression-free life-year (QA-PFY) gained. RESULTS: PARPi-for-all was more costly and provided greater PFS benefit than a biomarker-directed strategy for each trial. The mean cost per patient for the PARPi-for-all strategy was $166,269, $286,715, and $366,506 for the PRIMA, VELIA, and PAOLA-1 models, respectively. For the biomarker-directed strategy, the mean cost per patient was $98,188, $167,334, and $260,671 for the PRIMA, VELIA, and PAOLA-1 models. ICERs of PARPi-for-all compared to biomarker-directed maintenance were: $593,250/QA-PFY (PRIMA), $1,512,495/QA-PFY (VELIA), and $3,347,915/QA-PFY (PAOLA-1). At current drug pricing, there is no PFS improvement in a biomarker negative cohort that would make PARPi-for-all cost-effective compared to biomarker-directed maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the high costs of universal PARPi maintenance treatment, compared with a biomarker-directed PARPi strategy. Maintenance therapy in the front-line setting should be reserved for those with germline or somatic HRD mutations until the cost of therapy is significantly reduced.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/economia , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/tratamento farmacológico , Quimioterapia de Manutenção/economia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/economia , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Manutenção/métodos , Método de Monte Carlo , Neoplasias Ovarianas/economia , Intervalo Livre de Progressão
8.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 30(8): 1195-1202, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32616627

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: In the United States, trends in the initial treatment approach for ovarian cancer reflect a shift in paradigm toward the increased use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval cytoreductive surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the trends in surgical cytoreductive procedures in ovarian cancer patients who underwent either primary or interval cytoreductive surgery. METHODS: This retrospective, population-based study examined patients with stage III/IV ovarian cancer diagnosed between January 2000 and December 2013 identified using SEER-Medicare. Small or large bowel resection, ostomy creation, and upper abdominal procedures were identified using relevant billing codes and compared over time. A 1:1 primary and interval cytoreductive propensity matched cohort was created using demographic and clinical variables. 30-day complications and the use of acute care services were compared. RESULTS: A total of 5417 women were identified. 34% underwent bowel resections, 16% ostomy creation, and 8% upper abdominal procedures. There was an increase in bowel resections and upper abdominal procedures from 2000 to 2013 in patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery. Compared with patients who received primary cytoreduction, patients who underwent interval cytoreductive surgery were less likely to undergo bowel resection (OR=0.50; 95% CI [0.41, 0.61]) or ostomy creation (OR=0.48; 95% CI [0.42, 0.56]). Upper abdominal procedures did not differ between groups. For patients who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery, these procedures were associated with intensive care unit stay (4.6% vs <2%, P<0.01). In both primary and interval cytoreductive surgery patients, the receipt of bowel and upper abdominal procedures was associated with multiple 30-day postoperative complications and higher rates of readmission and emergency room visits. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of upper abdominal procedures in ovarian cancer patients increased from 2000 to 2013. Interval cytoreductive surgery was associated with decreased likelihood of bowel surgery. In matched primary and interval cytoreductive surgery cohorts, the receipt of these procedures were associated with the increased likelihood of postoperative complications and use of acute care services.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/tendências , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/secundário , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/estatística & dados numéricos , Diafragma/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hepatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Intestinos/cirurgia , Terapia Neoadjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Pancreatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esplenectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
10.
Gynecol Oncol ; 154(2): 405-410, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31208738

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) is a national survey of inpatient experience. This study evaluated the association between HCAHPS survey results and outcomes in gynecologic cancer surgery. METHODS: This observational study used HCAHPS survey data from 2009 to 2011 to assign hospitals into score terciles. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to identify admissions during the same time period for gynecologic cancer-specific surgeries. Data sources were linked at the hospital level. Postoperative complications, mortality, and prolonged length of stay were compared between higher and lower scoring hospitals. Complications were grouped as 'surgical', 'medical', or 'care team'. Mixed effects models were used to evaluate the associations between hospitals' HCAHPS scores and outcomes after adjustment for patient and hospital-level variables. RESULTS: 17,509 linked encounters in 651 hospitals across the U.S. were identified, with 51% uterine, 40% ovarian, and 9% cervical cancer surgical admissions. In-hospital mortality was lower in hospitals in the top HCAHPS score terciles compared to bottom HCAHPS score tercile (odds ratio (OR) 0.54, 95% CI: 0.31-0.94). Surgery in higher scoring HCAHPS hospitals was associated with less 'surgical' complications (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.98). No association was found between 'medical', 'care team', overall complications, or prolonged hospitalization (p > 0.05) and HCAHPS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Gynecologic oncology surgeries performed in top HCAHPS tercile hospitals were associated with lower in-hospital mortality and surgical complications compared to surgeries performed in bottom tercile hospitals. Associations between HCAHPS scores and other adverse events were not seen.


Assuntos
Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Avaliação de Resultados da Assistência ao Paciente , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/cirurgia , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais/normas , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/mortalidade
11.
Obstet Gynecol ; 133(4): 795-802, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30870286

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether use of a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor is cost effective for maintenance treatment of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: A decision analysis model compared four maintenance strategies: 1) observation, 2) BRCA germline mutation testing and selective treatment of carriers (gBRCA only), 3) BRCA germline and tumor homologous recombination deficiency testing and selective treatment of either BRCA carriers or those with tumor HRD (gBRCA and HRD only), and 4) treat all with niraparib to progression (treat all). Costs were estimated in 2016 U.S. dollars. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were in dollars per progression-free quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). One-way sensitivity analyses tested multiple assumptions. RESULTS: Maintenance poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor was costlier and more effective than observation. Mean costs and progression-free QALYs were $827 and 3.4 months for observation, $46,157 and 5.7 for a BRCA-only strategy, $109,368 and 8.5 for a gBRCA and homologous recombination deficiency-only strategy, and $169,127 and 8.8 for a treat-all strategy. gBRCA-only had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $243,092/progression-free QALY compared with observation; other strategies did not approach cost effectiveness. Using the current U.S. Food and Drug Administration label for maintenance poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor regardless of biomarker status, the third-party payer cost per month (28-day supply) would need to be reduced from approximately $14,700 to $3,600 to be considered cost effective compared with observation using a willingness to pay threshold of $100,000/progression-free QALY. CONCLUSION: Maintenance poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer is not cost effective. Treatment of patients with BRCA mutation alone or with homologous recombination deficiency-positive tumors are preferred strategies compared with a treat-all strategy. Lowering the cost may make selective niraparib maintenance therapy cost effective compared with observation.


Assuntos
Aprovação de Drogas/economia , Quimioterapia de Manutenção/economia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/economia , Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligases/genética , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/economia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/genética , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/mortalidade , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/patologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/genética , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/mortalidade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Inibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribose) Polimerases/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento , Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligases/efeitos dos fármacos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/economia
12.
Gynecol Oncol ; 150(3): 451-459, 2018 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29961559

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) may reduce perioperative morbidity in women undergoing primary treatment for ovarian cancer. We evaluated patterns of use and outcomes in a population-based cohort of elderly women with ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS: A cohort of patients ≥66 years old diagnosed between 2000 and 2013 with stage III-IV epithelial OC who received surgery and platinum/taxane chemotherapy for primary treatment was identified from the SEER-Medicare database. Propensity-score matching methods were used to examine differences in outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare overall survival (OS) in the matched cohort. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2013, 22.5% of older women received NACT. The use of NACT increased over time from 16% in 2000 to 35.4% in 2013 (p < .0001). Among women who received PCS, the rate of ostomy creation was higher compared with NACT (23.3% vs. 10.8%, p < .0001). Infectious and other surgical complications were higher among those who had PCS, regardless of stage. Median OS of women III ovarian cancer who underwent PCS was longer compared with NACT (38.8 vs. 28 months, p ≤ .0001). There were no survival differences between NACT and PCS in women with stage IV disease (29.4 vs. 29.8 months, p = .61) or for women aged >80. CONCLUSION: Careful consideration should be given to older patients prior to undergoing PCS. Survival outcomes were similar for patients with stage IV disease, although NACT was associated with decreased perioperative morbidity compared with PCS. Among women with stage III disease, PCS was associated with improved overall survival, but higher rates of perioperative morbidity and acute care.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução , Terapia Neoadjuvante/tendências , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/secundário , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/tendências , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Programa de SEER , Taxa de Sobrevida
14.
Obstet Gynecol ; 128(4): 747-753, 2016 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27607867

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD) as an endometrial cancer prevention strategy in obese women. METHODS: A modified Markov model was used to compare IUD placement at age 50 with usual care among women with a body mass index (BMI, kg/m) 40 or greater or BMI 30 or greater. The effects of obesity on incidence and survival were incorporated. The IUD was assumed to confer a 50% reduction in cancer incidence over 5 years. Costs of IUD and cancer care were included. Clinical outcomes were cancer diagnosis and deaths from cancer. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated in 2015 U.S. dollars per year of life saved. One-way and two-way sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo probabilistic analyses were performed. RESULTS: For a 50 year old with BMI 40 or greater, the IUD strategy is costlier and more effective than usual care with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $74,707 per year of life saved. If the protective effect of the levonorgestrel IUD is assumed to be 10 years, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio decreases to $37,858 per year of life saved. In sensitivity analysis, a levonorgestrel IUD that reduces cancer incidence by at least 68% in women with BMIs of 40 or greater or costs less than $500 is potentially cost-effective. For BMI 30 or greater, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of IUD strategy is $137,223 per year of life saved compared with usual care. In Monte Carlo analysis, IUD placement for BMI 40 or greater is cost-effective in 50% of simulations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per year of life saved. CONCLUSION: The levonorgestrel IUD is a potentially cost-effective strategy for prevention of deaths from endometrial cancer in obese women.


Assuntos
Anticoncepcionais Femininos/economia , Anticoncepcionais Femininos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias do Endométrio/prevenção & controle , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados/economia , Levanogestrel/economia , Levanogestrel/uso terapêutico , Obesidade/complicações , Índice de Massa Corporal , Análise Custo-Benefício , Neoplasias do Endométrio/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Econômicos , Método de Monte Carlo
15.
Gynecol Oncol ; 139(2): 275-82, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26348313

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of adjuvant therapy after primary surgery for stage I-III uterine carcinosarcoma (CS). METHODS: A multi-institutional retrospective study of women with stage I-III CS was conducted. Analyses were stratified by stage (I/II and III). Patients were categorized according to adjuvant therapy: observation (OBS), radiation (RT), chemotherapy (CT) or multimodal therapy (CT+RT). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: 303 patients were identified across four institutions: 195 with stage I/II and 108 with stage III disease. In stage I/II disease, 75 (39.9%) received OBS, 33 (17.6%) CT, 37 (19.7%) RT, and 43 (22.9%) CT+RT. OBS was associated with a fourfold increased risk of death compared to CT (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR)=4.48, p=0.003). Patients receiving CT+RT had significantly improved PFS compared to those receiving CT alone (aHR=0.43, p=0.04), but no difference in OS. In the stage III cohort, 16 (15.0%) received OBS, 34 (31.8%) CT, 20 (18.7%) RT, and 37 (34.6%) CT+RT. OBS was associated with worse OS and PFS compared to CT (OS: aHR=2.46, p=0.04; PFS: aHR=2.39, p=0.03, respectively). A potential improvement in PFS was seen for those treated with CT+RT compared to CT alone, however it was not statistically significant (aHR=0.53, p=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Observation after surgery was associated with poor outcomes in uterine CS compared to CT and RT alone. Multimodality therapy for women with stage I/II disease was associated with improved PFS compared to chemotherapy alone. Novel treatment options are needed to improve outcomes in this aggressive disease.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinossarcoma/terapia , Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante , Histerectomia , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carboplatina/administração & dosagem , Carcinossarcoma/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Ifosfamida/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Uterinas/patologia
16.
Gynecol Oncol ; 138(3): 694-9, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26072441

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the potential cost-effectiveness of an intervention to improve adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-based care for ovarian cancer. METHODS: A modified Markov model with a 5-year time horizon estimated the potential cost-effectiveness of an intervention (AD-INT) to improve NCCN-guideline adherence compared to status quo (SQ) levels of adherence. Data were obtained from a population-based analysis of National Cancer Data Base records for ovarian cancer diagnosed from 1998 to 2002 (N=47,160). Cohorts were defined by race and adherence to NCCN guideline-based care. Costs were estimated using 2014 Medicare reimbursements. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated in 2014 US dollars per year of life saved (YLS) using the standard threshold of $50,000/YLS. We simulated an AD-INT that reduced non-adherence by 25% and cost at least $100 per patient. One-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Although the individual components of guideline-adherent care are more costly than non-adherent care, a reasonably effective AD-INT is also highly likely to be cost-effective. An AD-INT costing $100 per patient and reducing non-adherence by 25% is cost-effective with an ICER of $22/YLS compared with SQ, while interventions costing over $1000 remain cost-effective, up to a per-patient intervention cost of up to $8000 (targeting only blacks) or $4000 (targeting all patients). CONCLUSIONS: An ovarian cancer intervention that moderately decreases racial disparities in NCCN guideline adherent care or improves adherence for all is potentially cost-effective. Further research may determine which modifiable factors may be targeted to help reduce adherence disparities.


Assuntos
Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Modelos Econômicos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/economia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Estados Unidos
17.
Gynecol Oncol ; 119(1): 38-42, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20609464

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the morbidity and mortality associated with extensive upper abdominal surgery (EUAS) performed during primary cytoreduction for advanced ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent EUAS during primary cytoreduction for advanced ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer at our institution from 1/01 to 12/06. Major grade 3-5 complications were those that led to invasive radiologic intervention, re-operation, unplanned ICU admission, chronic disability, or death within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: There were 141 eligible patients, with a median age of 60 years (range, 38-82). The majority of patients had stage IIIC disease, 103 (73%); serous histology, 131 (93%); and ascites, 118 (84%). There were 229 EUAS procedures performed-diaphragm peritonectomy, 101 (72%); splenectomy, 45 (32%); full-thickness diaphragm resection, 19 (14%); partial hepatectomy, 18 (13%); distal pancreatectomy, 17 (12%); cholecystectomy, 15 (11%); and resection of porta hepatis tumor, 14 (10%). Cytoreductive outcomes were: no gross residual, 42 (30%); residual ≤ 1cm, 85 (60%); and residual >1cm, 14 (10%). Grade 3-5 complications occurred in 31 (22%) patients, including 2 mortalities (1.4%). In 21/31 (68%), the complication was successfully managed with percutaneous drainage of infected or non-infected collections. Overall median survival for all patients was 57 months. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of major morbidity and mortality following EUAS for primary cytoreduction were 22% and 1.4%, respectively. Approximately two-thirds of complications were readily managed by percutaneous drainage of collections. With an overall median survival of 57 months in a cohort of patients with a large tumor burden, this rate of morbidity and mortality appears acceptable.


Assuntos
Neoplasias das Tubas Uterinas/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias das Tubas Uterinas/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/patologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...