Less frequent dosing of erythropoiesis stimulating agents in patients undergoing dialysis: a European multicentre cost study.

OBJECTIVE: To calculate the variable costs involved with the process of delivering erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESA) in European dialysis practices. METHODS: A conceptual model was developed to classify the processes and sub-processes followed in the pharmacy (ordering from supplier, receiving/storing/delivering ESA to the dialysis unit), dialysis unit (dose determination, ordering, receipt, registration, storage, administration, registration) and waste disposal unit. Time and material costs were recorded. Labour costs were derived from actual local wages while material costs came from the facilities' accounting records. Activities associated with ESA administration were listed and each activity evaluated to determine if dosing frequency affected the amount of resources required. RESULTS: A total of 21 centres in 8 European countries supplied data for 142 patients (mean) per hospital (range 42-648). Patients received various ESA regimens (thrice-weekly, twice-weekly, once-weekly, once every 2 weeks and once-monthly). Administering ESA every 2 weeks, the mean costs per patient per year for each process and the estimates of the percentage reduction in costs obtainable, respectively, were: pharmacy labour (10.1 euro, 39%); dialysis unit labour (66.0 euro, 65%); dialysis unit materials (4.11 euro, 61%) and waste unit materials (0.43 euro, 49%). LIMITATION: Impact on financial costs was not measured. CONCLUSION: ESA administration has quantifiable labour and material costs which are affected by dosing frequency.

Ready-to-use injection preparations versus conventional reconstituted admixtures: economic evaluation in a real-life setting.

OBJECTIVE: To measure, in a real-life setting, the benefits of using ready-to-use (RTU) injection preparations compared with conventional reconstituted admixtures (Admix) in terms of cost savings. DESIGN AND PERSPECTIVE: An economic model was developed, based on a randomised study. The perspective of the economic evaluation was that of the hospital administration. A microcosting approach was used to determine costs. SETTING: Department of Cardiac Surgery at the Charleroi University Hospital in Belgium. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-eight patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass were randomised to Admix dobutamine or to the RTU dobutamine group and were followed up during 24 hours after initiation of dobutamine therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: Nursing time was reduced by 32% in the RTU group compared with the Admix group. Material cost was also reduced and the overall cost savings in the RTU group amounted to a 60% reduction in the cost of the conventional Admix process (p<0.001). When drug cost was included in the equation, cost savings varied from 1.60 euros (EUR) to EUR21.40 per patient depending on dosage. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of safety and efficacy. A user satisfaction survey showed that medical staff especially welcomed improved ease of preparation and potential for prevention of errors and risks of handling. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the potential for RTU forms to reduce nursing time associated with preparation and administration of intravenous admixtures and to enable overall cost savings.