American Society of Clinical Oncology 2022 Annual Meeting Highlights for Radiation Oncologists.

The American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting is the largest multidisciplinary oncology-focused conference in the world. With almost 5000 total abstracts in 2022, it is difficult for individuals to evaluate all the results. Here we present a review of 28 selected abstracts, across all disease sites, focusing on those of greatest relevance to radiation oncologists.

Evaluation of 5 Fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Osseous Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastases.

OBJECTIVES: The best fractionation for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) metastases has not been well defined. In addition, the literature on outcomes using 5-fraction SBRT in the setting of osseous metastases has not been well reported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with 69 RCC osseous metastases were treated using 5-fraction SBRT at a single institution using 2 dose-fractionation schemes. Overall survival and local-control (LC) outcomes of the 2 fractionation schemes were studied using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Of the 69 lesions included in the study, 20 were treated with 30 grays (Gy) in 5 fractions and 49 were treated with 40 Gy in 5 fractions. The median age of patients at diagnosis was 58.4 years. The 1-year LC rate for all treated lesions was 85.5% (59/69) with an LC of 90% (18/20) for lesions receiving 30 Gy and 83.7% (41/49) in lesions receiving 40 Gy. There was no statistically significant difference in 1-year LC rate between the 2 fractionation schemes (P-value, 0.553). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with osseous RCC metastases undergoing 5 fractions of SBRT had favorable LC outcomes. There was no difference in survival or LC between the 40 Gy and 30 Gy treatment arms.

Radiation Fibrosis After Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Osseous Metastases: A Case Report.

Radiation-induced fibrosis is a potentially severe late complication after high-dose radiotherapy. Over the last decade, there has been increasing use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to treat both primary and metastatic malignancies. While there has been evolving evidence of appropriate dose constraints for certain organs receiving hypofractionated radiotherapy, the risk, and appropriate dose constraints to limit the risk of radiation-induced muscle fibrosis are poorly defined. In this report, two patients are presented who underwent SBRT for osseous oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma. While the treatment was well-tolerated with no acute toxicities and complete local control of the metastasis, both patients experienced late toxicity of radiation-induced fibrosis in the adjacent musculature. In both cases, toxicity was nonresponsive to medical interventions and was severe enough to require surgical resection of the affected tissue. Following surgery, both patients reported improved pain relief and mobility. Further studies are needed to explore the dose constraints that may reduce the risk of radiation-induced muscle fibrosis in five-fraction treatment.

Academic patterns of practice regarding CT simulation scans and radiology review.

OBJECTIVE: Currently, there are no consensus guidelines about handling incidental radiological findings on radiotherapy planning CT simulation scans. Retrospective studies analyzing incidental findings on CT simulations show a small, but not insignificant, rate of both oncologic and non-oncologic findings. These findings may have medico-legal, financial, and clinical implications. Given a lack of guidelines, we obtained a formal survey of multiple academic institutions to evaluate how CT simulations are handled in regard to incidental findings. METHODS: A formal survey was developed consisting of 12 questions related to institutional practices regarding CT simulation scans. From 7/18/21 to 8/27/21 and 5/6/22 to 5/24/22, the survey was administered electronically by REDCap to key personnel at Academic Radiation Oncology Programs identified through the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) with inclusion criteria including an active ACGME approved Radiation Oncology residency program. RESULTS: In total, 88 academic radiation oncology programs were surveyed with total of 45 responses (51%). 1 out of 45 departments who responded has formal guidelines regarding workup of incidental findings. There is variability about sending CT simulation scans for official radiology review if an incidental finding is identified. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a measurable rate of incidental findings on radiotherapy planning CT simulations and their possible implications, our survey illustrates a likely need for consensus recommendations for handling such findings to improve patient care and safety.

Independent Predictors for Hospitalization-Associated Radiation therapy Interruptions.

Purpose: Radiation treatment interruption associated with unplanned hospitalization remains understudied. The intent of this study was to benchmark the frequency of hospitalization-associated radiation therapy interruptions (HARTI), characterize disease processes causing hospitalization during radiation, identify factors predictive for HARTI, and localize neighborhood environments associated with HARTI at our academic referral center. Methods and Materials: This retrospective review of electronic health records provided descriptive statistics of HARTI event rates at our institutional practice. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models were developed to identify significant factors predictive for HARTI. Causes of hospitalization were established from primary discharge diagnoses. HARTI rates were mapped according to patient residence addresses. Results: Between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2017, 197 HARTI events (5.3%) were captured across 3729 patients with 727 total missed treatments. The 3 most common causes of hospitalization were malnutrition/dehydration (n = 28; 17.7%), respiratory distress/infection (n = 24; 13.7%), and fever/sepsis (n = 17; 9.7%). Factors predictive for HARTI included African-American race (odds ratio [OR]: 1.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-2.06; P = .018), Medicaid/uninsured status (OR: 2.05; 95% CI, 1.32-3.15; P = .0013), Medicare coverage (OR: 1.7; 95% CI, 1.21-2.39; P = .0022), lung (OR: 5.97; 95% CI, 3.22-11.44; P < .0001), and head and neck (OR: 5.6; 95% CI, 2.96-10.93; P < .0001) malignancies, and prescriptions >20 fractions (OR: 2.23; 95% CI, 1.51-3.34; P < .0001). HARTI events clustered among Medicaid/uninsured patients living in urban, low-income, majority African-American neighborhoods, and patients from middle-income suburban communities, independent of race and insurance status. Only the wealthiest residential areas demonstrated low HARTI rates. Conclusions: HARTI disproportionately affected socioeconomically disadvantaged urban patients facing a high treatment burden in our catchment population. A complementary geospatial analysis also captured the risk experienced by middle-income suburban patients independent of race or insurance status. Confirmatory studies are warranted to provide scale and context to guide intervention strategies to equitably reduce HARTI events.

The Use of Low-Dose Radiation Therapy in Osteoarthritis: A Review.

Despite its clinical use and investigation in other countries, low dose radiation therapy (LDRT) in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) is minimally used in the United States (US). Numerous recent studies published outside the US have shown moderate to long-term pain relief and improvement of mobility after treatment with LDRT for joints affected by OA. Here, we review the most recent literature published on the use of LDRT in OA. We provide a brief outline on the epidemiology, pathophysiology, current treatments, and health care burden of OA within the US. We provide a brief history of the historic use of LDRT in the US as well as a history of LDRT within the modern era of radiation oncology, discuss criticisms of LDRT including recently published randomized trials questioning its benefit as well as the risk of secondary malignancy from LDRT, and provide an outline of treatment planning considerations and recommendations regarding dose and fractionation, energy, beam arrangements, and immobilization techniques. LDRT has been shown to be a cost-effective, noninvasive treatment with minimal side effects. Further investigation into the potential role in the treatment of OA with modern LDRT is recommended.

Location as Destiny: Identifying Geospatial Disparities in Radiation Treatment Interruption by Neighborhood, Race, and Insurance.

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy interruption (RTI) worsens cancer outcomes. Our purpose was to benchmark and map RTI across a region in the United States with known cancer outcome disparities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All radiation therapy (RT) treatments at our academic center were cataloged. Major RTI was defined as ≥5 unplanned RT appointment cancellations. Univariate and multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses identified associated factors. Major RTI was mapped by patient residence. A 2-sided P value <.0001 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2017, a total of 3754 patients received RT, of whom 3744 were eligible for analysis: 962 patients (25.8%) had ≥2 RT interruptions and 337 patients (9%) had major RTI. Disparities in major RTI were seen across Medicaid versus commercial/Medicare insurance (22.5% vs 7.2%; P < .0001), low versus high predicted income (13.0% vs 5.9%; P < .0001), Black versus White race (12.0% vs 6.6%; P < .0001), and urban versus suburban treatment location (12.0% vs 6.3%; P < .0001). On multivariable analysis, increased odds of major RTI were seen for Medicaid patients (odds ratio [OR], 3.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.25-5.00; P < .0001) versus those with commercial/Medicare insurance and for head and neck (OR, 3.74; 95% CI, 2.56-5.46; P < .0001), gynecologic (OR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.09-5.15; P < .0001), and lung cancers (OR, 3.12; 95% CI, 1.96-4.97; P < .0001) compared with breast cancer. Major RTI was mapped to urban, majority Black, low-income neighborhoods and to rural, majority White, low-income regions. CONCLUSIONS: Radiation treatment interruption disproportionately affects financially and socially vulnerable patient populations and maps to high-poverty neighborhoods. Geospatial mapping affords an opportunity to correlate RT access on a neighborhood level to inform potential intervention strategies.

Managing local-regional failure in children with high-risk neuroblastoma: A single institution experience.

BACKGROUND: Intensification of systemic therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HRNB) has resulted in improved local control and overall survival (OS) leaving potential for de-escalation of primary site radiotherapy. The utility of primary site de-escalation should be evaluated in the context of potential for successful local-regional salvage. We evaluated salvage strategies and outcomes in patients with HRNB with local-regional recurrence as a component of first failure. METHODS: Twenty of 89 patients with HRNB experienced local-regional recurrence as a component of first relapse after chemotherapy, radiotherapy, surgery, and stem cell transplant from 1997 to 2013. We reviewed salvage therapy strategies and disease control, and report on the impact of local therapy as salvage for local-regional relapse. RESULTS: Six of 20 patients with local-regional failure (LRF) were alive after a median follow-up of 13 years (range, 0.9-25.2 years). Median OS was 4.6 years (95% CI, 0.6 to not reached) versus 0.6 years (95% CI, 0.05-2.6) after LRF with and without distant failure, respectively (P = 0.03). OS in patients receiving salvage radiotherapy was comparable to those receiving initial adjuvant but no salvage radiotherapy. Time to first failure and death was significantly impacted by the intensity of frontline systemic therapy (P = 0.03). Salvage radiotherapy reduced the hazard for subsequent LRF (hazard ratio 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.9, P = 0.04) but not OS (P = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the potential of local control strategies at first failure in patients with LRF when primary site radiotherapy was initially omitted, and delineates potential selection factors which may further improve the therapeutic ratio.

Is there a role for salvage re-irradiation in pediatric patients with locoregional recurrent rhabdomyosarcoma? Clinical outcomes from a multi-institutional cohort.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Limited data exist detailing the role of salvage reirradiation following local-regional recurrence (LR) in previously irradiated pediatric patients with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated outcomes and prognostic factors in a multi-institutional cohort of 23 patients with LR-only (N = 19) or LR with distant failure (N = 4) RMS managed with (N = 12) or without (N = 11) re-irradiation who were treated from 1996 to 2012. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 4.6 years from LR, 7 (30%) patients were alive and 5 (22%) had no evidence of disease. Median OS and PFS from LR were 19.3 and 16.9 months, respectively. LFFS and DFFS at 3 years from relapse were 54% and 56%, respectively. Salvage re-irradiation occurred in 12 (52%) patients, with 9 (75%) receiving resection before re-irradiation. Patients classified as low-risk at diagnosis with favorable primary tumor location had improved 3-year PFS 80% (95% CI 51.6-100%) vs. 47.1% (95% CI 27.3-81.2%), p = 0.066], and OS 80% [(95% CI 22.4-100%) vs. 47.1% (95% CI 27.3-81.3%), p = 0.051] following LR. Median LFFS and OS in unirradiated vs. re-irradiated patients was 12.4 vs. 19.6 (p = 0.1) and 18.8 vs. 26.1 months (p = 0.46). No patients experienced ≥grade 4 acute toxicity from re-irradiation. LR failure was a component of cancer-related death in 60% vs. 40% of the unirradiated and re-irradiated group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Salvage re-irradiation appears tolerable with acceptable morbidity and may reduce the risk of subsequent LR as a component of death in patients with LR RMS.

Quality of prostate cancer screening information on the websites of nationally recognized cancer centers and health organizations.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to survey the accessibility and quality of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening information from National Cancer Institute (NCI) cancer center and public health organization Web sites. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We surveyed the December 1, 2016, version of all 63 NCI-designated cancer center public Web sites and 5 major online clearinghouses from allied public/private organizations (cancer.gov, cancer.org, PCF.org, USPSTF.org, and CDC.gov). Web sites were analyzed according to a 50-item list of validated health care information quality measures. Web sites were graded by 2 blinded reviewers. Interrater agreement was confirmed by Cohen kappa coefficient. RESULTS: Ninety percent of Web sites addressed PSA screening. Cancer center sites covered 45% of topics surveyed, whereas organization Web sites addressed 70%. All organizational Web pages addressed the possibility of false-positive screening results; 41% of cancer center Web pages did not. Forty percent of cancer center Web pages also did not discuss next steps if a PSA test was positive. Only 6% of cancer center Web pages were rated by our reviewers as "superior" (eg, addressing >75% of the surveyed topics) versus 20% of organizational Web pages. Interrater agreement between our reviewers was high (kappa coefficient = 0.602). CONCLUSION: NCI-designated cancer center Web sites publish lower quality public information about PSA screening than sites run by major allied organizations. Nonetheless, information and communication deficiencies were observed across all surveyed sites. In an age of increasing patient consumerism, prospective prostate cancer patients would benefit from improved online PSA screening information from provider and advocacy organizations. Validated cancer patient Web educational standards remain an important, understudied priority.