Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 58
Filtrar
1.
J Biol Chem ; 299(12): 105453, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37956771

RESUMO

The ETS transcription factor ERG is aberrantly expressed in approximately 50% of prostate tumors due to chromosomal rearrangements such as TMPRSS2/ERG. The ability of ERG to drive oncogenesis in prostate epithelial cells requires interaction with distinct coactivators, such as the RNA-binding protein EWS. Here, we find that ERG has both direct and indirect interactions with EWS, and the indirect interaction is mediated by the poly-A RNA-binding protein PABPC1. PABPC1 directly bound both ERG and EWS. ERG expression in prostate cells promoted PABPC1 localization to the nucleus and recruited PABPC1 to ERG/EWS-binding sites in the genome. Knockdown of PABPC1 in prostate cells abrogated ERG-mediated phenotypes and decreased the ability of ERG to activate transcription. These findings define a complex including ERG and the RNA-binding proteins EWS and PABPC1 that represents a potential therapeutic target for ERG-positive prostate cancer and identify a novel nuclear role for PABPC1.


Assuntos
Proteína I de Ligação a Poli(A) , Próstata , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-ets , Proteína EWS de Ligação a RNA , Humanos , Masculino , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Núcleo Celular/metabolismo , Genoma Humano/genética , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/genética , Proteínas de Fusão Oncogênica/metabolismo , Proteína I de Ligação a Poli(A)/metabolismo , Próstata/citologia , Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/metabolismo , Ligação Proteica , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-ets/metabolismo , Proteína EWS de Ligação a RNA/metabolismo , Ativação Transcricional , Regulador Transcricional ERG/genética , Regulador Transcricional ERG/metabolismo
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(6): e2113224, 2021 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34110392

RESUMO

Importance: After US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of a new drug, sponsors can submit additional clinical data to obtain supplemental approval for use for new indications. Objective: To characterize pivotal trials supporting recent supplemental new indication approvals of drugs and biologics by the FDA and to compare them with pivotal trials that supported these therapeutics' original indication approvals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a cross-sectional study characterizing pivotal trials supporting supplemental indication approvals by the FDA between 2017 and 2019 and pivotal trials that supported these therapeutics' original indication approvals. Data analysis was performed from August to October 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Number and design of pivotal trials supporting both supplemental and original indication approvals. Results: From 2017 to 2019, the FDA approved 146 supplemental indications for 107 therapeutics on the basis of 181 pivotal efficacy trials. The median (interquartile range) number of trials per supplemental indication was 1 (1-1). Most trials used either placebo (77 trials [42.5%; 95% CI, 35.6%-49.8%]) or active comparators (65 trials [35.9%; 95% CI, 29.3%-43.1%]), and most of these multigroup trials were randomized (141 trials [99.3%; 95% CI, 96.0%-100.0%]) and double-blinded (106 trials [74.5%; 95% CI, 66.6%-81.0%]); 80 trials (44.2%; 95 CI, 37.2%-51.5%) used clinical outcomes as the primary efficacy end point. There was no difference between oncology therapies and those approved for other therapeutic areas to have supplemental indication approvals be based on at least 2 pivotal trials (11.5% vs 20.6%; difference, 9.1%; 95% CI, 2.9%-21.0%; P = .10). Similarly, there was no difference in use of randomization (98.3% vs 100.0%; difference, 1.7%; 95% CI, 1.6%-5.0%; P = .43) among multigroup trials, although these trials were less likely to be double-blinded (50.8% vs 92.3%; difference, 41.5%; 95% CI, 27.4%-55.5%; P < .001); overall, these trials were less likely to use either placebo or active comparators (64.9% vs 86.7%; difference, 21.8% 95% CI, 9.8%-33.9%; P < .001) or to use clinical outcomes as their primary efficacy end point (27.5% vs 61.1%; difference, 33.6%; 95% CI, 14.1%-40.9%; P < .001) and were longer (median [interquartile range], 17 [6-48] weeks vs 95 [39-146] weeks). Original approvals were more likely than supplemental indication approvals to be based on at least 2 pivotal trials (44.0% [95% CI, 33.7%-42.6%] vs 15.8% [95% CI, 10.7%-22.5%]; difference, 28.2%; 95% CI, 17.6%-39.6%; P < .001) and less likely to be supported by at least 1 trial of 12 months' duration (27.6% [95% CI, 17.9%-35.0%] vs 54.8% [95% CI, 46.7%-62.6%]; difference, 27.2%; 95% CI, 14.5%-37.8%; P < .001). Pivotal trial designs were otherwise not significantly different. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the number and design of the pivotal trials supporting supplemental indication approvals by the FDA varied across therapeutic areas, with the strength of evidence for cancer indications weaker than that for other indications. There was little difference in the design characteristics of the pivotal trials supporting supplemental indication and original approvals.


Assuntos
Produtos Biológicos/normas , Estudos Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Aprovação de Drogas/métodos , Reposicionamento de Medicamentos/normas , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/normas , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , United States Food and Drug Administration/normas , Estudos Clínicos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Projetos de Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/estatística & dados numéricos
3.
J Hand Microsurg ; 13(2): 89-94, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33867767

RESUMO

Introduction Little and ring finger carpometacarpal joints (CMCJs) injuries are commonly missed due to misinterpretation of radiographs. We aimed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of four different radiographic views. Materials and Methods Radiographs (posteroanterior [PA], lateral [LAT], pronated oblique [POL], and supinated oblique [SOL] views) showing normal findings or little/ring finger CMCJ injuries were shown to two cohorts of orthopaedic trainees and a cohort of emergency nurse practitioners. Results The POL view performed best in all three testing scenarios. The SOL view performed least well. The combination of a PA, true LAT, and POL identified 78% of injuries correctly. In no cases did the SOL view correctly identify an injury when the other three views had been interpreted as normal. Conclusion We recommend a combination of the PA, POL, and LAT views in diagnosing these injuries. Where doubt remains, cross-sectional imaging is essential.

4.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol ; 46(6): 632-636, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33327845

RESUMO

We report six cases of complications from use of a thermal wand at wrist arthroscopy. Complications included skin necrosis, extensor tendon lesions and thermal articular cartilage damage, one with a catastrophic outcome. Thermal wands have the potential for substantial soft tissue damage causing severe harm to patients. The damage could be related to the design of the wands. User error poses an additional risk. These risks need to be appreciated and should be minimized. The complications indicate the need for careful use of the thermal wands to minimise risk including using only short bursts of thermal energy, the use of high flow irrigation with an outflow and trying to ensure that the collar of the device and not just the tip is within the joint. In addition, the design of thermal wands for use in the wrist may need to be reviewed.Level of evidence: IV.


Assuntos
Cartilagem Articular , Traumatismos do Punho , Artroscopia , Cartilagem Articular/cirurgia , Humanos , Tendões , Punho , Traumatismos do Punho/cirurgia , Articulação do Punho/cirurgia
5.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(4): e203284, 2020 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32315070

RESUMO

Importance: Since the introduction of the Fast Track designation in 1988, the number of special regulatory programs available for the approval of new drugs and biologics by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has increased, offering the agency flexibility with respect to evidentiary requirements. Objective: To characterize pivotal efficacy trials supporting the approval of new drugs and biologics during the past 3 decades. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included 273 new drugs and biologics approved by the FDA for 339 indications from 1995 to 1997, from 2005 to 2007, and from 2015 to 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Therapeutics were classified by product type and therapeutic area as well as orphan designation and use of special regulatory programs, such as Priority Review and Accelerated Approval. Pivotal trials were characterized by use of randomization, blinding, types of comparators, primary end points, number of treated patients, and trial duration, both individually and aggregated by each indication approval. Results: A total of 273 new drugs and biologics were approved by the FDA in these 3 periods (107 [39.2%] in 1995-1997; 57 [20.9%] in 2005-2007; and 109 [39.9%] in 2015-2017), representing 339 indications (157 [46.3%], 64 [18.9%], and 118 [34.8%], respectively). The proportion of therapeutic approvals using at least 1 special regulatory program increased (37 [34.6%] in 1995-1997; 33 [57.9%] in 2005-2007; and 70 [64.2%] in 2015-2017), as did indication approvals receiving an orphan designation (20 [12.7%] in 1995-1997; 17 [26.6%] in 2005-2007, and 45 [38.1%] in 2015-2017). The most common therapeutic areas differed over time (infectious disease, 53 [33.8%] in 1995-1997 vs cancer, 32 [27.1%] in 2015-2017). When considering the aggregate pivotal trials supporting each indication approval, the proportion of indications supported by at least 2 pivotal trials decreased (80.6% [95% CI, 72.6%-87.2%] in 1995-1997; 60.3% [95% CI, 47.2%-72.4%] in 2005-2007; and 52.8% [95% CI, 42.9%-62.6%] in 2015-2017; P < .001). The proportion of indications supported by only single-group pivotal trials increased (4.0% [95% CI, 1.3%-9.2%] in 1995-1997; 12.7% [95% CI, 5.6%-23.5%] in 2005-2007; and 17.0% [95% CI, 10.4%-25.5%] in 2015-2017; P = .001), whereas the proportion supported by at least 1 pivotal trial of 6 months' duration increased (25.8% [95% CI, 18.4%-34.4%] in 1995-1997; 34.9% [95% CI, 23.3%-48.0%] in 2005-2007; and 46.2% [95% CI, 36.5%-56.2%] in 2015-2017; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, more recent FDA approvals of new drugs and biologics were based on fewer pivotal trials, which, when aggregated by indication, had less rigorous designs but longer trial durations, suggesting an ongoing need for continued evaluation of therapeutic safety and efficacy after approval.


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Aprovação de Drogas/estatística & dados numéricos , Preparações Farmacêuticas , Produtos Biológicos , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
6.
BMJ Open ; 10(3): e033269, 2020 03 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32220910

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: In 2001, Chinese guidelines for the care of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) included a new recommendation against the routine use of magnesium. We studied temporal trends and institutional variation in the use of intravenous magnesium sulfate in nationally representative samples of individuals hospitalised with AMI in China between 2001 and 2015. METHODS: In an observational study (China PEACE-Retrospective Study) of AMI care, we used a two-stage, random sampling strategy to create a nationally representative sample of 28 208 patients with AMI at 162 Chinese hospitals in 2001, 2006, 2011 and 2015. The main outcome is use of intravenous magnesium sulfate over time. RESULTS: We identified 24 418 patients admitted for AMI, without hypokalaemia, in the four study years. Over time, there was a significant initial decrease in intravenous magnesium sulfate use, from 32.1% in 2001 to 17.1% in 2015 (p<0.001 for trend). The decline was greater in the Eastern (from 33.3% to 16.5%) and Western (from 34.8% to 17.2%) regions, as compared with the Central region (from 25.9% to 18.1%), with little difference between rural and urban areas. The proportion of hospitals using intravenous magnesium sulfate did not change over time (from 81.3% to 77.9%). The median ORs, representing hospital-level variation, were 6.03 in 2001, 3.86 in 2006, 4.26 in 2011 and 4.72 in 2015. Intravenous magnesium sulfate use was associated with cardiac arrest at admission and receipt of reperfusion therapy, but no hospital-specific characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Despite recommendations against its use, intravenous magnesium sulfate is used in about one in six patients with AMI in China. Our findings highlight the need for more efficient mechanisms to stop using ineffective therapies to improve patients' outcomes and reduce medical waste. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01624883).


Assuntos
Sulfato de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Infarto do Miocárdio , Administração Intravenosa , Idoso , China , Feminino , Parada Cardíaca , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Retrospectivos
8.
Clin Pharmacol Ther ; 104(5): 1000-1007, 2018 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29377075

RESUMO

We examined whether drug-related characteristics-conditions, development, manufacturers, revenues-were associated with postmarketing research in terms of the number of trials and total population to be enrolled. We included 63 drugs, corresponding to 3,867 postmarketing trials of approved indications. On multivariable analysis, both the number of postmarketing trials and population to be enrolled were associated with expected length of treatment (ratio of means (RoM) = 2.35 and RoM = 8.65) and number of patients in pivotal trials (RoM = 1.11 and RoM = 1.25 per thousand patients). The number of postmarketing trials was increased for drugs approved with surrogate endpoints (RoM = 2.19), generating high revenues (RoM = 1.08 per billion dollars) and addressing greater disease burden (RoM = 1.90 per hundred million disability-adjusted life years). The population to be included was increased for drugs approved after an increased number of pivotal trials (RoM = 1.82) and those unaffected by safety concerns (RoM = 2.63). Postmarketing trials seem to be driven both by medical and market factors.


Assuntos
Aprovação de Drogas/métodos , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados/métodos , Projetos de Pesquisa , United States Food and Drug Administration , Bases de Dados Factuais , Determinação de Ponto Final , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Análise Multivariada , Seleção de Pacientes , Sistema de Registros , Tamanho da Amostra , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
9.
Int J Cancer ; 142(2): 414-423, 2018 01 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28929484

RESUMO

Post-marketing research in oncology has rarely been described. We aimed to characterize post-marketing trials for a consistent set of anticancer agents over a long period. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of post-marketing trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov through September 2014 for novel anticancer agents approved by both the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency between 2005 and 2010. All relevant post-marketing trials were classified according to indication, primary outcome, starting date, sponsors, and planned enrollment. Supplemental indications were retrieved from regulatory documents and publication rate was assessed by two different methods. Ten novel anticancer agents were eligible: five were indicated for hematologic malignancies and the remaining five for solid cancers (three for kidney cancer). We identified 2,345 post-marketing trials; 1,362 (58.1%) targeted an indication other than the originally approved one. We observed extreme variations among drugs in both number of post-marketing trials (range 8-530) and overall population to be enrolled per trial (1-8,381). Post-marketing trials assessed almost all types of cancers, the three most frequently studied cancers being leukemia, kidney cancer and myeloma. In all, 6.6% of post-marketing trials had a clinical endpoint as a primary outcome, and 35.9% and 54.1% had a safety or surrogate endpoint, respectively, as a primary outcome. Nine drugs obtained approval for supplemental indications. The publication rate at 10 years was 12.3 to 26.1% depending on the analysis method. In conclusion, we found that post-marketing research in oncology is highly heterogeneous and the publication rate of launched trials is low.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Aprovação de Drogas/legislação & jurisprudência , Órgãos Governamentais/legislação & jurisprudência , Marketing , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estudos Transversais , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos , União Europeia , Humanos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 1(5): e182044, 2018 09 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30646146

RESUMO

Importance: Although studies have described differences in hospital outcomes by patient race and socioeconomic status, it is not clear whether such disparities are driven by hospitals themselves or by broader systemic effects. Objective: To determine patterns of racial and socioeconomic disparities in outcomes within and between hospitals for patients with acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cohort study initiated before February 2013, with additional analyses conducted during the peer-review process. Hospitals in the United States treating at least 25 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older in each race (ie, black and white) and neighborhood income level (ie, higher income and lower income) for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia between 2009 and 2011 were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: For within-hospital analyses, risk-standardized mortality rates and risk-standardized readmission rates for race and neighborhood income subgroups were calculated at each hospital. The corresponding ratios using intraclass correlation coefficients were then compared. For between-hospital analyses, risk-standardized rates were assessed according to hospitals' proportion of patients in each subgroup. These analyses were performed for each of the 12 analysis cohorts reflecting the unique combinations of outcomes (mortality and readmission), demographics (race and neighborhood income), and conditions (acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia). Results: Between 74% (3545 of 4810) and 91% (4136 of 4554) of US hospitals lacked sufficient racial and socioeconomic diversity to be included in this analysis, with the number of hospitals eligible for analysis varying among cohorts. The 12 analysis cohorts ranged in size from 418 to 1265 hospitals and from 144 417 to 703 324 patients. Within included hospitals, risk-standardized mortality rates tended to be lower among black patients (mean [SD] difference between risk-standardized mortality rates in black patients compared with white patients for acute myocardial infarction, -0.57 [1.1] [P = .47]; for heart failure, -4.7 [1.3] [P < .001]; and for pneumonia, -1.0 [2.0] [P = .05]). However, risk-standardized readmission rates among black patients were higher (mean [SD] difference between risk-standardized readmission rates in black patients compared with white patients for acute myocardial infarction, 4.3 [1.4] [P < .001]; for heart failure, 2.8 [1.8] [P < .001], and for pneumonia, 3.7 [1.3] [P < .001]). Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.68 to 0.79, indicating that hospitals generally delivered consistent quality to patients of differing races. While the coefficients in the neighborhood income analysis were slightly lower (0.46-0.60), indicating some heterogeneity in within-hospital performance, differences in mortality rates and readmission rates between the 2 neighborhood income groups were small. There were no strong, consistent associations between risk-standardized outcomes for white or higher-income neighborhood patients and hospitals' proportion of black or lower-income neighborhood patients. Conclusions and Relevance: Hospital performance according to race and socioeconomic status was generally consistent within and between hospitals, even as there were overall differences in outcomes by race and neighborhood income. This finding indicates that disparities are likely to be systemic, rather than localized to particular hospitals.


Assuntos
Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Classe Social , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , População Negra/etnologia , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etnologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/etnologia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Pneumonia/epidemiologia , Pneumonia/etnologia , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos , População Branca/etnologia , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos
11.
Expert Opin Drug Saf ; 17(2): 117-123, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29215916

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The boxed warning (also known as 'black box warning [BBW]') is one of the strongest drug safety actions that the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) can implement, and often warns of serious risks. The objective of this study was to comprehensively characterize BBWs issued for drugs after FDA approval. METHODS: We identified all post-marketing BBWs from January 2008 through June 2015 listed on FDA's MedWatch and Drug Safety Communications websites. We used each drug's prescribing information to classify its BBW as new, major update to a preexisting BBW, or minor update. We then characterized these BBWs with respect to pre-specified BBW-specific and drug-specific features. RESULTS: There were 111 BBWs issued to drugs on the US market, of which 29% (n = 32) were new BBWs, 32% (n = 35) were major updates, and 40% (n = 44) were minor updates. New BBWs and major updates were most commonly issued for death (51%) and cardiovascular risk (27%). The new BBWs and major updates impacted 200 drug formulations over the study period, of which 64% were expected to be used chronically and 58% had available alternatives without a BBW. CONCLUSIONS: New BBWs and incremental updates to existing BBWs are frequently added to drug labels after regulatory approval.


Assuntos
Rotulagem de Medicamentos/legislação & jurisprudência , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
12.
BMJ Open ; 7(12): e018587, 2017 12 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29273664

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To characterise postmarketing studies for drugs that were newly approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency. DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional analysis of postmarketing studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov until September 2014 for all novel drugs approved by both regulators between 2005 and 2010. Regulatory documents from both agencies were used. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: All identified postmarketing studies were classified according to planned enrolment, funding, status and geographical location, and we determined whether studies studied the originally approved indication. RESULTS: Overall, 69 novel drugs approved between 2005 and 2010 were eligible for inclusion. A total of 6679 relevant postmarketing studies were identified; 5972 were interventional (89.4%). The median number of studies per drug was 55 (IQR 33-119) and median number of patients to be enrolled per study was 60 (IQR 28-183). Industry was the primary sponsor of 2713 studies (40.6%) and was a primary or secondary sponsor in 4176 studies (62.5%). In all, 2901 studies (43.4%) were completed, 487 (7.3%) terminated, 1013 (15.2%) active yet not recruiting, 1895 (28.4%) recruiting and 319 (4.8%) not yet recruiting. A total of 80% of studies were conducted in only one country and 84.4% took place in Europe and/or North America; 2441 (36.5%) studied another indication than the originally approved indication. Studies designed in the originally approved indication were found to be more industry-sponsored than others 68.7%vs53.7%; P<0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: Postmarketing pharmaceutical research was highly variable and predominantly located in North America and Europe. Postmarketing studies were frequently designed to study indications other than the originally approved one. Although some findings were reassuring, others question the lack of coordination of postmarketing research.


Assuntos
Aprovação de Drogas/estatística & dados numéricos , Indústria Farmacêutica , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Transversais , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Vigilância de Produtos Comercializados/tendências , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29158421

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In response to urban-rural disparities in healthcare resources, China recently launched a healthcare reform with a focus on improving rural care during the past decade. However, nationally representative studies comparing medical care and patient outcomes between urban and rural areas in China during this period are not available. METHODS AND RESULTS: We created a nationally representative sample of patients in China admitted for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction in 2001, 2006, and 2011, using a 2-stage random sampling design in 2 urban and 3 rural strata. In China, evidence-based treatments were provided less often in 2001 in rural hospitals, which had lower volume and less availability of advanced cardiac facilities. However, these differences diminished by 2011 for reperfusion therapy (54% in urban versus 57% in rural; P=0.1) and reversed for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (66% versus 68%; P=0.04) and early ß-blockers (56% versus 60%; P=0.01). The risk-adjusted rate of in-hospital death or withdrawal from treatment was not significantly different between urban and rural hospitals in any study year, with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.13 (0.77-1.65) in 2001, 0.99 (0.77-1.27) in 2006, and 0.94 (0.74-1.19) in 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Although urban-rural disparities in evidence-based treatment for myocardial infarction in China have largely been eliminated, substantial gaps in quality of care persist in both settings. In addition, urban hospitals providing more resource-intensive care did not achieve better outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01624883.


Assuntos
Gerenciamento Clínico , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Hospitalização/tendências , Hospitais Rurais/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais Urbanos/estatística & dados numéricos , Melhoria de Qualidade , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos , População Rural/estatística & dados numéricos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/mortalidade , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Fatores de Tempo , População Urbana/estatística & dados numéricos
16.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes ; 3(4): 319-327, 2017 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28950309

RESUMO

Aims: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI) in China and other low- and middle-income countries outnumber non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (NSTEMI). We hypothesized that the STEMI predominance was associated with lower biomarker use and would vary with hospital characteristics. Methods and results: We hypothesized that the STEMI predominance was associated with lower biomarker use and would vary with hospital characteristics. Using data from the nationally representative China PEACE-Retrospective AMI Study during 2001, 2006, and 2011, we compared hospital NSTEMI proportion across categories of use of any cardiac biomarker (CK, CK-MB, or troponin) and troponin, as well as across region, location, level, and teaching status. Among 15 416 acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, 14% had NSTEMI. NSTEMI patients were older, more likely female, and to have comorbidities. Median hospital NSTEMI proportion in each study year was similar across categories of any cardiac biomarker use, troponin, region, location, level, and teaching status. For instance, in 2011 the NSTEMI proportion at hospitals without troponin testing was 11.2% [inter quartile range (IQR) 4.4-16.7%], similar to those with ≥ 75% troponin use (13.0% [IQR 8.7-23.7%]) (P-value for difference 0.77). Analysed as continuous variables there was no relationship between hospital NSTEMI proportion and proportion biomarker use. With troponin use there was no relationship in 2001 and 2006, but a modest correlation in 2011 (R = 0.16, P = 0.043). Admissions for NSTEMI increased from 0.3/100 000 people in 2001 to 3.3/100 000 people in 2011 (P-value for trend < 0.001). Conclusion: STEMI is the dominant presentation of AMI in China, but the proportion of NSTEMI is increasing. Biomarker use and hospital characteristics did not account for the low NSTEMI rate. Clinical trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01624883).


Assuntos
Creatina Quinase Forma MB/sangue , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/epidemiologia , Troponina/sangue , Idoso , Proteínas de Arabidopsis , Biomarcadores/sangue , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade/tendências , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/sangue , Proteínas Nucleares , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências
19.
PLoS One ; 12(6): e0179603, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28662045

RESUMO

Public reporting of measures of hospital performance is an important component of quality improvement efforts in many countries. However, it can be challenging to provide an overall characterization of hospital performance because there are many measures of quality. In the United States, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reports over 100 measures that describe various domains of hospital quality, such as outcomes, the patient experience and whether established processes of care are followed. Although individual quality measures provide important insight, it is challenging to understand hospital performance as characterized by multiple quality measures. Accordingly, we developed a novel approach for characterizing hospital performance that highlights the similarities and differences between hospitals and identifies common patterns of hospital performance. Specifically, we built a semi-supervised machine learning algorithm and applied it to the publicly-available quality measures for 1,614 U.S. hospitals to graphically and quantitatively characterize hospital performance. In the resulting visualization, the varying density of hospitals demonstrates that there are key clusters of hospitals that share specific performance profiles, while there are other performance profiles that are rare. Several popular hospital rating systems aggregate some of the quality measures included in our study to produce a composite score; however, hospitals that were top-ranked by such systems were scattered across our visualization, indicating that these top-ranked hospitals actually excel in many different ways. Our application of a novel graph analytics method to data describing U.S. hospitals revealed nuanced differences in performance that are obscured in existing hospital rating systems.


Assuntos
Administração Hospitalar , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Estados Unidos
20.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 6(6)2017 Jun 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28645937

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: China has gaps in the quality of care provided to patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, but little is known about how quality varies between hospitals. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using nationally representative data from the China PEACE-Retrospective AMI Study, we characterized the quality of care for ST-elevation myocardial infarction at the hospital level and examined variation between hospitals. Two summary measures were used to describe the overall quality of care at each hospital and to characterize variations in quality between hospitals in 2001, 2006, and 2011. The composite rate measured the proportion of opportunities a hospital had to deliver 6 guideline-recommended treatments for ST-elevation myocardial infarction that were successfully met, while the defect-free rate measured the proportion of patients at each hospital receiving all guideline-recommended treatments for which they were eligible. Risk-standardized mortality rates were calculated. Our analysis included 12 108 patients treated for ST-elevation myocardial infarction at 162 hospitals. The median composite rate increased from 56.8% (interquartile range [IQR], 45.9-72.0) in 2001 to 80.5% (IQR, 74.7-84.8) in 2011; however, substantial variation remained in 2011 with defect-free rates ranging from 0.0% to 76.9%. The median risk-standardized mortality rate increased from 9.9% (IQR, 9.1-11.7) in 2001 to 12.6% (IQR, 10.9-14.6) in 2006 before falling to 10.4% (IQR, 9.1-12.4) in 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Higher rates of guideline-recommended care and a decline in variation between hospitals are indicative of an improvement in quality. Although some variation persisted in 2011, very top-performing hospitals missed few opportunities to provide guideline-recommended care. Quality improvement initiatives should focus on eliminating residual variation as well as measuring and improving outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01624883.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Hospitais/normas , Avaliação de Processos em Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde/normas , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , China , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/normas , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto/normas , Padrões de Prática Médica/normas , Melhoria de Qualidade/normas , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...