Quantification of observable behaviors following oral administration of oxycodone and nalfurafine in male rhesus monkeys.

BACKGROUND: Recent preclinical studies have investigated the atypical kappa-opioid receptor (KOR) agonist, nalfurafine, as a co-formulary with mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists as a potential deterrent for misuse. However, no study has investigated effects of nalfurafine combined with a MOR agonist using an oral route of administration. The objective of the current study was to measure behavioral effects of orally administered oxycodone and nalfurafine, alone and combined, in rhesus monkeys using a quantitative behavioral observation procedure. METHODS: Adult male rhesus monkeys (N=5) were orally administered vehicle, oxycodone (0.56-1.8mg/kg), nalfurafine (0.001-0.0056mg/kg), or mixtures (1.0mg/kg oxycodone/0.001-0.0056mg/kg nalfurafine) in a Jell-O vehicle at multiple timepoints (10-320min). Species-typical and drug-induced behaviors were recorded by observers blinded to conditions. RESULTS: Oxycodone alone significantly increased scratch and face-rub behaviors without affecting other behaviors. Nalfurafine decreased baseline levels of scratch without affecting other behaviors, and oxycodone-nalfurafine combinations resulted in reduced oxycodone-induced scratching at a dose (0.001mg/kg) that did not produce sedation-like effects. Oxycodone combined with larger nalfurafine doses (0.0032-0.0056mg/kg) also reduced oxycodone induced scratch that were accompanied with sedation-like effects (i.e., increased lip droop). CONCLUSIONS: Nalfurafine was orally active in rhesus monkeys, and it reduced oxycodone-induced pruritus at a dose that did not produce sedation-like effects that are commonly observed with prototypical KOR agonists. Combinations of low doses of nalfurafine with MOR agonists such as oxycodone may be well-tolerated by humans who are prescribed MOR agonists for the treatment of pain.

Choice between food and cocaine reinforcers under fixed and variable schedules in female and male rhesus monkeys.

Illicit drugs like cocaine may be uncertain in terms of the time and effort required to obtain them. Behavior maintained by variable schedules resembles excessive drug-taking compared with fixed schedules. However, no prior research has examined fixed versus variable schedules in drug versus nondrug choice. The present study evaluated cocaine versus food choice under fixed- (FR) and variable-ratio (VR) schedules. The simpler food versus food and cocaine versus cocaine arrangements also were included. Adult female (n = 6) and male (n = 7) rhesus monkeys chose between cocaine (0.01-0.18 mg/kg/injection) and food (4 pellets/delivery), food and food (4 pellets/delivery), or cocaine and cocaine (0.018-0.03 mg/kg/injection) under FR and VR 100 and 200 schedules. In cocaine versus food choice, cocaine's potency to maintain choice was greatest when available under a VR 100 or 200 schedule and food under an FR schedule and was lowest when cocaine was available under an FR 200 schedule and food was available under a VR 200 schedule. In food versus food choice, males chose food associated with a VR schedule more than food associated with an FR schedule. In cocaine versus cocaine choice, females and males chose cocaine associated with a VR schedule more than cocaine associated with an FR schedule, particularly under VR 200. These findings suggest that uncertainty in terms of time and effort required to obtain cocaine, or perhaps the occasional low-cost access that results from VR schedules, results in greater allocation of behavior toward drug reinforcers at the expense of more certain, nondrug alternatives. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Environmental Uncertainty and Substance Use Disorders: A Behavior Analytic Perspective.

Substance use disorder (SUD) and drug overdose deaths represent major economic, health, and safety issues in the United States. The psychology of uncertainty provides a mechanism for understanding, reducing, and controlling the damage from substance misuse. Illicit drugs (such as heroin or cocaine) are uncertain in their availability, quality, and acquisition (the time and effort required to obtain them) compared with nondrug-related alternatives (such as consumable goods, hobbies, or paychecks). Furthermore, the severity and likelihood of negative outcomes associated with drug use likewise are uncertain. Such uncertainties worsen substance use outcomes. The current review conveys what is known about the impact of uncertainty on substance use: laboratory investigations of uncertain time and effort required to obtain a substance and uncertain drug quality show uncertainty exacerbates harm. Furthermore, uncertain negative outcomes are not likely to deter substance use in individuals with a SUD. Finally, several policy implications include access to agonist medications; creating a safer drug supply; access to clean syringes/needles, naloxone, and safe-injection sites; and ending incarceration for substance use.