A phase II, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of CO-1.01 as second-line therapy for gemcitabine-refractory patients with stage IV pancreatic adenocarcinoma and negative tumor hENT1 expression.

BACKGROUND: Nucleotide transporters such as human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1) play a major role in transporting gemcitabine into cells. CO-1.01 (gemcitabine-5'-elaidate) is a novel cytotoxic agent consisting of a fatty acid derivative of gemcitabine, which is transported intracellularly independent of hENT1. CO-1.01 was postulated to have efficacy as a second-line treatment in gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma in patients with negative tumor hENT1 expression. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included patients with either a newly procured or archival biopsy tumor confirming the absence of hENT1 and either gemcitabine-refractory metastatic pancreas adenocarcinoma or with progression of disease following resection during or within 3 months of adjuvant gemcitabine therapy. Patients were treated with intravenous infusion of CO-1.01 dosed at 1250 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of a 4-week cycle. The primary end point was disease control rate (DCR). RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled of which 18 patients were evaluable for efficacy assessment. Thirteen patients (68%) had liver metastases, 6 (32%) had lymph node metastases, and 10 (53%) had lung metastases. Two of 18 patients (11%) achieved disease control. The median survival time was 4.3 (95% CI 2.1-8.1) months. All patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event with the majority of events being mild or moderate. CONCLUSION: This study did not meet its primary endpoint and no efficacy signal was identified for CO-1.01 in treating progressive metastatic pancreas adenocarcinoma.

Phase II trial of vatalanib in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma after first-line gemcitabine therapy (PCRT O4-001).

PURPOSE: Vatalanib (PTK 787/ZK22584) is an oral poly-tyrosine kinase inhibitor with strong affinity for platelet-derived growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors. We conducted an open-label, phase II multicenter therapeutic trial investigating the efficacy and tolerability of vatalanib in patients with metastatic or advanced pancreatic cancer who failed first-line gemcitabine-based therapy. METHODS: Vatalanib treatment consisted of a twice daily oral dosing using a "ramp-up schedule," beginning with 250 mg bid during week 1,500 mg bid during week 2, and 750 mg bid on week three and thereafter. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the 6-month survival rate. RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were enrolled. The median age was 64, and 66% (N = 43) had only one prior regimen. Common grade 3/4 adverse events included hypertension (20%; N = 13), fatigue (17%; N = 11), abdominal pain (17%; N = 11), and elevated alkaline phosphatase (15%; N = 10). Among the 65 evaluable patients, the 6-month survival rate was 29% (95% CI 18-41%) and the median progression-free survival was 2 months. Fifteen patients survived 6 months or more. Two patients had objective partial responses, and 28% of patients had stable disease. Changes in biomarkers including soluble VEGF and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor did not correlate with response to drug. CONCLUSION: Vatalanib was well tolerated as a second-line therapy and resulted in favorable 6-month survival rate in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, compared with historic controls.

Open-label, dose-escalation, safety, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic study of intravenously administered CNF1010 (17-(allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin [17-AAG]) in patients with solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: 17-(Allylamino)-17-demethoxygeldanamycin (17-AAG) is a benzoquinone ansamycin that binds to and inhibits the Hsp90 family of molecular chaperones leading to the proteasomal degradation of client proteins critical in malignant cell proliferation and survival. We have undertaken a Phase 1 trial of CNF1010, an oil-in-water nanoemulsion of 17-AAG. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors and adequate organ functions received CNF1010 by 1-h intravenous (IV) infusion, twice a week, 3 out of 4 weeks. Doses were escalated sequentially in single-patient (6 and 12 mg/m(2)/day) and three-to-six-patient (≥25 mg/m(2)/day) cohorts according to a modified Fibonacci's schema. Plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and biomarkers, including Hsp70 in PBMCs, HER-2 extracellular domain, and IGFBP2 in plasma, were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were treated at doses ranging from 6 to 225 mg/m(2). A total of 10 DLTs in nine patients (2 events of fatigue, 83 and 175 mg/m(2); shock, abdominal pain, ALT increased, increased transaminases, and pain in extremity at 175 mg/m(2); extremity pain, atrial fibrillation, and metabolic encephalopathy at 225 mg/m(2)) were noted. The PK profile of 17-AAG after the first dose appeared to be linear up to 175 mg/m(2), with a dose-proportional increase in C max and AUC0-inf. Hsp70 induction in PBMCs and inhibition of serum HER-2 neu extracellular domain indicated biological effects of CNF1010 at doses >83 mg/m(2). CONCLUSION: The maximum tolerated dose was not formally established. Hsp70 induction in PBMCs and inhibition of serum HER-2 neu extracellular domain indicated biological effects. The CNF1010 clinical program is no longer being pursued due to the toxicity profile of the drug and the development of second-generation Hsp90 molecules.

A phase IB trial of 24-hour intravenous PX-12, a thioredoxin-1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancers.

We investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of PX-12, a thioredoxin-1 (Trx-1) inhibitor, administered as a 24-hour infusion every 7 or 14 days in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. PX-12 is the first Trx-1 inhibitor to undergo clinical development. The first Phase 1 study of PX-12 demonstrated promising clinical activity, but the 1 and 3 hour-infusion schedules investigated were associated with a strong and irritating odor due to exhalation of one of its metabolites, 2-butanethiol. In an effort to achieve tolerability and achieve a drug exposure level necessary for biological activity, the current study was undertaken. While the maximally tolerated dose was estimated to be 300 mg/m(2) /24 h once a week as the 2-butanethiol expirate was tolerable at that dose level, no evidence of clinical activity was observed. Pharmacokinetic studies of the parent compound PX-12 demonstrated rapid, irreversible binding to plasma components, resulting in low (ng/ml) peak plasma concentrations of non-bound PX-12 during infusion. DCE-MRI was performed pre-and post-infusion in three patients. There were no significant trends observed in changes in plasma Trx-1, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), or beta fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) pre- or post-treatment. However, there was a trend for a decrease in circulating Trx-1 during the first four PX-12 treatment cycles in patients that had a Trx-1 baseline level >18 ng/mL. Aggregate clinical trial results suggest that further clinical development of PX-12, as an intravenous infusion, is not feasible. However, the Trx-1 pathway remains a target of interest in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

A phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of AT7519, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor in patients with refractory solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: AT7519 is an inhibitor of multiple cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). Based on potent antitumor activity in preclinical models, a first-in-human clinical trial in refractory solid tumors investigated its safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: AT7519 was administered in a '3 + 3' dose- escalation scheme on 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks to patients with advanced, refractory solid tumors. Samples to monitor AT7519 PK and PD were obtained. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were treated at seven dose levels (1.8-40 mg/m(2)/day). At 40 mg/m(2)/day, one patient developed hypotension and ST segment elevation. At 34 mg/m(2)/day, dose-limiting toxic effects (DLTs) were QTc prolongation with one death (grade 5), fatigue (grade 4) and mucositis (grade 3). Electrocardiogram review suggested a dose-dependent increase in QTc and recruitment was discontinued without establishing a maximum tolerated dose. Four patients exhibited stable disease for >6 months and one had a prolonged partial response. PK profile revealed modest interpatient variation with linear exposure at increasing doses. Inhibition of markers of CDK activity was observed across the dose range and manifested in antiproliferative activity at a dose of 28 mg/m(2). CONCLUSION: AT7519 elicited clinical and PD activity resulting from CDK inhibition at doses below the appearance of DLT of QTc prolongation.

Discrepancy in the assessment of tumor response in patients with pancreatic cancer: WHO versus RECIST criteria.

PURPOSE: The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) have largely replaced the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria as a preferred method for assessing tumor response in clinical trials. We hypothesized that due to frequent asymmetric growth pattern, as well as somewhat diffuse margins of pancreatic cancer, the use of WHO vs. RECIST criteria may result in significantly different tumor response assessments. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the WHO (bidimensional) to RECIST (unidimensional) in assessing treatment response in pancreatic cancer patients enrolled in clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We have evaluated the contrast- enhanced computed tomography (CT) images from 12 pancreatic cancer patients with measurable disease enrolled in two phase I/II clinical trials at the Arizona Cancer Center, between July 2000 and July 2003. The tumor measurements were re-calculated by RECIST and WHO criteria and were compared. RESULTS: In 3 out of the 12 patients (25%) there was discordant response categorization when WHO criteria were used instead of RECIST. Clinical presentations in all 3 patients were more consistent with WHO categorization. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective data analysis suggests that use of different tumor response criteria (RECIST vs. WHO) may result in different assessments of treatment efficacy in patients with pancreatic cancer on clinical trials. This finding warrants further confirmation in a larger prospectively designed trial.

Signal transduction pathways that regulate cell survival and cell death.

Apoptosis or programmed cell death (PCD) is a physiological process critical for organ development, tissue homeostasis and elimination of defective or potentially dangerous cells in complex organisms. Apoptosis permits cell death without a concomitant inflammatory response in the surrounding tissues. The process of apoptosis depends on the reception of multiple extracellular and intracellular signals, integration and amplification of these signals by second messengers and finally, activation of the death effector proteases. Defects in control of apoptotic pathways may contribute to a variety of diseases including cancer, autoimmune and neurodegenerative conditions and AIDS. While many components of the regulatory network controlling apoptosis have been defined, the mechanisms of action and patterns of interaction of these factors remain controversial. This article summarizes some of the known aspects of signaling pathways involved in apoptosis.