The PPP2R1A cancer hotspot mutant p.R183W increases clofarabine resistance in uterine serous carcinoma cells by a gain-of-function mechanism.

PURPOSE: Uterine serous carcinoma (USC) is generally associated with poor prognosis due to a high recurrence rate and frequent treatment resistance; hence, there is a need for improved therapeutic strategies. Molecular analysis of USC identified several molecular markers, useful to improve current treatments or identify new druggable targets. PPP2R1A, encoding the Aα subunit of the tumor suppressive Ser/Thr phosphatase PP2A, is mutated in up to 40% of USCs. Here, we investigated the effect of the p.R183W PPP2R1A hotspot variant on treatment response to the nucleoside analogue clofarabine. METHODS AND RESULTS: USC cells stably expressing p.R183W Aα showed increased resistance to clofarabine treatment in vitro and, corroborated by decreased clofarabine-induced apoptosis, G1 phase arrest, DNA-damage (γH2AX) and activation of ATM and Chk1/2 kinases. Phenotypic rescue by pharmacologic PP2A inhibition or dicer-substrate siRNA (dsiRNA)-mediated B56δ subunit knockdown supported a gain-of-function mechanism of Aα p.R183W, promoting dephosphorylation and inactivation of deoxycytidine kinase (dCK), the cellular enzyme responsible for the conversion of clofarabine into its bioactive form. Therapeutic assessment of related nucleoside analogues (gemcitabine, cladribine) revealed similar effects, but in a cell line-dependent manner. Expression of two other PPP2R1A USC mutants (p.P179R or p.S256F) did not affect clofarabine response in our cell models, arguing for mutant-specific effects on treatment outcome as well. CONCLUSIONS: While our results call for PPP2R1A mutant and context-dependent effects upon clofarabine/nucleoside analogue monotherapy, combining clofarabine with a pharmacologic PP2A inhibitor proved synergistically in all tested conditions, highlighting a new generally applicable strategy to improve treatment outcome in USC.

Dosing of IV posaconazole to treat critically ill patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis: a population pharmacokinetics modelling and simulation study.

BACKGROUND: Posaconazole is used for the prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal infections in critically ill patients. Standard dosing was shown to result in adequate attainment of the prophylaxis Cmin target (0.7 mg/L) but not of the treatment Cmin target (1.0 mg/L). OBJECTIVES: To provide an optimized posaconazole dosing regimen for IV treatment of patients with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in the ICU. METHODS: A population pharmacokinetics (popPK) model was developed using data from the POSA-FLU PK substudy (NCT03378479). Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess treatment Cmin and AUC0-24 PTA. PTA ≥90% was deemed clinically acceptable. PopPK modelling and simulation were performed using NONMEM 7.5. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients with intensive PK sampling were included in the PK substudy, contributing 532 posaconazole plasma concentrations. The popPK of IV posaconazole was best described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination. Interindividual variability was estimated on clearance and volume of distribution in central and peripheral compartments. Posaconazole peripheral volume of distribution increased with bodyweight. An optimized loading regimen of 300 mg q12h and 300 mg q8h in the first two treatment days achieved acceptable PTA by Day 3 in patients <100 kg and ≥100 kg, respectively. A maintenance regimen of 400 mg q24h ensured ≥90% Cmin PTA, whereas the standard 300 mg q24h was sufficient to achieve the AUC0-24 target throughout 14 days, irrespective of bodyweight. CONCLUSIONS: We have defined a convenient, optimized IV posaconazole dosing regimen that was predicted to attain the treatment target in critically ill patients with invasive aspergillosis.

Forecasted infliximab concentrations during induction predict time to remission and sustained disease control of inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab (IFX) exposure is established as a predictive factor of pharmacokinetic (PK) origin in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and expert consensus is to achieve adequate exposure during induction to achieve and sustain remission. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the performance of a Bayesian PK tool in IBD patients starting IFX. Trough IFX serum levels collected immediately before the third (at week 6) and fourth (at week 14) infusions were evaluated from 307 IBD patients (median age=17 years, 50 % females, 83 % with Crohn's disease). Forecasted IFX concentration at the fourth infusion were estimated using serum IFX, antibodies to IFX, albumin and weight determined immediately before the third infusion using population PK calculator with Bayesian prior. The outcome variable was a clinical & biochemical remission status achieved (CRP levels below 3 mg/L in presence of clinical remission). Statistics consisted of Kaplan Meier analysis with calculation of Hazard ratio (HR), and logistic regression. RESULTS: IFX concentration above 15 µg/mL immediately before the third infusion associated with shorter time to clinical & biochemical remission than concentration below 15 µg/mL without reaching significance (163±14 days vs 200±16 days, respectively; p=0.052). However, using PK parameters at the third infusion, forecasted IFX concentrations above 10 µg/mL immediately before the fourth infusion were significantly associated with a higher rate (HR=1.6 95 %CI: 1.1 to 2.1 p<0.01) and shorter time to remission (148±18 days vs 200±13 days p<0.01). In the presence of IFX concentration above 15 µg/mL at the third infusion, there was a significant 2.5-fold higher likelihood of sustained clinical & biochemical remission status during maintenance as compared to IFX concentrations below 15 µg/mL (p<0.01). Forecasted IFX level above 10 µg/mL at fourth infusion associated with significantly 3.9-fold higher likelihood of clinical & biochemical remission as compared to forecasted IFX concentrations below 10 µg/mL (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data further support that optimized IFX concentrations during induction are associated with enhanced disease control in IBD.

Best Practice for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Infliximab: Position Statement from the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology.

BACKGROUND: Infliximab, an anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody, has revolutionized the pharmacological management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). This position statement critically reviews and examines existing data on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of infliximab in patients with IMIDs. It provides a practical guide on implementing TDM in current clinical practices and outlines priority areas for future research. METHODS: The endorsing TDM of Biologics and Pharmacometrics Committees of the International Association of TDM and Clinical Toxicology collaborated to create this position statement. RESULTS: Accumulating data support the evidence for TDM of infliximab in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases, with limited investigation in other IMIDs. A universal approach to TDM may not fully realize the benefits of improving therapeutic outcomes. Patients at risk for increased infliximab clearance, particularly with a proactive strategy, stand to gain the most from TDM. Personalized exposure targets based on therapeutic goals, patient phenotype, and infliximab administration route are recommended. Rapid assays and home sampling strategies offer flexibility for point-of-care TDM. Ongoing studies on model-informed precision dosing in inflammatory bowel disease will help assess the additional value of precision dosing software tools. Patient education and empowerment, and electronic health record-integrated TDM solutions will facilitate routine TDM implementation. Although optimization of therapeutic effectiveness is a primary focus, the cost-reducing potential of TDM also merits consideration. CONCLUSIONS: Successful implementation of TDM for infliximab necessitates interdisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, hospital pharmacists, and (quantitative) clinical pharmacologists to ensure an efficient research trajectory.

Personalized Antifungal Therapy Through Model-Informed Precision Dosing of Posaconazole.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Posaconazole is a pharmacotherapeutic pillar for prophylaxis and treatment of invasive fungal diseases. Dose individualization is of utmost importance as achieving adequate antifungal exposure is associated with improved outcome. This study aimed to select and evaluate a model-informed precision dosing strategy for posaconazole. METHODS: Available population pharmacokinetic models for posaconazole administered as a solid oral tablet were extracted from the literature and evaluated using data from a previously published prospective study combined with data collected during routine clinical practice. External evaluation and selection of the most accurate and precise model was based on graphical goodness-of-fit and predictive performance. Measures for bias and imprecision included mean percentage error (MPE) and normalized relative root mean squared error (NRMSE), respectively. Subsequently, the best-performing model was evaluated for its a posteriori fit-for-purpose and its suitability in a limited sampling strategy. RESULTS: Seven posaconazole models were evaluated using 764 posaconazole plasma concentrations from 143 patients. Multiple models showed adequate predictive performance illustrated by acceptable goodness-of-fit and MPE and NRMSE below ± 10% and ± 25%, respectively. In the fit-for-purpose analysis, the selected model showed adequate a posteriori predictive performance. Bias and imprecision were lowest in the presence of two prior measurements. Additionally, this model showed to be useful in a limited sampling strategy as it adequately predicted total posaconazole exposure from one (non-)trough concentration. CONCLUSION: We validated an MIPD strategy for posaconazole for its fit-for-purpose. Thereby, this study is an important first step towards MIPD-supported posaconazole dosage optimization with the goal to improve antifungal treatment in clinical practice.

Do we perceive sensations inside and outside of our body differently? Perceptual, emotional, and behavioral differences between visceral and somatic sensation, discomfort, and pain.

BACKGROUND: Experimental research evaluating differences between the visceral and somatic stimulation is limited to pain and typically uses different induction methods for visceral and somatic stimulation (e.g., rectal balloon distention vs. tactile hand stimulation). Our study aimed to compare differences in response time, intensity, unpleasantness, and threat between identical electrical visceral and somatic stimulations at both painful and non-painful perceptual thresholds. METHODS: Electrical stimulation was applied to the wrist and distal esophagus in 20 healthy participants. A double pseudorandom staircase determined perceptual thresholds of Sensation, Discomfort, and Pain for the somatic and visceral stimulations, separately. Stimulus reaction time (ms, via button press), and intensity, unpleasantness, and threat ratings were recorded after each stimulus. General linear mixed models compared differences in the four outcomes by stimulation type, threshold, and the stimulation type-by-threshold interaction. Sigmoidal maximum effect models evaluated differences in outcomes across all delivered stimulation intensities. KEY RESULTS: Overall, visceral stimulations were perceived as more intense, threatening, and unpleasant compared to somatic stimulations, but participants responded faster to somatic stimulations. There was no significant interaction effect, but planned contrasts demonstrated differences at individual thresholds. Across all delivered intensities, higher intensity stimulations were needed to reach the half-maximum effect of self-reported intensity, unpleasantness, and threat ratings in the visceral domain. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Differences exist between modalities for both non-painful and painful sensations. These findings may have implications for translating paradigms and behavioral treatments from the somatic domain to the visceral domain, though future research in larger clinical samples is needed.

Agreement Between a Colorimetric Assay and Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Quantifying Paracetamol Plasma Concentrations.

Special populations, like geriatric patients, experience altered paracetamol pharmacokinetics (PK), complicating pain management. More PK research is essential to optimize paracetamol (acetaminophen) dosing. Yet, the reference method ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) is not readily available. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the agreement between UPLC-MS/MS and the more accessible colorimetric Roche acetaminophen (ACETA) assay in quantifying paracetamol plasma concentrations, to facilitate PK studies and therapeutic drug monitoring for pain management. Patient data and plasma samples were obtained from a prospective study including geriatric patients admitted to the geriatric wards. ACETA and UPLC-MS/MS assays were performed in two separate laboratories. Bland-Altman plot and Passing-Bablok regression were used to assess agreement. Accuracy was evaluated using the McNemar test for a threshold value of 10 mg/L. Population PK modeling was employed to bridge PK data obtained from both methods (NONMEM 7.5). A total of 242 plasma sample pairs were available from 40 geriatric patients (age range, 80-95 years). Paracetamol plasma concentrations from ACETA (median 9.8 [interquartile range 6.1-14.4] mg/L) and UPLC-MS/MS (9.5 [6.2-14.8] mg/L) did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). No significant proportional nor additive bias was observed between both assay methods. The classification accuracy (at threshold 10 mg/L) was 85% (P = 0.414). The conversion factor between ACETA and UPLC-MS/MS was estimated at 1.06 (relative standard error 5%), yet with a 13.4% (relative standard error 23%) interindividual variability. ACETA assay showed no systematic bias in comparison with the UPLC-MS/MS assay in determining paracetamol exposure in geriatric blood samples despite the imprecision.

Identifying risk factors of anti-TNF induced skin lesions and other adverse events in paediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

OBJECTIVES: While higher infliximab (IFX) trough concentrations (TCs) are associated with better outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), they could pose a risk for adverse events (AEs), including IFX-induced skin lesions. Therefore, we studied correlations between IFX TCs and occurrence of AEs in paediatric IBD patients. METHODS: In this single-centre study, all children with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) receiving IFX maintenance therapy who underwent proactive drug monitoring between March 2015 and August 2022 were included. IFX doses/intervals/TCs and patient characteristics were systematically registered, as well as AEs and skin lesions appearance. RESULTS: A total of 109 patients (72 CD and 37 UC) contributed 2913 IFX TCs. During a median follow-up of 3.0 [1.5-4.5] years, we observed 684 AEs in 101 patients and 49 skin lesions in 35 patients. There was no significant difference (p = .467) in median TCs between patients with and without skin lesions. However, higher median IFX doses were associated with an increased hazard rate of skin lesions [HR 1.084 (1.024-1.148), p = .005], in addition to female sex [2.210 (1.187-5.310), p = .016] and diagnosis of CD [1.695 (1.241-1.877), p = .011]. Considering IFX therapeutic TC cut-offs of 5.0 and 9.0 µg/mL, there was no significant difference in AE rate (p = .749 and p = .833, respectively). Also, no significant association between IFX doses and AE rate (p = .159). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the IFX dose to achieve therapeutic TCs may not increase the overall risk of AEs in paediatric IBD patients. However, concerns arise regarding the risk of skin lesions, especially in female CD patients.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of monoclonal antibodies in chronic inflammatory diseases: A snapshot of laboratories and applications across Europe.

The European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) action ENOTTA (The European Network on Optimising Treatment with Therapeutic Antibodies in chronic inflammatory diseases) was launched in 2022. To pave the way for harmonization of analytical methods for quantitation of serum levels of therapeutic antibodies in research and clinical settings, ENOTTA recently performed an online survey mapping laboratories in the field. The survey, which contained 30 questions surrounding therapeutic drug monitoring of relevant drugs and anti-drug antibodies, was distributed via the ENOTTA and European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory networks. Among 63 respondents across Europe, 45 reported analytical activity, with a range of utilized methods. Future engagement of as many sites as possible will enable comparison of methodologies and facilitate progress in the field.

TRPA1 Antagonist LY3526318 Inhibits the Cinnamaldehyde-Evoked Dermal Blood Flow Increase: Translational Proof of Pharmacology.

Transient receptor potential Ankyrin 1 (TRPA1) is an ion channel expressed by sensory neurons, where it mediates pain signaling. Consequently, it has emerged as a promising target for novel analgesics, yet, to date, no TRPA1 antagonists have been approved for clinical use. In the present translational study, we utilized dermal blood flow changes evoked by TRPA1 agonist cinnamaldehyde as a target engagement biomarker to investigate the in vivo pharmacology of LY3526318, a novel TRPA1 antagonist. In rats, LY3526318 (1, 3, and 10 mg/kg, p.o.) dose-dependently reduced the cutaneous vasodilation typically observed following topical application of 10% v/v cinnamaldehyde. The inhibition was significant at the site of cinnamaldehyde application and also when including an adjacent area of skin. Similarly, in a cohort of 16 healthy human volunteers, LY3526318 administration (10, 30, and 100 mg, p.o.) dose-dependently reduced the elevated blood flow surrounding the site of 10% v/v cinnamaldehyde application, with a trend toward inhibition at the site of application. Comparisons between both species reveal that the effects of LY3526318 on the cinnamaldehyde-induced dermal blood flow are greater in rats relative to humans, even when adjusting for cross-species differences in potency of the compound at TRPA1. Exposure-response relationships suggest that a greater magnitude response may be observed in humans if higher antagonist concentrations could be achieved. Taken together, these results demonstrate that cinnamaldehyde-evoked changes in dermal blood flow can be utilized as a target engagement biomarker for TRPA1 activity and that LY3526318 antagonizes the ion channel both in rats and humans.

Isavuconazole Exposure in Critically Ill Patients Treated with Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Two Case Reports and a Narrative Literature Review.

Effective dosing of isavuconazole in patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is important due to the role of isavuconazole as a first-line treatment in patients with influenza- and COVID-19-associated pulmonary aspergillosis. To date, robust pharmacokinetic data in patients supported by ECMO are limited. Therefore, it is unknown whether ECMO independently impacts isavuconazole exposure. We measured isavuconazole plasma concentrations in two patients supported by ECMO and estimated individual pharmacokinetic parameters using non-compartmental analysis and two previously published population pharmacokinetic models. Furthermore, a narrative literature review on isavuconazole exposure in adult patients receiving ECMO was performed. The 24 h areas under the concentration-time curve and trough concentrations of isavuconazole were lower in both patients compared with exposure values published before. In the literature, highly variable isavuconazole concentrations have been documented in patients with ECMO support. The independent effect of ECMO versus critical illness itself on isavuconazole exposure cannot be deduced from our and previously published (case) reports. Pending additional data, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended in critically ill patients, regardless of ECMO support.

Drug Repurposing for Targeting Myeloid-Derived Suppressor-Cell-Generated Immunosuppression in Ovarian Cancer: A Literature Review of Potential Candidates.

The lethality of patients with ovarian cancer (OC) remains high. Current treatment strategies often do not lead to the desired outcome due to the development of therapy resistance, resulting in high relapse rates. Additionally, clinical trials testing immunotherapy against OC have failed to reach significant results to date. The OC tumor microenvironment and specifically myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) are known to generate immunosuppression and inhibit the anti-tumor immune response following immunotherapy treatment. Our review aims to characterize potential candidate treatments to target MDSC in OC through drug-repurposing. A literature search identified repurposable compounds with evidence of their suppressing the effect of MDSC. A total of seventeen compounds were withheld, of which four were considered the most promising. Lurbinectedin, metformin, celecoxib, and 5-azacytidine have reported preclinical effects on MDSC and clinical evidence in OC. They have all been approved for a different indication, characterizing them as the most promising candidates for repurposing to treat patients with OC.

Insights into the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Older Adults with Atrial Fibrillation: A Structured Narrative Review.

Older adults, the fastest growing population, represent almost 50% of all users of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Unfortunately, we have very little relevant pharmacological and clinical data on DOACs, especially in older adults with geriatric profiles. This is highly relevant as pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) often differ substantially in this population. Hence, we need to obtain a better understanding of the PK/PD of DOACs in older adults, to ensure appropriate treatment. This review summarises the current insights into PK/PD of DOACs in older adults. A search was undertaken up to October 2022 to identify PK/PD studies of apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban, that included older adults aged ≥ 75 years. This review identified 44 articles. Older age alone did not influence exposure of edoxaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran, while apixaban peak concentrations were 40% higher in older adults than in young volunteers. Nevertheless, high interindividual variability in DOAC exposure in older adults was noted, which can be explained by distinctive older patient characteristics, such as kidney function, changes in body composition (especially reduced muscle mass), and co-medication with P-gp inhibitors, which is in line with the current dosing reduction criteria of apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. Dabigatran had the largest interindividual variability among all DOACs since its dose adjustment criterion is only age, and thus it is not a preferable option. Additionally, DOAC exposure, which fell outside of on-therapy ranges, was significantly related to stroke and bleeding events. No definite thresholds linked to these outcomes in older adults have been established.

A Model-Based Tool for Guiding Infliximab Induction Dosing to Maximize Long-term Deep Remission in Children with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adequate infliximab concentrations during induction treatment are predictive for deep remission [corticosteroid-free clinical and endoscopic remission] at 6 months in children with inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD]. Under standard infliximab induction dosing, children often have low infliximab trough concentrations. Model-informed precision dosing [MIPD; i.e. model-based therapeutic drug monitoring] is advocated as a promising infliximab dosing strategy. We aimed to develop and validate an MIPD framework for guiding paediatric infliximab induction treatment. METHODS: Data from 31 children with IBD [4-18 years] receiving standard infliximab induction dosing (5 mg/kg at week [w]0, w2 and w6) were repurposed. Eight paediatric population pharmacokinetic models were evaluated. Modelling and simulation were used to identify exposure targets, identify an optimal sampling strategy, and develop a multi-model prediction algorithm for implementation into an MIPD software tool. A role for infliximab clearance monitoring was evaluated. RESULTS: A 7.5 mg/L infliximab concentration target at w12 was associated with 64% probability of deep remission at 6 months. With standard dosing, less than 80% of simulated children <40 kg attained this target. The w12 target was most accurately and precisely achieved by implementing MIPD at w6 using the w6 infliximab concentration [rapid assay required]. The multi-model algorithm outperformed single models when optimizing the w6 dose based on both w2 and w4 concentrations. MIPD using only the w2 concentration resulted in biased and imprecise predictions. Infliximab clearances at w6 and w12 were predictive for deep remission. CONCLUSIONS: A freely available, multi-model MIPD tool facilitates infliximab induction dosing and improves deep remission rates in children with IBD.

Liposomal amphotericin B exposure in critically ill patients: a prospective pharmacokinetic study.

Liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) is a broad-spectrum antifungal drug. Little is known about its pharmacokinetics (PK) in critically ill patients. The aim of this study was to document the PK of L-AmB in this population. It was also explored if covariates may be identified that influence its exposure. All adult, critically ill patients (at the intensive care unit or hematology ward) treated with L-AmB between October 2016 and January 2020 were eligible for this study. The administered dose was left at the discretion of the treating clinician. Plasma samples were collected at predose and 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 h postdose at an early (day 2-3) and/or later (≥ day 6) treatment day. Additionally, daily trough concentrations were collected until day 14. Of 33 included patients, 31 were evaluable; their median [IQR] age and body weight was 59 [54-64] years and 68 [59-77] kg, respectively. L-AmB was administered at doses between 2.7 mg/kg and 12.3 mg/kg, with a median [IQR] trough concentration of 3.1 [2.0-4.7] mg/l. The overall median area under the 24 h concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) and peak plasma concentration (Cmax) were 169.0 [117.0-253.0] mg h/l and 23.2 [16.9-33.7] mg/l, respectively. A considerable intra- and interpatient PK variability for Cmax and AUC0-24 was observed but no explaining variables, except the administered dose, could be identified. The PK of L-AmB in critically ill patients was documented. A considerable variability in exposure was observed between and within patients; however, it was not associated with a multitude of patient-related characteristics.

L-AmB is marketed for decades to treat invasive fungal infections; however, not much is known about its exposure. We documented L-AmB exposure in 31 critically ill patients. Although median exposure was similar compared to noncritically ill patients, a considerable variability was observed.

Ceftriaxone dosing based on the predicted probability of augmented renal clearance in critically ill patients with pneumonia.

OBJECTIVES: PTA of protein-unbound ceftriaxone may be compromised in critically ill patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) with augmented renal clearance (ARC). We aimed to determine an optimized ceftriaxone dosage regimen based on the probability of developing ARC on the next day (PARC,d+1; www.arcpredictor.com). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients enrolled in a prospective cohort study were admitted to the ICU with severe CAP and treated with ceftriaxone 2 g once daily. Patients contributed 259 total ceftriaxone concentrations, collected during 1 or 2 days (±7 samples/day). Unbound fractions of ceftriaxone were determined in all peak and trough samples (n = 76). Population pharmacokinetic modelling and simulation were performed using NONMEM7.4. Target attainment was defined as an unbound ceftriaxone concentration >4 mg/L throughout the dosing interval. RESULTS: A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model described the data well. The maximal protein-bound ceftriaxone concentration decreased with lower serum albumin. Ceftriaxone clearance increased with body weight and PARC,d+1 determined on the previous day. A high PARC,d+1 was identified as a clinically relevant predictor for underexposure on the next day (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve 0.77). Body weight had a weak predictive value and was therefore considered clinically irrelevant. Serum albumin had no predictive value. An optimal PARC,d+1 threshold of 5.7% was identified (sensitivity 73%, specificity 69%). Stratified once- or twice-daily 2 g dosing when below or above the 5.7% PARC,d+1 cut-off, respectively, was predicted to result in 81% PTA compared with 47% PTA under population-level once-daily 2 g dosing. CONCLUSIONS: Critically ill patients with CAP with a high PARC,d+1 may benefit from twice-daily 2 g ceftriaxone dosing for achieving adequate exposure on the next day.

Systematic Comparison of Hospital-Wide Standard and Model-Based Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Vancomycin in Adults.

We aimed to evaluate the predictive performance and predicted doses of a single-model approach or several multi-model approaches compared with the standard therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM)-based vancomycin dosing. We performed a hospital-wide monocentric retrospective study in adult patients treated with either intermittent or continuous vancomycin infusions. Each patient provided two randomly selected pairs of two consecutive vancomycin concentrations. A web-based precision dosing software, TDMx, was used to evaluate the model-based approaches. In total, 154 patients contributed 308 pairs. With standard TDM-based dosing, only 48.1% (148/308) of all of the second concentrations were within the therapeutic range. Across the model-based approaches we investigated, the mean relative bias and relative root mean square error varied from -5.36% to 3.18% and from 24.8% to 28.1%, respectively. The model averaging approach according to the squared prediction errors showed an acceptable bias and was the most precise. According to this approach, the median (interquartile range) differences between the model-predicted and prescribed doses, expressed as mg every 12 h, were 113 [-69; 427] mg, -70 [-208; 120], mg and 40 [-84; 197] mg in the case of subtherapeutic, supratherapeutic, and therapeutic exposure at the second concentration, respectively. These dose differences, along with poor target attainment, suggest a large window of opportunity for the model-based TDM compared with the standard TDM-based vancomycin dosing. Implementation studies of model-based TDM in routine care are warranted.