The effect of immersion disinfection of elastomeric impressions on the surface detail reproduction of improved gypsum casts.

This investigation examined improved gypsum casts for surface roughness and line-detail reproduction after the immersion disinfection of elastomeric impression materials in an acid glutaraldehyde, an alkaline glutaraldehyde, and a phenol. Impressions were made of a surface roughness standard (Ra = 3.08 microns) that was custom made to include engraved grooves following American Dental Association specification No. 19. Mean surface roughness (Ra) values for all casts of all combinations of disinfectant treatments, impression materials, and improved gypsum stones were obtained with a surface analyzer. Untreated impressions served as controls. Data examined by an analysis of variance indicated that the addition silicone and polyether impression materials provided a surface roughness similar to the precision displacement specimen standard. The acid glutaraldehyde disinfectant demonstrated enhanced line-detail reproduction compared with the standard. Addition silicone and polyether impression materials combined with the acid glutaraldehyde provided the model system closest to the mean surface roughness of the reference standard. These combinations revealed differences in the surface roughness reproduction among the represented improved dental stones.

The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.

This study evaluated the accuracy of reproduction of stone casts made from impressions using different tray and impression materials. The tray materials used were an acrylic resin, a thermoplastic, and a plastic. The impression materials used were an additional silicone, a polyether, and a polysulfide. Impressions were made of a stainless steel master die that simulated crown preparations for a fixed partial denture and an acrylic resin model with cross-arch and anteroposterior landmarks in stainless steel that typify clinical intra-arch distances. Impressions of the fixed partial denture simulation were made with all three impression materials and all three tray types. Impressions of the cross-arch and anteroposterior landmarks were made by using all three tray types with only the addition reaction silicone impression material. Impressions were poured at 1 hour with a type IV dental stone. Data were analyzed by using ANOVA with a sample size of five. Results indicated that custom-made trays of acrylic resin and the thermoplastic material performed similarly regarding die accuracy and produced clinically acceptable casts. The stock plastic tray consistently produced casts with greater dimensional change than the two custom trays.

The accuracy and efficacy of disinfection by spray atomization on elastomeric impressions.

Five disinfectants applied by spray atomization were examined for possible dimensional distortion of elastomeric impression materials, polyether, polysulfide, and addition silicone, and the associated improved, type IV gypsum casts. The disinfectants did not affect, in a clinically significant manner, the three dimensions measured with an instrument accurate to 1 micron on improved gypsum casts that reproduced a stainless steel standard. The master cast represented two teeth of a fixed partial denture prepared for complete veneer retainers. The use of control casts from elastomeric impressions that were not treated with the disinfectants further supported previous investigations reporting the accuracy of dental casts as the function of the impression material. The use of a spray disinfectant will not appreciably alter the dimensional accuracy of improved stone casts made within elastomeric impressions. The most accurate stone cast system was produced by addition silicone impressions disinfected by a surface spray. It was also shown that four of the disinfectants applied by spray atomization were effective in disinfecting the surface of an elastomeric impression material contaminated with selected test organisms.

Accuracy of elastomeric impressions disinfected by immersion.

This study evaluates the accuracy and surface quality of stone dies made from impressions that had been placed in disinfectants. Results indicated that selection of the type of impression material is more important than selection of the disinfectant. Addition silicone and polysulfide impressions were disinfected without a loss in accuracy, whereas polyether impressions were adversely affected. The surface quality of dies was acceptable with disinfection and one disinfectant contributed to an improvement in surface quality compared with the control.