Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in elderly and very elderly patients: safety, outcomes, and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) risk increases with age. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in the older population. METHODS: All patients undergoing AF ablation (2013-2021) at our institution were enrolled in a prospectively maintained registry. The primary endpoint was AF recurrence. Patients were divided into 3 groups: non-elderly (< 65 years), elderly (65-75 years), and very elderly (> 75 years). Patient surveys at baseline and during follow-up were used to calculate quality of life (QoL) metrics: the AF severity score as well as the AF burden. RESULTS: A total of 7020 patients were included (42% non-elderly, 42% elderly, and 16% very elderly). Periprocedural major complications were low (< 1.5%) and similar in all groups besides pericardial effusion which was more frequent with older age and similar between the elderly and very elderly. At 3 years, AF recurrence for persistent AF (PersAF) was highest in the very elderly group (48%), followed by the elderly group (42%), and was the lowest in the non-elderly group (36%). In paroxysmal AF (PAF), there was no difference in AF recurrence between the elderly and non-elderly, while the very elderly remained associated with a significantly increased risk. Multivariable Cox analysis confirmed these findings (PersAF; elderly: HR = 1.23, P = 0.003; very elderly: HR = 1.44, P < 0.001) (PAF; elderly: HR = 1.04, P = 0.62; very elderly: HR = 1.30, P = 0.01). Catheter ablation resulted in a significant improvement in quality of life, irrespective of age group. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation in elderly and very elderly patients is safe, efficacious, and associated with QoL benefits. Overall, major complications were minimal and did not differ significantly between age groups, with the exception of pericardial effusions which were higher in the elderly and very elderly compared to non-elderly adults. Very elderly patients had a higher rate of AF recurrence when compared with elderly or non-elderly patients. Nevertheless, ablation resulted in a remarkable improvement in QoL and a reduction of AF burden and AF symptoms with a similar magnitude, irrespective of age.

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Young Adults: Measuring Quality of Life Using Patient-Reported Outcomes Over 5 Years.

BACKGROUND: Ablation is used for both rhythm control and improved quality of life (QoL) in atrial fibrillation (AF). It has been suggested that young adults may experience high recurrence rates after ablation and data remain lacking regarding QoL benefits. We aimed to investigate AF ablation outcomes and QoL benefits in young adults undergoing AF ablation using a large prospectively maintained registry and automated patient-reported outcomes (PRO). METHODS: All patients undergoing AF ablation (2013-2016) at our center were prospectively enrolled. Patients aged 50 years or younger were included. For PROs, QoL measures and symptoms were assessed at baseline, 3 months after ablation, and every 6 months thereafter. The AF severity score served as the main assessment of QoL. RESULTS: A total of 241 young adults (age, 16-50 years) were included (17% female, 40.3% persistent AF). In all, 77.2% of patients remained arrhythmia-free during the first year of follow-up (80% in nonstructural AF and 66% in structural AF). Using PROs, 90% of patients reported improvement in QoL throughout all survey time points up to 5 years postablation (P<0.0001). The baseline median AF severity score was 14 and improved to between 2 and 4 on all follow-up after ablation (P<0.0001). Patients also reported fewer and shorter AF episodes, fewer emergency room visits secondary to AF, and fewer hospitalizations (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Ablation remains an effective rhythm-control strategy in young adults with AF. Young adults also experience significant improvement in QoL with reduction of the frequency and duration of AF episodes and AF-related healthcare utilization.

Impact of redo ablation for atrial fibrillation on patient-reported outcomes and quality of life.

INTRODUCTION: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequently used for the purpose of rhythm control and improved quality of life (QoL). Although success rates are high, a significant proportion of patients require redo ablation. Data are scarce on patient-centered outcomes and QoL in patients undergoing redo AF ablation. We aimed to assess QoL and clinical outcomes using a large prospectively maintained patient-reported outcomes (PRO) registry. METHODS: All patients undergoing redo AF ablation (2013-2016) at our center were enrolled in a prospective registry for outcomes and assessed for QoL using automated PRO surveys (baseline, 3 and 6 months after ablation, every 6 months thereafter). Data were collected over 3 years of follow-up. The atrial fibrillation symptom severity scale (AFSSS) was used as the main measure for QoL. Additional variables included patient-reported improvement, AF burden, and AF-related healthcare utilization including emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations. RESULTS: A total of 848 patients were included (28% females, mean age 63.8, 51% persistent AF). By automated PRO, significant improvement in QoL was noted (baseline median AFSSS of 12 [5-18] and ranged between 2 and 4 on subsequent assessments; p < .0001), with ≥70%of patients reported remarkable improvement in their AF-related symptoms. The proportion of patients in AF at the time of baseline survey was 36%, and this decreased to <8% across all time points during follow-up (p < .0001). AF burden was significantly reduced (including frequency and duration of episodes; p < .0001), with an associated decrease in healthcare utilization after 6 months from the time of ablation (including ER visits and hospitalizations; p < .0001). The proportion of patients on anticoagulants or antiarrhythmics decreased on follow-up across all time points (p < .0001 for all variables). CONCLUSION: Most patients derive significant QoL benefit from redo AF ablation; with reduction of both AF burden and healthcare utilization.

Super and Nonresponders to Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Quality-of-Life Assessment Using Patient Reported Outcomes.

[Figure: see text].

Clinical Outcomes and Characteristics With Dofetilide in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Considered for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator.

BACKGROUND: Dofetilide is one of the only anti-arrhythmic agents approved for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, postapproval data and safety outcomes are limited. In this study, we assessed the incidence and predictors of LVEF improvement, safety, and outcomes in patients with AF with LVEF ≤35% without prior implantable cardioverter defibrillator, cardiac resynchronization therapy, or AF ablation. METHODS: An analysis of 168 consecutive patients from 2007 to 2016 was performed. Incidences of adverse events, drug continuation, implantable cardioverter defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation, LVEF improvement (>35%) and recovery (≥50%), AF recurrence, and AF ablation were determined. Multivariable regression analysis to identify predictors of LVEF improvement/recovery was performed. RESULTS: The mean age was 64±12 years. Dofetilide was discontinued before hospital discharge in 46 (27%) because of QT prolongation (14%), torsades de pointe or polymorphic ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (6% [sustained 3%, nonsustained 3%]), ineffectiveness (5%), or other causes (3%). At 1 year, 43% remained on dofetilide. Freedom from AF was 42% at 1 year, and 40% underwent future AF ablation. LVEF recovered (≥50%) in 45% and improved to >35% in 73%. Predictors of LVEF improvement included presence of AF during echocardiogram (odds ratio, 4.22 [95% CI, 1.71-10.4], P=0.002), coronary artery disease (odds ratio, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.16-0.79], P=0.01), left atrial diameter (odds ratio, 0.52 per 1 cm increase [95% CI, 0.30-0.90], P=0.01), and LVEF (odds ratio, per 1% increase, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.02-1.16], P=0.006). The C statistic was 0.78. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LVEF ≤35%, who are potential implantable cardioverter defibrillator candidates, treated with dofetilide as an initial anti-arrhythmic strategy for AF, drug discontinuation rates were high, and many underwent future AF ablation. However, most patients had improvement in LVEF, obviating the need for primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Catheter Ablation in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: There is paucity of data regarding radiofrequency ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with cardiogenic shock and concomitant VT refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs on mechanical support. METHODS: Patients undergoing VT ablation at our center were enrolled in a prospectively maintained registry and screened for the current study (2010-2017). RESULTS: All 21 consecutive patients with cardiogenic shock and concomitant refractory ventricular arrhythmia undergoing bailout ablation due to inability to wean off mechanical support were included. Median age was 61 years, 86% were men, median left ventricular ejection fraction was 20%, 81% had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and PAINESD score was 18±5. The type of mechanical support in place before the procedure was intra-aortic balloon pump in 14 patients (67%), Impella CP in 2, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in 2, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and intra-aortic balloon pump in 2, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella CP in 1. Endocardial voltage maps showed myocardial scar in 19 patients (90%). The clinical VTs were inducible in 13 patients (62%), whereas 6 patients had premature ventricular contraction-induced ventricular fibrillation/VT (29%), and VT could not be induced in 2 patients (9%). Activation mapping was possible in all 13 with inducible clinical VTs. Substrate modification was performed in 15 patients with scar (79%). After ablation and scar modification, the arrhythmia was noninducible in 19 patients (91%). Seventeen (81%) were eventually weaned off mechanical support successfully, but 6 (29%) died during the index admission from persistent cardiogenic shock. Patients who had ventricular arrhythmia and cardiogenic shock on presentation had a trend toward lower in-hospital mortality compared with those who presented with cardiogenic shock and later developed ventricular arrhythmia. CONCLUSIONS: Bailout ablation for refractory ventricular arrhythmia in cardiogenic shock allowed successful weaning from mechanical support in a large proportion of patients. Mortality remains high, but the majority of patients were discharged home and survived beyond 1 year.

Life-Threatening Complications of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: 16-Year Experience in a Large Prospective Tertiary Care Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the incidence and outcomes of life-threatening complications from atrial fibrillation ablations in a high volume center. BACKGROUND: With increasing rates of atrial fibrillation ablation procedures, an increase in life-threatening procedure-related complications has been reported despite improvements in technology and ablation strategies. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2015, 10,378 patients underwent atrial fibrillation ablation at our institution and were enrolled in a prospectively maintained data registry. We identified all patients who had life-threatening cardiac, neurological, respiratory, or vascular complications to the ablation resulting in death or requiring emergent intervention. RESULTS: Major life-threatening complications occurred in 100 patients (0.9%). The most common was pericardial effusion requiring pericardiocentesis (0.5%), with 7 (0.07%) requiring emergent surgical repair for cardiac perforation. Stroke occurred in 27 patients (0.3%) with a vast majority having an ischemic stroke (93%) followed by hemorrhagic (3.5%) and ischemic stroke with hemorrhagic conversion (3.5%). The yearly incidence of stroke decreased from an average of 1.1% per year in the first tertile (2000 to 2004) to 0.2% per year in the last 2 tertiles (2005 to 2015). Permanent neurological deficits occurred in 23 patients. Vascular complications causing hemorrhagic shock occurred in 7 patients (0.06%), 5 of whom required urgent surgical intervention. Acute coronary syndrome requiring urgent percutaneous coronary revascularization occurred in 2 patients whereas 1 developed a right coronary artery air embolus. No procedural death or atrio-esophageal fistulae occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In a large quaternary care center, the incidence of life-threatening complications is low. Experienced operators, high volume, continuous quality improvement initiatives, and efficient back-up support have allowed exemplary safety profiles and 0 procedure-related deaths over 16 years.

Outcomes and Management of Patients With Severe Pulmonary Vein Stenosis From Prior Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein (PV) stenosis remains a feared complication of atrial fibrillation ablation. Little is known about outcomes in patients with severe PV stenosis, especially about repeat ablations. METHODS: In 10 368 patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation (2000-2015), computed tomography scans were obtained 3 to 6 months after ablation. The clinical outcomes in severe PV stenosis were determined. RESULTS: Severe PV stenosis was diagnosed in 52 patients (0.5%). This involved mostly the left superior PV (51% of severely stenosed veins). Percutaneous interventions were performed in 43 patients, and complications occurred in 5: 3 PV ruptures, 1 stroke, and 1 phrenic injury. Over a median follow-up of 25 months, 41 (79%) patients remained arrhythmia free. Repeat ablation was performed in 15 patients (7 from the main series and 8 from prior ablation at other institutions); of whom 10 had PV stents in place. Conduction recovery was noted in all but 2 of the stenosed or stented PVs, and areas with recovery were targeted with antral ablation. Lasso entrapment within stents occurred in 2 patients but eventually freed without complications. After redo ablation, preplanned stenting was performed in 3 patients and computed tomographic scans showed progression of concomitant stenoses in 1 patient (moderate to severe). No procedure-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of severe PV stenosis is low but remains associated with significant morbidity. In patients with recurrent arrhythmia, conduction recovery at the stenosed or stented veins is common. Care must be taken to ablate antrally to avoid stenosis progression. In patients with prior PV stents, we suggest to avoid using Lasso.

Real-time guidewire localization using impedance-based electroanatomic mapping: experimental results and clinical validation during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Cryoballoon ablation is an emerging therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the Arctic Front cryoballoon (Medtronic) cannot be localized on current electroanatomic mapping (EAM) systems. We describe a technique to visualize guidewires in an impedance-based EAM system. METHODS AND RESULTS: A novel technique for real-time guidewire localization in an EAM (Ensite Velocity, St Jude Medical) was prospectively evaluated among patients referred for cryoballoon AF ablation. The guidewire was visualized as an 'orb' on the EAM and localization in each of the pulmonary veins (PVs) compared with orthogonal fluoroscopy, contrast venography, and intra-cardiac echocardiography. Application of the technique in 21 consecutive patients [median age 58 (interquartile range 21); 71.4% male; 85.7% paroxysmal AF] demonstrated agreement with respect to guidewire localization in 82 of 82 (100%) PVs. Discrimination of guidewire position in the left atrial appendage from the left PVs was also demonstrated. When compared with 21 consecutive cryoballoon procedures over the same time period in which the technique was not used, fluoroscopy time was reduced [median 53.2 (25.9) vs. 72.3 (47.6) min, P = 0.008], and a trend towards reduced radiation exposure [median 372 (656.0) vs. 581 (849.9) mGy, P = 0.08] was noted, without effect on acute procedural or mid-term endpoints. Ex vivo assessment of the technique in a saline bath left atrial model demonstrated that the 'orb' localizes to the centroid of the exposed portion of the guidewire. CONCLUSION: This simple, novel technique provides real-time, accurate guidewire localization to enable guidewire and catheter navigation during cryoballoon AF ablation.

Percutaneous pericardial instrumentation for endo-epicardial mapping of previously failed ablations.

BACKGROUND: The epicardial location of an arrhythmia could be responsible for unsuccessful endocardial catheter ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 48 patients referred after prior unsuccessful endocardial ablation, we considered percutaneous, subxiphoid instrumentation of the pericardial space for mapping and ablation. Thirty patients had ventricular tachycardia (VT), 6 patients had a right- and 4 had a left-sided accessory pathway (AP), 4 patients had inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and 4 patients had atrial arrhythmias. Of the 30 VTs, 24 (6 with ischemic cardiomyopathy, 3 with idiopathic cardiomyopathy, and 15 with normal hearts) appeared to originate from the epicardium. Seventeen (71%) of these 24 VTs were successfully ablated with epicardial lesions. The other 7 VTs had early epicardial sites that were inaccessible, predominantly because of interference from the left atrial appendage. Six of these were successfully ablated from the left coronary cusp. In 5 of the 10 patients with an AP, the earliest activation was recorded epicardially. Three of these were right atrial appendage-to-right ventricle APs, and epicardial ablation was successful. No significant complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Failure of endocardial ablation could reflect the presence of an epicardial arrhythmia substrate. Epicardial instrumentation and ablation appeared feasible and safe and provided an alternative strategy for the treatment of patients with a variety of arrhythmias. This was particularly true for VT, including patients without structural heart disease.

Use of intracardiac echocardiography for prediction of chronic pulmonary vein stenosis after ablation of atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Measurements of pulmonary vein (PV) flow with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) immediately before and after PV isolation may be a useful method for predicting which patients will develop chronic PV stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed preablation and postablation flows in each of the four PVs using a phase-array ICE catheter in 95 patients (mean age 52 +/- 13) undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. The ostium of each of the PVs was defined using angiography, electrical mapping, and ICE imaging. Ostial electrical isolation of all PVs was achieved using a 4-mm cooled-tip radiofrequency ablation catheter. Change in PV flow, when present, was examined as both an absolute value and as a percentage of the baseline flow. All patients underwent spiral computed tomography (CT) scans of the PVs 3 months after the procedure for detection of stenosis. The average preablation diastolic flows for the left superior, left inferior, right superior, and right inferior veins were 0.56, 0.54, 0.47, and 0.45 m/sec, respectively. These values increased to 0.74, 0.67, 0.58, and 0.59 m/sec postablation (P < 0.001). Of 380 PVs ablated, the CT scans revealed 2 (1%) with severe (>70%) stenosis, 13 (3%) with moderate (51%-70%) stenosis, and 62 (16%) with mild (< or = 50%) stenosis. The r value between flow and stenosis was only 0.09 (P = NS). CONCLUSION: Acute changes in PV flow immediately after ostial PV isolation do not appear to be a strong predictor of chronic PV stenosis.

Bradyarrhythmias.

In our opinion, the term bradyarrhythmia should be reserved for bradycardias (heart rates less than 60) that are associated with symptoms such as syncope or near-syncope, congestive heart failure, exercise intolerance, fatigue, or a confusional state that improves with resolution of the bradycardia. The mere presence of a bradycardia that is not associated with these symptoms almost never justifies aggressive intervention, with few notable exceptions. It is important to determine if the bradyarrhythmia will not resolve spontaneously or with the alleviation of a condition that is the likely cause of the bradyarrhythmia. If a hemodynamically stable patient can be observed safely while being treated for a metabolic or ischemic condition or an adverse drug reaction, then it is not justified to implant a permanent pacemaker, though a temporary pacemaker may be necessary in the interim. Certain forms of reflex-mediated syncope have an element of inappropriate bradycardia that may be amenable to pacing. Pacemaker implantation should be considered for patients with recurrent vasovagal or situational syncope that is refractory to other therapies. The treatment of specific bradyarrhythmias should be in accordance with the guidelines laid forth by the joint councils of the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology.