Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dis Esophagus ; 2024 May 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745429

RESUMO

Anastomotic leakage (AL) is a dreaded complication following esophageal resection. No clear consensus exist for the optimal handling of this severe complication. The aim of this study was to describe the treatment outcome following AL. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study including all patients with AL operated with Ivor Lewis esophagectomy from 2010 to 2021 at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. 74/526 (14%) patients had AL. Patient outcomes were analyzed and categorized according to main AL treatment strategy; stent (54%), endoscopic vacuum therapy and stent (EVT + stent) (19%), nasogastric tube and antibiotics (conservative) (16%), EVT (8%) and by other endoscopic means (other) (3%). One patient had surgical debridement of the chest cavity. In 66 patients (89%), the perforation healed after median 27 (range: 4-174) days. Airway fistulation was observed in 11 patients (15%). Leak severity (ECCG) was associated with development of airway fistula (P = 0.03). The median hospital and intensive care unit stays were 30 (range: 12-285) and 9 (range: 0-60) days. The 90-days mortality among patients with AL was 5% and at follow up, 13% of all deaths were related to AL. AL closure rates were comparable across the groups, but longer in the EVT + stent group (55 days vs. 29.5 days, P = 0.04). Thirty-two percent developed a symptomatic anastomotic stricture within 12 months. Conclusion: The majority of AL can be treated endoscopically with preservation of the conduit and the anastomosis. We observed a high number of AL-associated airway fistulas.

3.
Acta Paediatr ; 109(6): 1125-1130, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31999863

RESUMO

AIM: To study whether a simple targeted intervention could reduce unwarranted antibiotic treatment in near-term and term neonates with suspected, but not confirmed early-onset sepsis. METHODS: A quality improvement initiative in three Norwegian neonatal intensive care units. The intervention included an inter-hospital clinical practice guideline for discontinuing antibiotics after 36-48 hours if sepsis was no longer suspected and blood cultures were negative in neonates ≥ 34+0 weeks of gestation. Two units used procalcitonin in decision-making. We compared data 12-14 months before and after guideline implementation. The results are presented as median with interquartile ranges. RESULTS: A total of 284 infants (2.5% of all births ≥ 34+0 weeks of gestation) received antibiotics before and 195 (1.8%) after guideline implementation (P = .0018). The two units that used procalcitonin discontinued antibiotics earlier after guideline implementation than the unit without procalcitonin. Neonates not diagnosed with sepsis were treated 49 (31-84) hours before and 48 (36-72) hours after guideline implementation (P = .68). In all infants, including those diagnosed with sepsis, antibiotic treatment duration was reduced from 108 (60-144) to 96 (48-120) hours (P = .013). CONCLUSION: Antibiotic treatment duration for suspected, but not confirmed early-onset sepsis did not change. However, treatment duration for all infants and the proportion of infants commenced on antibiotics were reduced.


Assuntos
Sepse Neonatal , Sepse , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Sepse Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepse Neonatal/tratamento farmacológico , Noruega , Melhoria de Qualidade , Sepse/diagnóstico , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...