Towards an alternative testing strategy for nanomaterials used in nanomedicine: lessons from NanoTEST.

In spite of recent advances in describing the health outcomes of exposure to nanoparticles (NPs), it still remains unclear how exactly NPs interact with their cellular targets. Size, surface, mass, geometry, and composition may all play a beneficial role as well as causing toxicity. Concerns of scientists, politicians and the public about potential health hazards associated with NPs need to be answered. With the variety of exposure routes available, there is potential for NPs to reach every organ in the body but we know little about the impact this might have. The main objective of the FP7 NanoTEST project ( www.nanotest-fp7.eu ) was a better understanding of mechanisms of interactions of NPs employed in nanomedicine with cells, tissues and organs and to address critical issues relating to toxicity testing especially with respect to alternatives to tests on animals. Here we describe an approach towards alternative testing strategies for hazard and risk assessment of nanomaterials, highlighting the adaptation of standard methods demanded by the special physicochemical features of nanomaterials and bioavailability studies. The work has assessed a broad range of toxicity tests, cell models and NP types and concentrations taking into account the inherent impact of NP properties and the effects of changes in experimental conditions using well-characterized NPs. The results of the studies have been used to generate recommendations for a suitable and robust testing strategy which can be applied to new medical NPs as they are developed.

Glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms influence the level of oxidative DNA damage and antioxidant protection in humans.

Glutathione S-transferase genotypes GSTT1, GSTM1, GSTP1 were characterised in 155 middle-aged men and compared with parameters of oxidative stress at the level of DNA and lipids, with antioxidant enzymes, and with plasma antioxidants in smokers and non-smokers. Smokers had on average significantly lower levels of Vitamin C, beta-carotene and beta-cryptoxanthin and higher amounts of oxidised purines and pyrimidines in lymphocyte DNA. The GSTM1 null genotype was associated with elevated glutathione as well as with higher Vitamin C concentration in plasma. Vitamin C was higher in GSTT1+ compared with GSTT1 null--as was glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. The homozygous GSTP1 a/a genotype was associated with significantly higher levels of GST activity measured in lymphocytes, in comparison with the b/b genotype. Using multifactorial statistical analysis we found significant associations between smoking, GSTP1 genotype, plasma Vitamin C, and purine base damage in lymphocyte DNA. The difference in Vitamin C plasma levels between smokers and non-smokers was seen only with the GSTP1 b/b genotype. This group accounted also for most of the increase in purine oxidation in smokers. In contrast, the link between smoking and oxidised pyrimidines in DNA was seen only in the GSTT1 null group. It seems that polymorphisms in the phase II metabolising enzyme glutathione S-transferase may be important determinants of commonly measured biomarkers.