Neurocritical care education during neurology residency: AAN survey of US program directors.

OBJECTIVE: Limited information is available regarding the current state of neurocritical care education for neurology residents. The goal of our survey was to assess the need and current state of neurocritical care training for neurology residents. METHODS: A survey instrument was developed and, with the support of the American Academy of Neurology, distributed to residency program directors of 132 accredited neurology programs in the United States in 2011. RESULTS: A response rate of 74% (98 of 132) was achieved. A dedicated neuroscience intensive care unit (neuro-ICU) existed in 64%. Fifty-six percent of residency programs offer a dedicated rotation in the neuro-ICU, lasting 4 weeks on average. Where available, the neuro-ICU rotation was required in the vast majority (91%) of programs. Neurology residents' exposure to the fundamental principles of neurocritical care was obtained through a variety of mechanisms. Of program directors, 37% indicated that residents would be interested in performing away rotations in a neuro-ICU. From 2005 to 2010, the number of programs sending at least one resident into a neuro-ICU fellowship increased from 14% to 35%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the expansion of neurocritical care, large proportions of US neurology residents have limited exposure to a neuro-ICU and neurointensivists. Formal training in the principles of neurocritical care may be highly variable. The results of this survey suggest a charge to address the variability of resident education and to develop standardized curricula in neurocritical care for neurology residents.

The practice of neurology, 2000-2010: report of the AAN Member Research Subcommittee.

OBJECTIVE: To present an analysis of American Academy of Neurology (AAN) membership demographics and practice trends over the past decade. METHODS: Data from the 2009 AAN Census and 2010 Practice Profile Form (PPF) surveys were compared to results from 2004 and 2000 surveys. The Census was sent to all AAN members, and the PPF was sent to a random sample of US practicing neurologists. RESULTS: Since 2000, AAN membership increased by 31%, and the number of US neurologist-members increased by 14%. Mean age of US neurologists increased from 48.6 to 53.3 years, and 23.9% of neurologists are women. There was a 15% increase in the proportion of neurologists relative to the US population, from 3.41 neurologists per 100,000 population in 2000 to 3.92 neurologists in 2009. In 2009, 24.1% of US neurologists were in solo practice, 27.8% were in a neurology group, and 35.6% were in multispecialty/university settings, with little change in practice arrangements over time. The top 5 practice interest areas were unchanged since 2004 as were the number of hours devoted to patient care (42.3) or total work hours per week (57.1). Little change was observed in performed procedures, except increased use of botulinum toxin and nerve blocks and a decline in lumbar punctures. Neurologists rely more on physician assistants to see follow-up and new patients independently (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Despite advances in neurologic diagnosis and therapy, there has been little change in practice characteristics of US neurologists.

Education research: neurology residency training in the new millennium.

OBJECTIVE: To survey adult neurology program directors (ANPD) to identify their most pressing needs at a time of dramatic change in neurology resident education. METHODS: All US ANPD were surveyed in 2007 using an instrument adjusted from a 1999 survey instrument. The goal was to characterize current program content, the institution and evaluation of the core competencies, program director characteristics, program director support, the institution of work duty hour requirements, resident support, and the curriculum needs of program directors and programs. RESULTS: A response rate of 82.9% was obtained. There is a significant disconnect between administration time spent by ANPD and departmental/institutional support of this, with ANPD spending approximately 35% of a 50-hour week on administration with only 16.7% salary support. Rearrangement of rotations or services has been the most common mode for ANPD to deal with work duty hour requirements, with few programs employing mid level providers. Most ANPD do not feel work duty hour reform has improved resident education. More residents are entering fellowships following graduation than documented in the past. Curriculum deficiencies still exist for ANPD to meet all Neurology Program Requirements, especially for nontraditional neurology topics outside the conventional bounds of clinical neurology (e.g., practice management). Nearly one quarter of neurology residency programs do not have a meeting or book fund for every resident in the program. CONCLUSIONS: Adult neurology program directors (ANPDs) face multiple important financial and organizational hurdles. At a time of increasing complexity in medical education, ANPDs need more institutional support.