Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
2.
Psychol Med ; 41(8): 1751-61, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21134315

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The aim was to examine barriers to initiation and continuation of treatment among individuals with common mental disorders in the US general population. METHOD: Respondents in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication with common 12-month DSM-IV mood, anxiety, substance, impulse control and childhood disorders were asked about perceived need for treatment, structural barriers and attitudinal/evaluative barriers to initiation and continuation of treatment. RESULTS: Low perceived need was reported by 44.8% of respondents with a disorder who did not seek treatment. Desire to handle the problem on one's own was the most common reason among respondents with perceived need both for not seeking treatment (72.6%) and for dropping out of treatment (42.2%). Attitudinal/evaluative factors were much more important than structural barriers both to initiating (97.4% v. 22.2%) and to continuing (81.9% v. 31.8%) of treatment. Reasons for not seeking treatment varied with illness severity. Low perceived need was a more common reason for not seeking treatment among individuals with mild (57.0%) than moderate (39.3%) or severe (25.9%) disorders, whereas structural and attitudinal/evaluative barriers were more common among respondents with more severe conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Low perceived need and attitudinal/evaluative barriers are the major barriers to treatment seeking and staying in treatment among individuals with common mental disorders. Efforts to increase treatment seeking and reduce treatment drop-out need to take these barriers into consideration as well as to recognize that barriers differ as a function of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cooperação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Mol Psychiatry ; 14(7): 728-37, 2009 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18283278

RESUMO

This study presents national data on the comparative role impairments of common mental and chronic medical disorders in the general population. These data come from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication, a nationally representative household survey. Disorder-specific role impairment was assessed with the Sheehan Disability Scales, a multidimensional instrument that asked respondents to attribute impairment to particular conditions. Overall impairment was significantly higher for mental than chronic medical disorders in 74% of pair-wise comparisons between the two groups of conditions, and severe impairment was reported by a significantly higher portion of persons with mental disorders (42.0%) than chronic medical disorders (24.4%). However, treatment was provided for a significantly lower proportion of mental (21.4%) than chronic medical (58.2%) disorders. Although mental disorders were associated with comparable or higher impairment than chronic medical conditions in all domains of function, they showed different patterns of deficits; whereas chronic medical disorders were most likely to be associated with impairment in domains of work and home functioning, mental disorders were most commonly associated with problems in social and close-relation domains. Comorbidity between chronic medical and mental disorders significantly increased the reported impairment associated with each type of disorder. The results indicate a serious mismatch between a high degree of impairment and a low rate of treatment for mental disorders in the United States. Efforts to reduce disability will need to address the disproportionate burden and distinct patterns of deficits of mental disorders and the potentially synergistic impact of comorbid mental and chronic medical disorders.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Avaliação da Deficiência , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Prevalência , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
5.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 58(9): 861-8, 2001 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11545670

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This randomized trial evaluated an integrated model of primary medical care for a cohort of patients with serious mental disorders. METHODS: A total of 120 individuals enrolled in a Veterans Affairs (VA) mental health clinic were randomized to receive primary medical care through an integrated care initiative located in the mental health clinic (n = 59) or through the VA general medicine clinic (n = 61). Veterans who obtained care in the integrated care clinic received on-site primary care and case management that emphasized preventive medical care, patient education, and close collaboration with mental health providers to improve access to and continuity of care. Analyses compared health process (use of medical services, quality of care, and satisfaction) and outcomes (health and mental health status and costs) between the groups in the year after randomization. RESULTS: Patients treated in the integrated care clinic were significantly more likely to have made a primary care visit and had a greater mean number of primary care visits than those in the usual care group. They were more likely to have received 15 of the 17 preventive measures outlined in clinical practice guidelines. Patients assigned to the integrated care clinic had a significantly greater improvement in health as measured by the physical component summary score of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey than patients assigned to the general medicine clinic (4.7 points vs -0.3 points, P<.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in any of the measures of mental health symptoms or in total health care costs. CONCLUSION: On-site, integrated primary care was associated with improved quality and outcomes of medical care.


Assuntos
Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Feminino , Seguimentos , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/diagnóstico , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Satisfação do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/normas , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 58(6): 565-72, 2001 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11386985

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether differences in quality of medical care might explain a portion of the excess mortality associated with mental disorders in the year after myocardial infarction. METHODS: This study examined a national cohort of 88 241 Medicare patients 65 years and older who were hospitalized for clinically confirmed acute myocardial infarction. Proportional hazard models compared the association between mental disorders and mortality before and after adjusting 5 established quality indicators: reperfusion, aspirin, beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and smoking cessation counseling. All models adjusted for eligibility for each procedure, demographic characteristics, cardiac risk factors and history, admission characteristics, left ventricular function, hospital characteristics, and regional factors. RESULTS: After adjusting for the potential confounding factors, presence of any mental disorder was associated with a 19% increase in 1-year risk of mortality (hazard ratios [HR], 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.36). After adding the 5 quality measures to the model, the association was no longer significant (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.96-1.26). Similarly, while schizophrenia (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.67) and major affective disorders (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.20) were each initially associated with increased mortality, after adding the quality variables, neither schizophrenia (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.86-1.60) nor major affective disorder (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.87-1.23) remained a significant predictor. CONCLUSIONS: Deficits in quality of medical care seemed to explain a substantial portion of the excess mortality experienced by patients with mental disorders after myocardial infarction. The study suggests the potential importance of improving these patients' medical care as a step toward reducing their excess mortality.


Assuntos
Hospitalização , Transtornos Mentais/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Análise por Conglomerados , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Reperfusão Miocárdica , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Fatores de Risco , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar , Função Ventricular Esquerda
7.
Am J Psychiatry ; 158(5): 731-4, 2001 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11329394

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The relationship of depressive symptoms, satisfaction with health care, and 2-year work outcomes was examined in a national cohort of employees. METHOD: A total of 6,239 employees of three corporations completed surveys on health and satisfaction with health care in 1993 and 1995. This study used bivariate and multivariate analyses to examine the relationships of depressive symptoms (a score below 43 on the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey mental component summary), satisfaction with a variety of dimensions of health care in 1993, and work outcomes (sick days and decreased effectiveness in the workplace) in 1995. RESULTS: The odds of missed work due to health problems in 1995 were twice as high for employees with depressive symptoms in both 1993 and 1995 as for those without depressive symptoms in either year. The odds of decreased effectiveness at work in 1995 was seven times as high. Among individuals with depressive symptoms in 1993, a report of one or more problems with clinical care in 1993 predicted a 34% increase in the odds of persistent depressive symptoms and a 66% increased odds of decreased effectiveness at work in 1995. There was a weaker association between problems with plan administration and outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Depressive disorders in the workplace persist over time and have a major effect on work performance, most notably on "presenteeism," or reduced effectiveness in the workplace. The study's findings suggest a potentially important link between consumers' perceptions of clinical care and work outcomes in this population.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde/normas , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Eficiência , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/normas , Satisfação Pessoal , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Carga de Trabalho , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/psicologia , Feminino , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/estatística & dados numéricos , Nível de Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas , Estados Unidos , Trabalho/normas
8.
Am J Epidemiol ; 153(3): 299-306, 2001 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11157418

RESUMO

Few studies have addressed the accuracy of self-reported cancer history, although epidemiologic studies routinely use self-reported information as the sole source of exposure or outcome data or as a criterion for exclusion from study participation. In this paper, false-negative reporting of cancer history is examined in a community-based sample by comparing interview data with tumor registry records. Subjects were participants in the 1980 New Haven Epidemiologic Catchment Area study; in 1995, cancer records (from 1935 onward) were obtained by linking the sample to the Connecticut Tumor Registry. Analyses focused on 263 individuals who had at least one tumor reported to the Connecticut Tumor Registry prior to participation in the Epidemiologic Catchment Area study. The overall rate of false-negative reporting was 39.2%. Logistic regression analysis revealed that false-negative reporting was significantly associated with non-White race, older age, increased time since cancer diagnosis, number of previous tumors, and type of cancer treatment received. In addition, false-negative reporting varied widely by cancer site, ranging from 0% for melanoma skin cancer to 83.3% for central nervous system cancers. The false-negative rate for breast cancer was 20.8%, that for colon and prostate cancers was 42.1%, and that for bladder cancer was 61.5%. Implications of these findings for prevalence estimation and future epidemiologic studies are discussed.


Assuntos
Prontuários Médicos/normas , Neoplasias/epidemiologia , Sistema de Registros/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Connecticut/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Distribuição por Sexo
9.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 20(6): 233-41, 2001.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11816664

RESUMO

Using a nationally representative sample of 23,230 U.S. residents, we examine patterns of economic burden across five chronic conditions: mood disorders, diabetes, heart disease, asthma, and hypertension. Almost half of U.S. health care costs in 1996 were borne by persons with one or more of these five conditions; of that spending amount, only about one-quarter was spent on treating the conditions themselves and the remainder on coexistent illnesses. Each condition demonstrated substantial economic burden but also unique characteristics and patterns of service use driving those costs. The findings highlight the differing challenges involved in understanding needs and improving care across particular chronic conditions.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/economia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Gastos em Saúde , Absenteísmo , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Asma/economia , Asma/epidemiologia , Doença Crônica/classificação , Doença Crônica/epidemiologia , Coleta de Dados , Diabetes Mellitus/economia , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiologia , Política de Saúde , Cardiopatias/economia , Cardiopatias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/economia , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos do Humor/economia , Transtornos do Humor/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
10.
Am J Psychiatry ; 157(9): 1485-91, 2000 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10964866

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study characterized the prevalence, characteristics, and impact of mental and general medical disabilities in the United States. METHOD: The 1994-1995 National Health Interview Survey of Disability was the largest disability survey ever conducted in the United States. A national sample was screened for disability, defined as limitation or inability to participate in a major life activity. Analyses compared cohorts who attributed their disability to physical, mental, or combined conditions. RESULTS: Of 106,573 adults, 1.1% reported functional disability from mental conditions, 4.8% from general medical conditions, and 1.2% from combined mental and general medical conditions. Disabilities attributed to a mental condition were predominantly associated with social and cognitive difficulties, those attributed to general medical conditions with physical limitations, and combined disabilities with deficits spanning multiple domains. In multivariate models, comorbid medical and mental conditions were associated with a twofold increase in odds of unemployment and a two-thirds increase in odds of support on disability payments compared to respondents with a single form of disability. More than half the nonworking disabled reported that economic, social, and job-based barriers contributed to their inability to work. One-fourth of working disabled people reported discrimination on the basis of their disability during the past 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: An estimated three million Americans (one-third of disabled people) reported that a mental condition contributes to their disability. Mental, general medical, and combined conditions are associated with unique patterns of functional impairment. Social and economic factors and job discrimination may exacerbate the functional impairments resulting from clinical syndromes.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Comorbidade , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Escolaridade , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Preconceito , Prevalência , Política Pública , Previdência Social/economia , Seguridade Social/economia , Estereotipagem , Inquéritos e Questionários , Desemprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
Arch Gen Psychiatry ; 57(7): 708-14, 2000 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10891042

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, this study provides the first national estimates for use of practitioner-based complementary treatments by US residents reporting mental conditions. METHODS: A total of 16038 respondents to the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey were asked about visits for 12 complementary medical services (eg, chiropractic services and herbal remedies). Bivariate and multiple regression models examined use of these therapies in individuals reporting a mental condition (n= 1803), fair or poor mental health status (n=992), and 1 of 4 chronic medical conditions (n = 3262) and in the remainder of the sample (n= 10 793). RESULTS: A total of 9.8% of those reporting a mental condition made a complementary visit, and about half of these (4.5%) made a visit to treat the mental condition. Persons reporting transient stress or adjustment disorders were most likely (odds ratio, 9.1%; 95% confidence interval, 5.5%-12.7%), and those with psychotic (odds ratio, 1.5%; 95% confidence interval, 0.0%-4.2%) and affective (odds ratio, 2.6%; 95% confidence interval, 1.5%-3.8%) conditions least likely, to use complementary therapies to treat their mental condition. In multivariate models controlling for medical comorbidity, fair or poor mental health status, and demographic factors, report of a mental condition predicted a 1.27-fold increase in the odds of a complementary visit (95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.54). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported mental conditions were associated with increased use of complementary treatments, although use of these treatments was concentrated in respondents with transient distress rather than chronic and serious conditions. More research using structured diagnostic interviews is needed to examine the prevalence, patterns, and clinical implications of use of these treatments by individuals with mental conditions in "real world" community settings.


Assuntos
Terapias Complementares/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Adulto , Terapias Complementares/economia , Feminino , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Probabilidade , Análise de Regressão , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
12.
Am J Psychiatry ; 157(8): 1274-8, 2000 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10910790

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Employers are playing an increasingly influential role in determining the scope and character of health coverage in the United States. This study compares the health and disability costs of depressive illness with those of four other chronic conditions among employees of a large U.S. corporation. METHOD: Data from the health and employee files of 15,153 employees of a major U.S. corporation who filed health claims in 1995 were examined. Analyses compared the mental health costs, medical costs, sick days, and total health and disability costs associated with depression and four other conditions: heart disease, diabetes, hypertension, and back problems. Regression models were used to control for demographic differences and job characteristics. RESULTS: Employees treated for depression incurred annual per capita health and disability costs of $5,415, significantly more than the cost for hypertension and comparable to the cost for the three other medical conditions. Employees with depressive illness plus any of the other conditions cost 1.7 times more than those with the comparison medical conditions alone. Depressive illness was associated with a mean of 9.86 annual sick days, significantly more than any of the other conditions. Depressed employees under the age of 40 years took 3.5 more annual sick days than those 40 years old or older. CONCLUSIONS: The cost of depression to employers, particularly the cost in lost work days, is as great or greater than the cost of many other common medical illnesses, and the combination of depressive and other common illnesses is particularly costly. The strong association between depressive illness and sick days in younger workers suggests that the impact of depression may increase as these workers age.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Transtorno Depressivo/economia , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Absenteísmo , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Dor nas Costas/economia , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus/economia , Feminino , Planos de Assistência de Saúde para Empregados/estatística & dados numéricos , Cardiopatias/economia , Humanos , Hipertensão/economia , Seguro por Deficiência/economia , Seguro por Deficiência/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Licença Médica/economia , Licença Médica/estatística & dados numéricos
13.
Psychiatr Serv ; 51(7): 890-2, 2000 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10875953

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological surveys suggest that half of mental disorders in the community are treated in general medical settings. This paper examines delivery of mental health services in psychiatric, primary care, and specialty medical clinics in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), the largest integrated public-sector health care system in the United States. METHODS: The study examined all outpatient visits to VA clinics between October 1996 and March 1998, a time during which VA policy promoted a shift to a primary care model. For veterans with a primary diagnosis of a mental or substance use disorder who made any visit to a VA psychiatric, primary care, or specialty medical clinic, we compared the locus of care and case mix as well as changes in treatment patterns during the study period. RESULTS: Of 437,035 veterans treated for a mental disorder during the final six months of the study period, only 7 percent were seen for their mental disorders exclusively in primary care and specialty medical clinics. Compared with veterans with mental disorders treated in specialty mental health clinics, those treated in medical clinics had less serious psychiatric diagnoses and made fewer visits. While there was a substantial shift of care from specialty to primary care during the study period, no comparable change in the distribution of care between medical and mental health settings was found. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment patterns in VA clinics differ markedly from those in the private sector. Research is needed to determine whether and how staffing models developed in HMOs and community samples should be extended to these public-sector settings.


Assuntos
Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviços Comunitários de Saúde Mental/estatística & dados numéricos , Prestação Integrada de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Medicina de Família e Comunidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Especialização , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
14.
Arch Intern Med ; 160(10): 1522-6, 2000 May 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10826468

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study examines the association between the presence of a general medical illness and suicidality in a representative sample of US young adults. METHODS: Between 1988 and 1994, 7589 individuals aged 17 to 39 years were administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule as part of a national probability survey. The survey collected information about lifetime suicidal ideation and suicide attempts, a checklist of common general medical conditions, and data on major depression, alcohol use, and demographic characteristics. RESULTS: Whereas 16.3% of respondents described suicidal ideation at some point in their lives, 25.2% of individuals with a general medical condition, and 35.0% of those with 2 or more medical illnesses reported life-time suicidal ideation. Similarly, whereas 5.5% of respondents had made a suicide attempt, 8.9% of those with a general medical illness and 16.2% of those with 2 or more medical conditions had attempted suicide. In models controlling for major depression, depressive symptoms, alcohol use, and demographic characteristics, presence of a general medical condition predicted a 1.3 times increase in likelihood of suicidal ideation; more specifically, pulmonary diseases (asthma, bronchitis) were associated with a two-thirds increase in the odds of lifetime suicidal ideation. Cancer and asthma were each associated with a more than 4-fold increase in the likelihood of a suicide attempt. CONCLUSIONS: A significant association was found between medical conditions and suicidality that persisted after adjusting for depressive illness and alcohol use. The findings support the need to screen for suicidality in general medical settings, over and above use of general depression instruments.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/psicologia , Tentativa de Suicídio/psicologia , Suicídio/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Funções Verossimilhança , Masculino , Determinação da Personalidade , Risco , Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
15.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 61(3): 234-7; quiz 238-9, 2000 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10817113

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have reported disturbingly low rates of treatment for major depression in the United States. To better understand this phenomenon, we studied the prevalence and predictors of antidepressant treatment in a national sample of individuals with major depression. METHOD: Between 1988 and 1994, 7589 individuals, aged 17-39 years and drawn from a national probability sample, were administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Interviewers asked about prescription drug use and checked medication bottles to record the name and type of medications. RESULTS: A total of 312 individuals, or 4.1% of the sample, met DSM-III criteria for current major depression. Only 7.4% of those with current major depression were being treated with an antidepressant. Among individuals with current major depression, being insured and having a primary care provider each predicted a 4-fold increase in odds of antidepressant treatment; telling the primary provider about depressive symptoms predicted a 10-fold increase in treatment. CONCLUSION: The study's findings support the notion that a serious gap exists between the established efficacy of antidepressant medications and rates of treatment for major depression in the "real world." Underreporting of depressive symptoms to providers and problems with access to general medical care appear to be 2 major contributors to this problem.


Assuntos
Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Antidepressivos/administração & dosagem , Transtorno Depressivo/diagnóstico , Transtorno Depressivo/epidemiologia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Uso de Medicamentos , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Seguro Saúde , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Prevalência , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica/estatística & dados numéricos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Sexuais , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
17.
JAMA ; 283(4): 506-11, 2000 Jan 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10659877

RESUMO

CONTEXT: A number of studies have found race- and sex-based differences in rates of cardiovascular procedures in the United States. Similarly, mental disorders might be expected to be associated with lower rates of such procedures on the basis of clinical, socioeconomic, patient, and provider factors. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether having a comorbid mental disorder is associated with a lower likelihood of cardiac catheterization and/or revascularization after acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data from medical charts and administrative files as part of the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project. SETTING: Acute care nongovernmental hospitals in the United States. PATIENTS: National cohort of 113653 eligible patients 65 years or older who were hospitalized for confirmed acute myocardial infarction between February 1994 and July 1995. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Likelihood of cardiac catheterization, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery during the index hospitalization, comparing patients with and without mental disorders (classified as schizophrenia, major affective disorder, substance abuse/dependence disorder, or other mental disorder). RESULTS: Compared with the remainder of the sample, patients with any comorbid mental disorder (n = 5365; 4.7%) were significantly less likely to undergo PTCA (11.8% vs 16.8%; P<.001) or CABG (8.2% vs 12.6%; P<.001). After adjusting for demographic, clinical, hospital, and regional factors, individuals with mental disorders were 41% (for schizophrenia) to 78% (for substance use) as likely to undergo cardiac catheterization as those without mental disorders (P<.001 for all). Among those undergoing catheterization, rates of PTCA or CABG for patients with mental disorders were not significantly different from rates for patients without mental disorders (for those with any mental disorder, P = .12 for PTCA and P = .06 for CABG). In multivariate models, the 30-day mortality did not differ between patients with and without mental disorders. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, individuals with comorbid mental disorders were substantially less likely to undergo coronary revascularization procedures than those without mental disorders. Further research is needed to understand the degree to which patient and provider factors contribute to this difference and its implications for quality and long-term outcomes of care.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/estatística & dados numéricos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análise Multivariada , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos
18.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 19(1): 203-9, 2000.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10645088

RESUMO

This DataWatch uses data from the 1993 Employee Health Care Value Survey (EHCVS) to compare the experiences of respondents with and without chronic illnesses under managed care. After controlling for potential confounders, we found that chronic illness was associated with increased odds of dissatisfaction in both independent practice association plans and prepaid group practices, but not under fee-for-service coverage. Chronic illness appeared to exacerbate difficulties and to attenuate the benefits experienced by healthy persons under managed care. We conclude that persons with chronic illnesses may be at particular risk under managed care; their experiences may warrant particular attention when health plan performance is being monitored.


Assuntos
Doença Crônica/psicologia , Programas de Assistência Gerenciada/normas , Satisfação do Paciente , Adulto , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Planos de Pagamento por Serviço Prestado/normas , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , New England , Razão de Chances , Fatores de Risco
20.
J Clin Psychiatry ; 60(10): 664-7, 1999 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10549682

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As admission criteria to inpatient units become more focused on patient safety and behavioral instability, primary treatment often requires use of medications that need to be quick, safe, and effective for control of agitation. This article reviews the evidence that droperidol may serve as the optimal medication for this task. DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive MEDLINE search of English-language literature was conducted using the search term droperidol concerning the use of droperidol in psychiatric emergencies. Cross-referencing of those articles was conducted to include pertinent articles in the non-psychiatric and European literature regarding safety and early development of the drug. STUDY FINDINGS: As evidenced in the animal and clinical literature, studies demonstrate the efficacy and rapidity of onset of droperidol and its relative safety compared with the most widely used antiagitation drug, haloperidol. Evidence for this use of droperidol is particularly compelling for situations in which intramuscular administration is necessary. CONCLUSION: Droperidol, while not in widespread use, may prove to be the superior typical neuroleptic for psychiatric emergencies. Increased clinical utilization and study of droperidol for this use is warranted.


Assuntos
Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Comportamento Perigoso , Droperidol/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Mentais/tratamento farmacológico , Agitação Psicomotora/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Aguda , Animais , Antipsicóticos/administração & dosagem , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Intervenção em Crise , Droperidol/administração & dosagem , Droperidol/efeitos adversos , Serviços de Emergência Psiquiátrica , Haloperidol/administração & dosagem , Haloperidol/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Ratos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...