RESUMO
PURPOSE: Some resources recommended Bouin solution for the fixation of testis biopsy specimens. We compared the histologic quality of rat testicular tissue using buffered formalin and Bouin solution as fixatives. METHODS: We prospectively compared the histologic quality of rat testicular tissue fixed in Bouin solution versus formalin. Testicular tissue was harvested post-mortem from six rats. Each testis was removed and sectioned in half; one half was fixed in formalin and one half in Bouin solution. Testicular tissue histology (nuclear membrane detail, nuclear granularity, cytoplasmic granularity, cytoplasmic membrane detail, and basement membrane detail) was graded as high quality (2) or low quality (1). Sloughing of cells into the lumens of the seminiferous tubules was graded on a 0-3 scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=extensive). RESULTS: All slides regardless of fixative were of appropriate quality for the histologic evaluation of spermatogenesis. The average sloughing score for formalin cases was 1.4 and for Bouin cases 1.6. Formalin fixed tissue was found to have high quality nuclear membrane detail (2), nuclear granularity (1.9), and basement membrane detail (2). Cytoplasmic granularity was of lesser but adequate quality (1.4). Cytoplasmic membrane detail was poor, (1). Tissue fixed with Bouin solution had high quality basement membrane detail (2) and adequate cytoplasmic granularity (1.5), nuclear membrane detail (1.3) and nuclear granularity (1.4). Cytoplasmic membrane detail was poor (1). CONCLUSION: Compared to Bouin solution, formalin fixation of rat testicular tissue produced adequate histology for the evaluation of spermatogenesis and may be superior to Bouin solution for certain cytologic features.
RESUMO
Presented is the first case of acute immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS)-associated cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in a patient on natalizumab for multiple sclerosis. The patient developed acute cerebral edema after initiation of amphotericin B. We propose several mechanisms that explain the acuity of IRIS in this specific patient population and suggest possible therapies.
RESUMO
Frozen section (FS) analysis is a powerful tool that can provide a rapid diagnosis, directing operative management. However, FSs can also be misused. We consider an FS to be "inappropriate" when it does not influence operative management or immediate patient care. Not only can inappropriate FSs compromise diagnostic material, they can impact turnaround time of other FSs. We evaluated the utilization of FSs at our institution and assessed influence on intraoperative management. Frozen sections performed at the University of Alabama at Birmingham Hospital in 2013 were stratified by surgical subspecialty. Operative, clinical, and pathology notes were reviewed to determine the rationale for sending each FS and to determine impact on intraoperative management. Cases lacking operative notes were excluded. A total of 4104 FSs were performed in 1896 cases. Surgical subspecialties included cardiothoracic, otolaryngology, breast, surgical oncology, gynecology, gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, urology, transplant, and orthopedics. 42.5% of FSs evaluated margin status, 34.8% confirmed or excluded malignancy, 9.5% were for tumor classification, 6.7% assessed adequacy for diagnosis, 1.9% were to confirm or exclude infection, 2.8% were for transplant, and 1.8% were for lymphoma workup. Twelve percent (491/4104) of FSs did not influence operative management. This was most common among cardiothoracic surgeries (34%). No inappropriate FSs were sent for any transplant surgeries. Otolaryngology used the most FSs and had less than 1% that were inappropriate. Most FSs influence operative management. The rationale for sending an FS and its influence on operative management was subspecialty dependent. Interdepartmental discussions of FS utilization might be helpful in the elimination of unnecessary FSs.
