Biomechanical analysis of the number of implants for the immediate sacroiliac joint fixation.

PURPOSE: The fusion of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is the last treatment option for chronic pain resulting from sacroiliitis. With the various implant systems available, there are different possible surgical strategies in terms of the type and number of implants and trajectories. The aim was to quantify the effect of the number of cylindrical threaded implants on SIJ stabilization. METHODS: Six cadaveric pelvises were embedded in resin simulating a double-leg stance. Compression loads were applied to the sacral plate. The pelvises were tested non-instrumented and instrumented progressively with up to three cylindrical threaded implants (12-mm diameter, 60-mm length) with a posterior oblique trajectory. Vertical (VD) and angular (AD) displacements of the SIJ were measured locally using high-precision cameras and digital image correlation. RESULTS: Compared to the non-instrumented initial state, instrumentation with one implant significantly decreased the VD (- 24% ± 15%, p = 0.028), while the AD decreased on average by - 9% (± 15%; p = 0.345). When compared to the one-implant configuration, adding a second implant further statistically decreased VD (- 10% ± 7%, p = 0.046) and AD (- 19% ± 15, p = 0.046). Adding a third implant did not lead to additional stabilization for VD nor AD (p > 0.5). CONCLUSION: Compared to the non-instrumented initial state, the two-implant configuration reduces both vertical and angular displacements the most, while minimizing the number of implants.

Instrumentation of the sacroiliac joint with cylindrical threaded implants: A detailed finite element study of patient characteristics affecting fixation performance.

The sacroiliac joint (SIJ) is a known pain generator that, in severe cases, may require surgical fixation to reduce intra-articular displacements and allow for arthrodesis. The objective of this computational study was to analyze how the number of implants affected SIJ stabilization with patient-specific characteristics such as the pelvic geometry and bone quality. Detailed finite element models were developed to account for three pelvises of differing anatomy. Each model was tested with a normal and low bone density (LD) under two types of loading: compression only and compression with flexion and extension moments. These models were instrumented with one to three cylindrical, threaded and fenestrated implants through a posterior oblique trajectory, requiring less muscle dissection than the more common lateral trajectory used with triangular implants. Compared with the noninstrumented pelvis, the change in range of motion (ROM) and stress distribution were used to characterize joint stabilization. Noninstrumented mobility ranged from 0.86 to 2.55 mm and from 1.37° to 6.11°. Across patient-specific characteristics, the ROM reduction with one implant varied from 3% to 21% for vertical and 15% to 47% for angular displacements. With two implants, the ROM reduction ranged from 12% to 41% for vertical and from 28% to 61% for angular displacements. Three implants, however, did not further improve the joint stability (14% to 42% for vertical and 32% to 63% for angular displacements). With respect to patient characteristics, an LD led to a decreased stabilization and a higher volume of stressed bone (>75% of yield stress). A better understanding of how patient characteristics affect the implant performance could help improve surgical planning of sacroiliac arthrodesis.

Biomechanical analysis of two insertion sites for the fixation of the sacroiliac joint via an oblique lateral approach.

BACKGROUND: The sacroiliac joint is an important source of low back pain. In severe cases, sacroiliac joint fusion is used to reduce pain, but revision rates can reach 30%. The lack of initial mechanical stability may lead to pseudarthrosis, thus not alleviating the patient's symptoms. This could be due to the damage induced to the interosseous ligament during implant insertion. Decoupling instrumentation steps (drilling-tapping and implant insertion) would allow verifying this hypothesis. Moreover, no biomechanical studies have been published on sacroiliac joint fixation with an oblique lateral approach, while it has important clinical advantages over the direct lateral approach. METHODS: Eight cadaveric human pelves with both ischia embedded were tested in three sequential states: intact, drilled-tapped and instrumented with one cylindrical threaded implant with an oblique lateral trajectory. Specimens were assigned one of two insertion sites (distal point; near the posterior superior iliac spine, and proximal point; anterosuperior to the distal point) and tested in compression and flexion-extension. Vertical and angular displacements of the sacroiliac joint were measured locally using digital image correlation methods. FINDINGS: In compression, instrumentation significantly reduced vertical displacements (17% (SD 22%), P = 0.04) but no difference was found for angular displacements or flexion-extension loads (P > 0.05). Drilling-tapping did not change the stability of the sacroiliac joint (P > 0.05); there was no statistical difference between the insertion sites (P > 0.05). INTERPRETATIONS: Insertion of one implant through either the distal or proximal insertion site with an oblique lateral approach significantly reduced vertical displacements of the sacroiliac joint in compression, a predominant load of this joint. RESEARCH ETHICS COMMITTEE: Polytechnique Montreal: CÉR-1617-30.

Sacroiliac joint morphologic changes from infancy to adulthood.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Report of sacroiliac morphology changes during growth is limited in the literature and the interest of such morphology and its consequence for surgery is increasing. PURPOSE: Aims of this work are (1) to anatomically define the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), and (2) to assess the influence of growth on the sacroiliac morphology and the pelvic parameters. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-nine young subjects from 6 months to 18 years old (y/o) and 20 adults aged from 18 to 50 y/o were selected from our institutional patient database. METHODS: They underwent a computed tomography (CT) examination on a 128-MDCT (GE Healthcare Optima CT660). Transverse CT image datasets were reconstructed, anonymized, and segmented with ITK-SNAP. Landmarks and surfaces were selected and a SIJ orientation analysis was performed using costumed Python scripts. RESULTS: The subjects were divided into four groups: infants (1.9±1 y/o), children (6.9±1.7 y/o), adolescents (13.7±1.8 y/o), and adults (27.3±5.6 y/o). Differences between SIJ orientation were found significant between young subject groups for synovial sacrum SIJ orientation (p<.001) and iliac total SIJ orientation (p=.036). Both orientations of younger subjects were found significantly different from the adult group (p<.035). SIJ synovial sacrum and iliac total orientations correlated significantly with age (p<.03). All orientations correlated with pelvic incidence (p<.04) except for synovial sacrum SIJ orientation (p=.2). No gender or symmetrical differences were found significant in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Morphologic definition of the SIJ confirmed the independency of the gender during growth. Such results will be beneficial for the analysis and management of vertebral pathology.