Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Transl Sci ; 10(5): 387-394, 2017 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28618191

RESUMO

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have become known for both their therapeutic effect and good safety profile. An application was submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration for approval of a reformulated PPI product that failed bioequivalence testing, but was submitted on the basis of the long history of PPI use as a "surrogate" for equivalence. This review evaluates the safety data for PPIs, discuss variability of pharmacokinetic parameters of PPIs in the reformulation setting, and potential implications of those changes for long-term safety.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/farmacocinética , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Aprovação de Drogas , Fraturas Ósseas/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Publicações , Equivalência Terapêutica , Fatores de Tempo
2.
Endoscopy ; 41(11): 971-8, 2009 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19866395

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Minimizing the invasiveness of operations by using natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) may reduce adhesion formation. The aim of the study was to compare rates of adhesion formation after peritoneoscopy with liver biopsy by laparotomy, laparoscopy, and transgastric NOTES. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Experimental comparative survival study, at a university hospital. using 18 female pigs weighing 35 - 40 kg. Peritoneoscopy with liver biopsy was randomized to one of three groups: laparotomy, laparoscopy, and transgastric NOTES. Preoperative, operative, and postoperative care was standardized. Main outcome measures were: (i) survival and complication rates; (ii) assessment of adhesion formation using the Hopkins Adhesion Formation Score at necropsy (day 14). RESULTS: 100 % of pigs with laparotomy and 33.3 % with laparoscopy had adhesions compared with 16.7 % who underwent transgastric NOTES. Documented adhesion bands totals for each group were: transgastric NOTES 1; laparoscopy 4; laparotomy 17. Median adhesion formation scores were: laparotomy 2.5 (range 2 - 4), compared with laparoscopy 0.0 (0 - 2), and transgastric NOTES 0.0 (0 - 1) ( P < 0.001). Spearman coefficient analysis revealed that correlation between adhesion scores assigned by two investigators was excellent (r = 0.99, P < 0.001, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.9978 - 0.9996). CONCLUSIONS: Although this was a short-term study, with a low number of animals, it showed that transgastric NOTES and laparoscopy are associated with statistically significantly lower rates of adhesion formation than open surgery when peritoneoscopy with liver biopsy is performed. Incidence and severity of adhesions were lowest with transgastric NOTES.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparotomia/efeitos adversos , Fígado/cirurgia , Cavidade Peritoneal/cirurgia , Aderências Teciduais/etiologia , Animais , Biópsia , Feminino , Suínos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...