[Cerebrospinal fluid shunting: anesthetic particularities]. / Les dérivations du liquide céphalorachidien: particularités anesthésiques.

The symptomatic treatment of hydrocephalus remains cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drainage to an external reservoir (external CSF drainage) or to an internal cavity mainly the peritoneum or the right atrium via a unidirectional valve (internal CSF drainage) and finally by endoscopic ventriculocisternostomy. Local anaesthesia is adequate for external CSF drainage in adults and children above 10 years while general anaesthesia is required in all other cases. The main problems encountered in these patients are difficult intubation and full stomach associated with increased intracranial pressure. The anaesthetic approach should favour homeostasis. With the exception of ketamine and enflurane, the majority of anaesthetic drugs can be used. Anti-epileptic drug are mandatory. Antibioprophylaxis mainly against staphylococcus is systematic in internal CSF drainage. Rapid emergence from anaesthesia and extubation should be encouraged. Complications (infectious, mechanical and bleeding kinds) are frequent and are often the cause of reinterventions or revisions of the device, exposing the patients to iterative anaesthesia. Furthermore, patients with shunts are at risk of malfunction of the device when exposed to situations like pregnancy, magnetic resonance imaging, or laparoscopy. Under these circumstances, it is recommended to associate the neurosurgical team in the management of these patients and to verify that the shunt is working well before and after the procedure or event.

[Practice and complications of spinal anesthesia in African tropical countries]. / Pratique et complications de la rachianesthésie en milieu tropical africain.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the risk of the practice of spinal anaesthesia (SA) in African tropics. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study in multiple centres over a two years period. PERSONS: Twenty-one anaesthesiologists and anaesthetist nurses covering ten African countries. METHODS: Two anonymous questionnaires; the first, filled in each anaesthetic problem occurred, to define the type of incident or accident, and its circumstances; the second was designed to define the position occupied, to quantify the global anaesthetic activity, the number of SA, and to value the number of complications or deaths linked to SA. RESULTS: Six anaesthesiologists and one anaesthetist nurse replied to the study, covering six sites in five different countries (Senegal, Chad, Central African Republic, Niger and Madagascar). On the 18,432 anaesthetic acts collected, 2,703 (14.7%) were SA. In the well-equipped centres, general anaesthesia was predominant with a frequency of over 75%. However in the not so well equipped centres or those which supplies were more problematical, SA technique was used with a frequency varying from 48.9 to 68.7%. Forty incidents and accidents were reported (1.5%), five led to the death of the patient (0.2%). Among the seven cardiac arrests (0.3%), four were fatal (0.1%). Eight of the ten accidents and all of the deaths occurred in the least equipped centres. Eight of ten accidents happened during emergency caesarean sections. All cardiac arrests were preceded by a severe hypovolemia. For the four deaths after cardiac arrest, an anaesthetist nurse with isobaric bupivacaine 0.5% carried out SA. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the practice of SA in African tropics was performing in different practice conditions and people qualification than they were in France. The frequency of cardiac arrests and deaths was respectively five and 20 times more important, in those conditions. The first conclusion that can be drawn from this study is that it is questionable to use SA for emergency Caesarean section under hypovolemic condition. The second is the necessity for specific training on the local anaesthesia for anaesthetist nurses but also training to choose the anaesthesia best adapted to the surgery, the condition of the patient and the means available.