[Clinical and radiologic outcome of humeral implants in shoulder arthroplasty]. / Devenir clinique et radiologique des implants huméraux des arthroplasties d'épaule.

The clinical and radiological evolution of the glenoid socket in total shoulder arthroplasty is well documented, whereas evaluation of the humeral component has received much less attention. The outcome of 40 humeral replacements performed in 39 patients was studied with a minimum follow-up of one year. There were 26 Neer prostheses, 9 Modular Shoulder prostheses and 5 Aequalis prostheses. Twenty-nine prostheses were implanted with cement and 11 were cementless. The clinical and radiological results were assessed according to the scoring system used for the 1994 symposium of SO.F.C.O.T. X rays in the coronal plane were used to assess the position of the stem, radiolucencies around the humeral component and the percentage of the cross-section of the diaphysis filled by the humeral stem. The average follow-up period was respectively 55.6 months for the Neer prostheses, 17.9 months for the Modular Shoulder prostheses and 12.4 months for the Aequalis prostheses. Radiolucent lines were noted in 20 cases, all with uncemented humeral components. Two prostheses were loose; however, none required revision. The underlying pathology, surgical approach, position of the humeral component, implant design or association with glenoid resurfacing were not correlated with the presence of radiolucent lines or with a loose implant. Cementless fixation was the only parameter statistically related with the presence of radiolucent lines. This report confirms the good results obtained with cemented humeral prostheses. Radiological evaluation of the smooth cementless humeral implant showed many progressive radiolucent lines, without clinical expression. The authors analyze the various studies in the literature and discuss the interest of cementless implants with ingrowth surface.

[Is calcaneal osteotomy justified in Haglund's disease?]. / L'Ostéotomie calcanéenne est-elle justifiée dans la maladie de Haglund?

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The authors report their experience of Zadek's wedge osteotomy in the treatment of posterior talalgia in adults and evaluate the various radiographical measurements for calcaneus deformity measurement.... MATERIAL: This procedure was performed in 27 patients with a total of 36 calcanea treated between 1985 and 1996. The sex ratio was 20 women for 7 men with an average age of 27 years. Prior to this osteotomy nine feet were operated by resection of the postero-superior tuberosity with recurrence of pain and disability, and two patients presented an inflammatory arthritis. METHOD: For the surgical procedure, the patient was placed in lateral position. Skin incision was five to six centimeters long, curvilinear along the lateral side of the tendo achillis. Two dorsal pins were inserted, creating a triangle so that the apex pointed plantarly and the base dorsally. The sagittal saw was then used to create a wedge osteotomy with a dorsal base of seven to ten millimeters. A screw was then driven across the osteotomy site for ultimate fixation. RESULTS: Eighty per cent (29 osteotomies) of patients had been examined clinically and radiologically with a mean follow-up of 29 months. Considering pain, daily activity and discomfort with footwear, results were excellent in 12 cases, good in 10, fair in 5 and poor in two cases. No radiological criteria used for the diagnosis of Haglund's disease were absolutely reliable. The "total angle" of Ruch, the "c.l angle" of Chauveaux and the "parallel pitch lines" of Heneghan reflect the amount of deformation most accurately, but especially, the calcaneal inclination angle was always increased (16 cases between 18 degrees and 30 degrees, 6 cases > 30 degrees). All patients had a weight-bearing calcaneal talus, either alone or in the context of posterior pes cavus. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the responsibility of rearfoot morphostatic disorders in posterior talalgia and the goods results obtained by Zadek osteotomy.

[Temporary antibiotic-loaded cemented prosthesis for two-stage septic hip arthroplasty]. / Prothèse temporaire en ciment imprégné d'antibiotiques au cours des arthroplasties en deux temps sur hanche infectée.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: During the excision period of a two-stage revision arthroplasty, the hip has a low function and an unacceptable leg length discrepancy. The goal of this study was to expose technical details in order to perform a simple articulated cement spacer which could be implanted during this period to improve hip function, to authorize partial weight bearing and to avoid leg length discrepancy. MATERIAL: This method was applied in three two-stage procedures justified because of particular immunodeficiency conditions: a 43 years old man who had bone marrow allograft and immunosuppressive therapy because of leukemia suffering of subacute septic hip arthritis; a 58 years old man suffering of diabetes and active C-hepatitis who had a septic loosening of a total hip arthroplasty (THA); a 76 years old woman suffering of diabetes who had a third septic loosening of THA. METHOD: The prosthesis was made of antibiotic-impregnated cement according to organisms antibiotic resistance. The prosthetic junction between head and diaphysis was reinforced with a tibial plate. Prosthetic shape was identical to the one of femoral broaches inserted in the femur after prosthetic and cement removal. The broach size was chosen when mechanical stability in the femur was obtained, and avoided leg length discrepancy after trials with cups. The tibial plate was bent in order to reinforce the junction with regard to the shape of the determined broach. Two doses of antibiotic-impregnated cement were mixed and molded with hands, then the plate was incorporated at the appropriate location, finally the broach was applied on this composite and cement in excess was removed before polymerisation. For prosthetic head, two options were available: to mold the cephalic zone of the cement at the patient acetabulum diameter with a soft aluminium cup previously molded in the acetabulum; to mold the cement cephalic zone with a trial cup in order to obtain a 22 or 28 ball. For this last option, a third dose of antibiotic-impregnated cement was prepared and placed in the acetabulum, a trial femoral head was applied in it to mold the location for the 22 or 28 prosthetic head. Before insertion, a collar was applied on the stem to prevent migration. Active mobilization was encouraged, and partial weight-bearing authorized. RESULTS: The mean range of hip flexion during period was 60 degrees. The patients were discharged approximatively 12 days after the first stage. Two patients had effective painless partial weight-bearing. The second stage was performed six weeks later on the average. The second procedure was easier than the second stage of a conventional two-stage procedure because of: easy and low hemorrhagic dissection authorized by the prosthesis; low difficulties with soft tissue tension as the prosthesis prevents leg length discrepancy; preservation of the articular space which prevents soft tissue sacrifice during the second stage. CONCLUSION: This simple technique is effective to prevent complications related to the excision period of a two-stage hip revision arthroplasty. Likewise, the economical aspect (short delay of hospitalisation, quick functional recovery) should be considered when compared with the excision period of a conventional two-stage procedure.