Phase II study of stereotactic body radiotherapy to primary tumor and metastatic locations in oligometastatic nonsmall-cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a treatment modality in patients presenting with oligometastatic nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). SBRT is used as a local consolidative treatment to metastatic disease sites. The majority of patients included in SBRT trials for oligometastatic NSCLC have controlled primary tumors and brain metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Oligometastatic NSCLC patients with ≤5 metastatic lesions were included in a prospective phase II trial to evaluate efficacy and toxicity of SBRT to all disease sites, primary tumor and metastatic locations. SBRT to a dose of 50 Gy in 10 fractions was delivered. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) was carried out at baseline and 3 months after SBRT to evaluate the metabolic response rate according to PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST). The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method from start of chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Side-effects were scored using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 3.0. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received SBRT after induction chemotherapy (n = 17) or as a primary treatment (n = 9). Median follow-up was 16.4 months. Overall metabolic response rate was 60% with seven patients (30%) achieving a complete metabolic remission and 7 (30%) a partial metabolic response. Any acute grade 2 toxicity was observed in four patients (15%) and grade 3 pulmonary toxicity in two patients (8%). Median PFS and OS were 11.2 and 23 months. The 1-year PFS and 1-year OS rate were 45% and 67%, respectively. CONCLUSION: SBRT to all disease sites, primary tumor and metastatic locations, in oligometastatic NSCLC patients produced an acceptable median PFS of 11.2 months.

Phase II study of helical tomotherapy for oligometastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of helical tomotherapy in the treatment of oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who were not amenable for metastasectomy and/or (further) systemic treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CRC patients with five or less metastases were enrolled. No limitations concerning dimension or localization of the metastases were imposed. Patients were treated with intensity-modulated and image-guided radiotherapy using helical tomotherapy, delivering a total dose of 40 Gy in fractions of 4 Gy. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) was carried out at baseline and 3 months after the initiation of radiotherapy to evaluate the metabolic response rate according to PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) version 1.0. Side-effects were scored using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTC AE) version 3.0. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were enrolled. A total of 52 metastases were treated. One patient (4%) experienced grade 3 vomiting; two patients (9%) grade 2 diarrhea and dysphagia, respectively. Twenty-two patients were evaluated by post-treatment PET-CT. Five (23%) and seven patients (32%) achieved a complete and partial metabolic response, respectively, resulting in an overall metabolic response rate of 55%. The actuarial 1-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 54%, 25% and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of helical tomotherapy in oligometastatic CRC patients resulted in a promising metabolic response rate of 55%.

Gating and tracking, 4D in thoracic tumours.

The limited ability to control for a tumour's location compromises the accuracy with which radiation can be delivered to tumour-bearing tissue. The resultant requirement for larger treatment volumes to accommodate target uncertainty restricts the radiation dose because more surrounding normal tissue is exposed. With image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT), these volumes can be optimized and tumouricidal doses may be delivered, achieving maximum tumour control with minimal complications. Moreover, with the ability of high precision dose delivery and real-time knowledge of the target volume location, IGRT has initiated the exploration of new indications in radiotherapy such as hypofractionated radiotherapy (or stereotactic body radiotherapy), deliberate inhomogeneous dose distributions coping with tumour heterogeneity (dose painting by numbers and biologically conformal radiation therapy), and adaptive radiotherapy. In short: "individualized radiotherapy". Tumour motion management, especially for thoracic tumours, is a particular problem in this context both for the delineation of tumours and organs at risk as well as during the actual treatment delivery. The latter will be covered in this paper with some examples based on the experience of the UZ Brussel. With the introduction of the NOVALIS system (BrainLAB, Feldkirchen, Germany) in 2000 and consecutive prototypes of the ExacTrac IGRT system, gradually a hypofractionation treatment protocol was introduced for the treatment of lung tumours and liver metastases evolving from motion-encompassing techniques towards respiratory-gated radiation therapy with audio-visual feedback and most recently dynamic tracking using the VERO system (BrainLAB, Feldkirchen, Germany). This evolution will be used to illustrate the recent developments in this particular field of research.

An overview of volumetric imaging technologies and their quality assurance for IGRT.

Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) aims at frequent imaging in the treatment room during a course of radiotherapy, with decisions made on the basis of this information. The concept is not new, but recent developments and clinical implementations of IGRT drastically improved the quality of radiotherapy and broadened its possibilities as well as its indications. In general IGRT solutions can be classified in planar imaging, volumetric imaging using ionising radiation (kV- and MV- based CT) or non-radiographic techniques. This review will focus on volumetric imaging techniques applying ionising radiation with some comments on Quality Assurance (QA) specific for clinical implementation. By far the most important advantage of volumetric IGRT solutions is the ability to visualize soft tissue prior to treatment and defining the spatial relationship between target and organs at risk. A major challenge is imaging during treatment delivery. As some of these IGRT systems consist of peripheral equipment and others present fully integrated solutions, the QA requirements will differ considerably. It should be noted for instance that some systems correct for mechanical instabilities in the image reconstruction process whereas others aim at optimal mechanical stability, and the coincidence of imaging and treatment isocentre needs special attention. Some of the solutions that will be covered in detail are: (a) A dedicated CT-scanner inside the treatment room. (b) Peripheral systems mounted to the gantry of the treatment machine to acquire cone beam volumetric CT data (CBCT). Both kV-based solutions and MV-based solutions using EPIDs will be covered. (c) Integrated systems designed for both IGRT and treatment delivery. This overview will explain some of the technical features and clinical implementations of these technologies as well as providing an insight in the limitations and QA procedures required for each specific solution.

Cauda equina syndrome in ankylosing spondylitis. Anatomical, diagnostic, and therapeutic considerations.

This article describes a case of cauda equina syndrome associated with ankylosing spondylitis, and reviews 28 additional cases in the literature. The neurological symptoms appear late in the evolution of spondylitis, when it is at an inactive stage. The diagnosis is easily confirmed by myelography, with watersoluble contrast and performed in a supine position, and by computerized tomography (CT) scan of the lumbar spine. The typical features are dilated lumbar sac with multiple dorsal diverticula. The pathogenesis of this entity remains the subject of speculation. Arachnoiditis with subsequent adhesions is the most likely explanation. No treatment has proved helpful so far. Surgery is not indicated.