Bacillus Calmette-Guérin is superior to a combination of epirubicin and interferon-alpha2b in the intravesical treatment of patients with stage T1 urinary bladder cancer. A prospective, randomized, Nordic study.

BACKGROUND: Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillation is regarded as the most effective bladder-sparing treatment for patients with high-grade T1 tumours and carcinoma in situ (CIS). The major problem with this therapy is the side-effects, making maintenance therapy difficult, even impossible, in a proportion of patients. Thus, alternative schedules and drugs have been proposed. OBJECTIVE: To compare BCG to the combination of epirubicin and interferon-alpha2b as adjuvant therapy of T1 tumours. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a Nordic multicenter, prospective, randomised trial in patients with primary T1 G2-G3 bladder cancer. Initial transurethral resection (TUR) was followed by a second-look resection. Patients were randomised to receive either regimen, given as induction for 6 wk followed by maintenance therapy for 2 yr. MEASUREMENTS: The drugs were compared with respect to time to recurrence and progression. Also, side-effects were documented. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 250 patients were randomised. At the primary end point, 62% were disease free in the combination arm as opposed to 73% in the BCG arm (p=0.065). At 24 mo, there was a significant difference in favour of the BCG-treated patients (p=0.012) regarding recurrence, although there was no difference regarding progression. The subgroup analysis showed that the superiority of BCG was mainly in those with concomitant CIS. In a multivariate analysis of association with recurrence/progression status, significant variables for outcome were type of drug, tumour size, multiplicity, status at second-look resection, and grade. A corresponding analysis was performed separately in the two treatment arms. Tumour size was the only significant variable for BCG-treated patients, while multiplicity, status at second-look resection, and grade were significant for patients treated with the combination. CONCLUSIONS: For prophylaxis of recurrence, BCG was more effective than the combination. There were no differences regarding progression and adverse events between the two treatments.

Results of second-look resection after primary resection of T1 tumour of the urinary bladder.

OBJECTIVE: To study residual tumours at second-look resection in patients resected 4-8 weeks earlier for T1 tumours of the urinary bladder. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All patients randomized in the ongoing Nordic T1G2-G3 Bladder Sparing Study with monitored data available were included in the study. Data on residual tumours at second-look resection were compared to basic patient and tumour characteristics. RESULTS: There were 72 patients (56%) without and 57 with residual exophytic tumours. In the former group, 20 patients (28%) had carcinoma in situ, compared to 19 (33%) in the latter group. Potentially dangerous tumours (either carcinoma in situ, T1 or Ta grade 3) were observed in 55 patients (43%). Multiple tumours at primary resection were more prone to residual tumour at second-look resection than single tumours. No other tumour or patient characteristics could predict the occurrence of a residual tumour. CONCLUSIONS: Residual tumours are frequently observed at second-look resection 4-8 weeks after primary resection of T1 tumours. The majority of residual tumours detected at this stage are potentially dangerous; therefore, early second-look resection followed by intravesical instillation therapy is mandatory in patients with T1 tumours of the urinary bladder.

Informed consent for clinical education--randomized study of two different strategies at a urology surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To study whether or not the provision of written information in advance might influence patients' inclination to participate in the clinical education of medical students at a urology surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 169 outpatients referred to the urological surgery were randomly allocated either to receive information in advance or not, together with a notice of appointment that all patients receive by mail approximately 2 weeks prior to their visit. Patients in the experimental group received a written information letter in advance about medical education, whereas the control patients did not receive any written information, according to the standard procedure of the surgery. The patients were not told about the study until afterwards and neither the doctors/teachers nor the students knew in advance to which group a certain patient had been allocated. At the end of the visit the patients were asked to complete a questionnaire. RESULTS: The randomization procedure resulted in 83 patients being informed in advance and 86 control patients not being informed. Forty-two patients completed the questionnaire: 19 in the experimental group and 23 in the control group. There was no difference between the groups with regard to reasons for dropping out. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the provision of information in advance does not negatively influence patients' inclination to participate in the clinical training of medical students.

Alternating mitomycin C and BCG instillations versus BCG alone in treatment of carcinoma in situ of the urinary bladder: a nordic study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether, in patients with carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the urinary bladder, alternating instillation therapy with mitomycin C (MMC) and bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) was more effective and less toxic than conventional BCG monotherapy. METHODS: Patients were stratified prospectively for primary, secondary, and concomitant CIS and randomized to one of two regimens. Patients in the alternating group received six weekly intravesical instillations of MMC 40 mg, followed by alternating monthly instillations of BCG 120 mg and MMC for one year. In the monotherapy group, only BCG was instilled on the same schedule. RESULTS: Of 323 enrolled patients, 304 were eligible for analysis. After an overall median follow-up of 56 months, the Kaplan-Meier disease-free estimate for BCG monotherapy was significantly better than that for alternating therapy (p=0.03; log rank test). Risk for progression appeared lower in the BCG monotherapy group (p=0.07), but no differences existed in survival. Besides the regimen, CIS category also predicted outcome to some extent. BCG monotherapy caused significantly more local side-effects and premature cessation of instillation treatment than did the alternating therapy. However, no differences were observed in the number of serious side-effects. CONCLUSION: One-year BCG monotherapy was more effective than the alternating therapy for reducing recurrence and compared well with the best regimens reported from substantially smaller series. The alternating therapy was better tolerated.