A Pregnant Patient (First Trimester) Reporting for Pain in Relation to the Maxillary Left First Molar Was Prescribed a Full Mouth Series Radiographs in the Dental Office.

This case scenario shows the value of conducting a thorough clinical examination that will direct appropriate radiographic selection and prescription criteria to be able to arrive at a diagnosis. Proper management of a patient's chief complaint and imaging needs during pregnancy is of utmost importance. It is prudent to limit ionizing radiation during the first trimester to what is minimally needed and defer elective imaging until after the birth of the baby. It is important for dental health care providers to do what is necessary for the patient for the emergent situation and postpone all elective imaging and follow the published FDA/ADA radiographic selection criteria.

Use of dental radiographic minipanel series in disabled adults in a university-based special care dental clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic efficacy of a minipanel series to a conventional 18-radiograph full-mouth series in a disabled adult population in a university clinic. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Eighty patients who attended the New Jersey Dental School special care services clinic between 2004 and 2006 were selected for a double-blind quasiexperimental study based on existing full-mouth series radiographs. A minipanel series consisting of eight radiographs from the 18-radiograph full-mouth series was used as a comparison against a matched pair of an 18-radiograph exam. The diagnostic efficacy of this eight-radiograph series was tested against the more conventional 18-radiograph full-mouth series to determine whether the minipanel series was an acceptable substitute for the full-mouth series in this population group. Traditionally, it is difficult to obtain full-mouth series radiographs in patients with disabilities. RESULTS: From the 80 studied patients, a total of 2,219 teeth were available for study. A median of 29 teeth per patient was found in the full-mouth series and 28 teeth per patient in the minipanel series category. The difference was statistically significant (P < .001). Of the patients evaluated, 78 (97.5%) had at least one problem detected when the full-mouth series was used. Of these 78 with at least one problem, 74 (94.8%) were identified using the minipanel series. The sensitivity for the minipanel series when compared to the gold-standard full-mouth series was 63% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.2 to 68.0) for tooth-specific disease; the specificity was 92% (95% CI, 92.2 to 94.5). CONCLUSION: Prospective studies are needed for the acceptance and use of minipanel radiographic series in conjunction with a clinical examination.

Screening for cardiovascular risk factors in a dental setting.

BACKGROUND: The authors assessed the utilization of oral health care professionals (OHCPs) as a resource for identifying patients who were unaware of their increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). METHODS: OHCPs administered a CVD risk-screening questionnaire, measured blood pressure and tested cholesterol levels, high-density lipoprotein levels and hemoglobin A1c (HgA1c) levels using "finger-stick" blood testing in 100 patients treated in a dental school clinic who were unaware of their CVD risk status. The authors determined the prevalence of specific risk factors (that is, smoking and abnormal levels of systolic blood pressure, lipids, body mass index and HgA1c) and calculated Framingham 10-year coronary heart disease (CHD) risk scores. RESULTS: Seventeen percent of the 100 patients (35 percent of men, 5 percent of women) had an increased global risk of experiencing a CHD event within 10 years (Framingham risk score>10 percent). Seventy-three percent of participants had one or more risk factors and 31 percent had two or more risk factors present. More men than women had low levels of high-density lipoprotein (45 percent [18/40] of men versus 3.3 percent [2/60] of women; P<.0001). The mean Framingham CHD risk score increased with increasing risk factor burden. CONCLUSIONS: OHCPs identified patients with an increased CHD risk who could benefit from primary prevention activities. A substantial proportion of study patients who were unaware of their risk status were at an increased risk of experiencing a CHD event within 10 years. OHCPs could contribute to public health CHD control efforts.