Establishment and Validation of an Automated System for the Antifactor IIa Assay: A Case Study of Potency Assessment of a Pharmaceutical Gel Formulation.

Antithrombotic agents and anticoagulant drugs, such as those from the heparin family, are employed in clinical settings for the prevention and treatment of clotting, thromboembolism, and wound healing. The potency assessment of antithrombotic agents is typically conducted using antifactor IIa assay with manual systems which are time-consuming and often lack repeatability. Here, we present a novel automated system that significantly enhances assay repeatability, attaining an outstandingly low relative standard deviation (RSD) % of only 0.6% for repeatability. This system has been applied to a pharmaceutical gel formulation for wound healing developed by Abdi Ibrahim Pharmaceuticals R&D Center as a case study for validation. The automated system demonstrated substantial improvements over manual systems in linearity (R2 = 0.9927), precision, accuracy, specificity, and robustness. The system aligns with the European Pharmacopoeia specifications, promising to enhance quality control across pharmaceutical formulations and conduct absorbance-based end-point assays within the pharmaceutical industry while offering increased throughput and cost-effectiveness.

Systematic Screening Study for the Selection of Proper Stabilizers to Produce Physically Stable Canagliflozin Nanosuspension by Wet Milling Method.

One of the crucial approaches to managing the low solubility and weak bioavailability of drugs is via nanocrystal technology. Through this technology, drug particles have an increased solubility and a faster dissolution rate due to high surface free energy, which requires an appropriate stabilizer(s) to prevent instabilities during the manufacturing process and storage of the nanosuspension. This study aimed to establish a scientific predictive system for properly selecting stabilizers or to reduce the attempts on a trial-and-error basis in the wet-milling method. In total, 42 experiments were performed to examine the effect of critical material attributes on the wettability of the drug, the saturation solubility in the stabilizer solutions or combinations thereof and the dynamic viscosity of stabilizer solutions. All data were evaluated by Minitab 19® and an optimization study was performed. The optimized formulation at a certain concentration of stabilizer combination was ground by Dyno Mill® with 0.3 mm beads for one hour. The optimized nanosuspension with a particle size of 204.5 nm was obtained in short milling time and offered 3.05- and 3.51 times better dissolution rates than the marketed drug product (Invokana® 100 mg) in pH 4.5 and pH 6.8 as non-sink conditions, respectively. The formulation was monitored for three months at room temperature and 4 °C. The parameters were 261.30 nm, 0.163, -14.1 mV and 261.50 nm, 0.216 and -17.8 mV, respectively. It was concluded that this approach might indicate the appropriate selection of stabilizers for the wet-milling process.

Single-Dose Crossover Comparative Bioavailability Study of Two Different Posaconazole 100 mg Gastro-Resistant Tablets Under Fasted and Fed Conditions in Healthy Volunteers.

Objective: This study aimed to compare the bioavailability of two different gastro-resistant oral tablet formulations of posaconazole under fasted and fed conditions and to evaluate a potential food effect on the bioavailability of each formulation. Materials and Methods: Healthy volunteers randomly assigned to receive a test product (Posagil® 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) or reference product (Noxafil® 100 mg gastro-resistant tablet) were included in this single-center, randomized, four-period (days 1, 15, 29 and 43), four-sequence crossover comparative bioavailability study. Data on posaconazole plasma concentrations and related pharmacokinetic profile (the maximum observed plasma concentration [Cmax] from time 0 to the time of last observed quantifiable plasma concentration [AUC0-T] and from time zero to infinity [AUC0-∞]) were recorded to evaluate efficacy of the test product in relation to the reference product under both fasted and fed conditions, based on bioequivalence (T-fasted vs. R-fasted and T-fed vs. R-fed) and food effect (T-fasted vs. T-fed and R-fasted vs. R-fed) assessments. Safety was evaluated through assessment of adverse events (AEs), standard laboratory evaluations, and vital signs. Results: The bioequivalence criteria were met under fed conditions (T-fed vs. R-fed: geometric LSMean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-T, and AUC0-∞ of posaconazole were 97.41%, 97.45%, and 97.08%, respectively; all within the range of 80% to 125%) but not under fasted conditions. There was a food effect on the reference product (R-fed vs. R-fasted: geometric LSMean ratios of Cmax, AUC0-T, and AUC0-∞ of posaconazole were 145.32%, 138.84%, and 138.46%, respectively) but not on the test product. No safety concerns were identified. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the pharmacokinetic profile of Posagil® is similar to the pharmacokinetic profile of Noxafil®. The generic Posagil® seems to have similarly high bioavailability under fed and fasted conditions, offering a higher posaconazole exposure than the original Noxafil® in the fasted state. Hence, Posagil® may be considered a value-added generic product that offers adequate posaconazole exposure under fasted state and fed state, regardless of the concomitant high-fat meal intake.