Clinical utility of multiple secondary combined tests in prostate cancer screening.

INTRODUCTION: The clinical utility of concurrent Prostate Health Index (PHI) and ExosomeDx Prostate Intelliscore (EPI) testing is unclear. We sought to examine the performance of combined PHI and EPI testing on men undergoing elevated PSA work up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who received both EPI and PHI testing were identified from an institutional database of men referred to urology for an elevated total PSA. Cut points of EPI > 15.6 and PHI ≥ 36 were used to denote a positive test. Patients were placed into one of four groups determined by combination of EPI and PHI results. Demographic variables and biopsy recommendations were compared between groups. The concordance of test positivity between EPI and PHI was compared by Cohen's kappa. Demographic variables and secondary testing results were compared between patients' compliant and non-compliant with prostate biopsy recommendation. Biopsy pathology was compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients had both EPI and PHI testing. Median age was 65 years, with a median PSA of 6.64 ng/mL. Age (p = 0.001), PSA (< 0.001) and biopsy recommendation (< 0.001) differed between combined secondary screening test result groups. Seventy-five percent of patients with both a positive EPI and PHI were found to have prostate cancer, with 54.2% being ≥ Gleason 7. Cohen's kappa was 0.19, indicating poor concordance. The AUC of EPI and PHI for clinically significant cancer was 0.563 (95% CI: 0.4331-0.6923) and 0.685 (95% CI: 0.569-0.8) (p = 0.147). CONCLUSIONS: Concurrently positive EPI and PHI indicate increased prostate cancer risk, with combined usage potentially influencing biopsy recommendation and compliance.

Advanced chronic kidney disease; A comparison between nephroureterectomy and nephron-sparing surgery for upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Renal function outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients are not well established. We sought to compare the incidence and factors associated with development of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) between RNU and NSS and examine the role of acute kidney injury (AKI) on renal function outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed an institutional database for patients who underwent either RNU or NSS for UTUC. Cumulative incidence of postoperative advanced CKD, defined as eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2, was compared between groups. Fine-Gray competing risk regression was used to identify predictors of advanced CKD. Locally weight scatterplot smoothing was used to assess postoperative eGFR trends. AKI events were counted, staged, and assessed for influence of progression to advanced CKD. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-six patients were included in analysis, with a median follow up of 6.68 years (IQR 3.4-12.2). Median preoperative eGFR was similar between the groups (NSS: 68 ml/min/1.73 m2, RNU: 65 ml/min/1.73 m2,P = 0.220). Cumulative incidence of advanced CKD was significantly lower in the NSS cohort (P = 0.009). Factors associated with advanced CKD included age, diabetes, recurrent AKI and RNU. Percent of patients with an AKI event differed between the groups (51.5% NSS, 72.7% RNU, P = <0.001), there was no between group difference in percentage of patients with recurrent AKI (25.6% NSS, 25.9% RNU, P =1). CONCLUSION: NSS provides a renal function benefit in UTUC. AKI is common among UTUC patients and recurrent AKI is a risk factor for development of advanced CKD.

Genomic Sequencing Should Not be Part of the Standard of Care for Most Urologic Cancers.

There are currently few situations in which genomic testing is actionable for genitourinary tumors. Without clear indications or treatment paradigms, genomic sequencing cannot be recommended as a standard of care for genitourinary tumors.