Urinary cystatin B differentiates progressive versus stable IRIS Stage 1 chronic kidney disease in dogs.

BACKGROUND: Early identification of dogs with progressive vs stable chronic kidney disease (CKD) might afford opportunity for interventions that would slow progression. However, currently no surrogate biomarker reliably predicts CKD progression. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Urinary cystatin B (uCysB), a novel kidney injury biomarker, predicts progressive disease in International Renal Interest Society (IRIS) CKD Stage 1. ANIMALS: Seventy-two dogs, including 20 dogs from 4 university centers with IRIS CKD Stage 1, with IDEXX symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) concentration up to 17 µg/dL and no systemic comorbidities, and 52 clinically healthy staff-owned dogs from a fifth university center. METHODS: A multicenter prospective longitudinal study was conducted between 2016 and 2021 to assess uCysB concentration in IRIS CKD Stage 1 and control dogs. Dogs were followed to a maximum of 3 years (control) or 25 months (CKD). Stage 1 IRIS CKD was classified as stable or progressive using the slope of 1/SDMA, calculated from 3 timepoints during the initial 90-day period. Dogs with slope above or below -0.0007 week × dL/µg were classified as stable or progressive, respectively. Mixed effects modeling was used to assess the association between uCysB and progression rate. RESULTS: Estimates of first visit uCysB results predictive of active ongoing kidney injury based on the mixed effects models were 17 ng/mL for control, 24 ng/mL for stable CKD, and 212 ng/mL for progressive CKD (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Urinary cystatin B differentiated stable vs progressive IRIS CKD Stage 1. Identification of dogs with progressive CKD may provide an opportunity for clinicians to intervene early and slow progression rate.

Differentiation of stable kidney function versus progressive dysfunction in dogs.

BACKGROUND: Circulating creatinine and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) are biomarkers of kidney function that have been used variously to define stable vs progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD). Slope monitoring of inverse biomarker values (creatinine-1 or SDMA-1 ) has shown promise, but quantitative criteria to distinguish stable vs progressive CKD using this approach are lacking. OBJECTIVE: Assessment of creatinine-1 and SDMA-1 slope cutoffs to distinguish stable vs progressive CKD. ANIMALS: One hundred ten clinically healthy university staff-owned dogs and 29 male colony dogs with progressive X-linked hereditary nephropathy (XLHN). METHODS: Retrospective analysis combining 2 prospective observational studies, 1 tracking kidney function biomarkers in healthy dogs (HDs) to a maximum of 3 years, and 1 tracking kidney function biomarkers in male colony dogs with progressive XLHN to a maximum of 1 year. The minimum slope of creatinine-1 or SDMA-1 as measured using the IDEXX SDMA test from HD was assigned as the slope cutoff for stable kidney function. RESULTS: The stable vs progressive slope cutoff was -0.0119 week × dL/mg for creatinine-1 and -0.0007 week × dL/µg for SDMA-1 . CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In the studied CKD population, progressive dysfunction can be distinguished from stable kidney function by using the slope of creatinine-1 or SDMA-1 . These criteria may serve to characterize CKD in other cohorts of dogs and to establish guidelines for degrees of progression rate in dogs with naturally occurring CKD.

5-Hydroxytryptophan toxicity successfully treated by haemodialysis in a dog.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a case of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) toxicity successfully treated with haemodialysis in a dog. CASE SUMMARY: A 3-year-old, male neutered Labrador Retriever, weighing 28.2 kg, presented to the emergency department approximately 4-5 h after ingesting a human supplement containing 200 mg of 5-HTP. The amount of 5-HTP ingested was estimated between 980 and 1988 mg (35-71 mg/kg). At presentation, the dog demonstrated progressive neurologic abnormalities consistent with serotonin syndrome, including altered mentation and ataxia. Due to the magnitude of the ingested dose and progression of clinical signs, extracorporeal blood purification with intermittent haemodialysis was chosen to expedite clearance of 5-HTP. High-efficiency haemodialysis was initiated, and the dog showed continued clinical improvement throughout the 5-h treatment. Clinical signs resolved completely within 12 h. Sequential blood and urine samples were obtained to document levels of both 5-HTP and serotonin. The dog was discharged 24 h after presentation with complete resolution of clinical signs. NEW OR UNIQUE INFORMATION: This is the first report documenting the serial changes in 5-HTP concentrations during treatment with haemodialysis.

Analgesic comparison of meloxicam or ketoprofen for orthopedic surgery in dogs.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of 2 analgesic protocols (preoperative meloxicam or intraoperative ketoprofen administration) during the first 24 hours after orthopedic surgery in dogs. STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind, prospective randomized clinical trial. ANIMALS: Sixty client-owned dogs. METHODS: Dogs with surgical orthopedic disorders were randomly separated into 2 groups: 30 dogs were administered 0.2 mg/kg meloxicam intravenously (IV) immediately before induction and 30 dogs were administered 2 mg/kg ketoprofen IV, 30 minutes before the end of surgery. Pain was assessed with a visual analog scale (VAS) and a cumulative pain score (CPS) preoperatively and at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 24 hours after extubation. Selected serum biochemical variables were measured before and 24 hours after surgery and, buccal mucosal bleeding time (BMBT) and whole blood clotting time (WBCT) were measured before and 8 hours after surgery. Dogs were anesthetized with propofol and maintained on halothane in oxygen. Any complications were documented for 7 days after surgery. Results were compared between the 2 groups for significant differences in VAS scores (2-sample t-test) and in CPS (Wilcoxon's 2-sample test). Moreover, results were analyzed for significant differences in area under the curve (AUC) for VAS (2-sample t-test) and CPS (Wilcoxon's 2-sample test) among groups. To assess the effects of treatments on biochemical and coagulation functions, pre- and postoperative mean values of BMBT and WBCT were compared within both treatment groups (paired t-tests) and between both groups (2-sample t-test). RESULTS: No significant differences in pain response or coagulation were found between meloxicam- and ketoprofen-treated dogs. In both groups, alkaline phosphatase and alanine aminotransferase concentrations were significantly increased compared with baseline. No serious complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative administration of meloxicam is a safe and effective method of controlling postoperative pain for up to 24 hours in dogs undergoing orthopedic surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Analgesia after administration of preoperative meloxicam was comparable with administration of ketoprofen at the end of the surgery.