Organizational aspects to optimize patient's ambulatory pathway.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Successful ambulatory care implementation should combine both medical and organizational features. These two components are closely interrelated. Only optimal organization, part of a quality management program, will allow us to perform safe medical procedures and provide good patient satisfaction. This review is intended to update organizational concepts that could improve ambulatory surgery center efficiency. RECENT FINDINGS: Current organizational concepts are based on the implementation of a dedicated pathway that could be divided into sequential steps, wherein the concepts of flow time and throughput should be applied. Wasted times have to be evaluated and suppressed, so patients have to spend only the minimum required time at each step. A 'forward pathway' would allow maintaining unidirectional patients' flow to avoid any blockade and to build sequential surgical program planning. These processes are easier to implement in dedicated facilities, managed by a dedicated staff, after extensive patient preoperative information, and with the use of numeric information systems. SUMMARY: Organizational feature in ambulatory surgery center is a major determinant of patient flow, activity, resource utilization, safety, and patient satisfaction. Most of these basic principles may contribute to improve the quality of care that can also be of benefit to conventional surgical activity.

Accuracy of patient's turnover time prediction using RFID technology in an academic ambulatory surgery center.

Patients flow in outpatient surgical unit is a major issue with regards to resource utilization, overall case load and patient satisfaction. An electronic Radio Frequency Identification Device (RFID) was used to document the overall time spent by the patients between their admission and discharge from the unit. The objective of this study was to evaluate how a RFID-based data collection system could provide an accurate prediction of the actual time for the patient to be discharged from the ambulatory surgical unit after surgery. This is an observational prospective evaluation carried out in an academic ambulatory surgery center (ASC). Data on length of stay at each step of the patient care, from admission to discharge, were recorded by a RFID device and analyzed according to the type of surgical procedure, the surgeon and the anesthetic technique. Based on these initial data (n = 1520), patients were scheduled in a sequential manner according to the expected duration of the previous case. The primary endpoint was the difference between actual and predicted time of discharge from the unit. A total of 414 consecutive patients were prospectively evaluated. One hundred seventy four patients (42%) were discharged at the predicted time ± 30 min. Only 24% were discharged behind predicted schedule. Using an automatic record of patient's length of stay would allow an accurate prediction of the discharge time according to the type of surgery, the surgeon and the anesthetic procedure.

Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided distal blocks for analgesia without motor blockade after ambulatory hand surgery.

PURPOSE: To assess the suitability of ultrasound-guided (USG), single-injection distal block(s) for pain management after outpatient hand and wrist bone surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 125 of 198 consecutive ambulatory surgery patients who underwent hand and wrist bone surgery between June 2010 and January 2012. All patients received a USG axillary block using a short-acting local anesthetic (lidocaine) and secondary 1, 2, or 3 (median, radial, or ulnar) USG distal analgesic block(s) using a long-acting local anesthetic (ropivacaine). All patients were contacted by phone on the first postoperative day. All patients received a concomitant prescription of acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with opioids as a rescue treatment. Effectiveness and duration of the distal nerve blocks, compliance with analgesic treatment and rescue opioids requirement, opioid-related side effects, prolonged upper limb motor block, quality of sleep on first postoperative night, and patient satisfaction were evaluated. RESULTS: Most distal analgesic blocks were effective (120 of 125; 96%), with an average duration of nearly 12 hours On the first day after surgery, 28 patients (23%) had a numeric verbal scale greater than 3, although 14 of them had taken the rescue opioids. No patient reported prolonged motor blockade or insensate limb. Opioid-related side effects occurred in 23% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: After hand and wrist bone surgery, USG selective distal blocks using a long-acting local anesthetic, combined with oral analgesics, were effective in a large majority of patients. However, pain control was suboptimal for some especially painful procedures such as wrist surgery, trapeziometacarpal arthrodesis, and finger amputation. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.