Antigenic similarity among group 1 allergens from grasses and quantitation ELISA using monoclonal antibodies to Phl p 1.

BACKGROUND: Group 1 allergens elicit a specific IgE response in about 90% of grass pollen-allergic patients. The aim of this work was to study the antigenic similarity among group 1 allergens from different grasses and to develop a monoclonal antibody (MAb)-based quantitation ELISA. METHODS: Twenty specific MAbs were produced from BALB/c mice immunized with natural Phl p 1. These MAbs were tested for specificity with thirteen different grass pollen extracts from the Poaceae family and in cross-inhibition experiments for the binding of Phl p 1. Purified group 1 allergens from Poeae grasses (Dactylis glomerata, Lolium perenne, Festuca pratensis and Poa pratensis) were tested for parallelism in quantitation ELISA. RESULTS: Eighteen to nineteen anti-Phl p 1 MAbs recognized the homologous allergen in pollen extracts from grasses of the Poeae tribe. In contrast, only four MAbs recognized group 1 from Cynodon dactylon and Phragmites communis. Four groups of MAbs with different epitope specificity were identified. A grass group 1 quantitation ELISA was developed using a mix of three MAbs on the solid phase and a polyclonal rabbit antibody as the second antibody. The group 1 content could be measured in different batches of Phleum pratense as well as in pollen extracts from Poeae grasses, since they showed parallel dose-response curves. CONCLUSIONS: MAbs produced in this work enabled us to show the high antigenic similarity between group 1 allergens from temperate grasses. The results prove the usefulness of the ELISA method developed for standardization of grass allergen products.

Assessing allergen levels in peach and nectarine cultivars.

BACKGROUND: The lipid transfer protein Pru p 3 has been identified as a major peach fruit allergen. However, the putative peach member of the Bet v 1 family, Pru p 1, has been neither identified nor characterized. OBJECTIVES: To determine the distribution and solubility properties of the main peach allergens and to quantify Pru p 3 and Pru p 1 levels in peach and nectarine cultivars. METHODS: Peach peel and pulp were extracted using different buffers, and extracts were analyzed by means of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and immunodetection using polyclonal antibodies against lipid transfer proteins, profilins, and Bet v 1 homologues. Pru p 3 was quantified in peach and nectarine cultivars using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. A similar method was developed to quantify Pru p 1. RESULTS: A differential distribution between peel and pulp and different solubility properties were found for Pru p 3, Pru p 1, and peach profilin. Mean Pru p 3 levels were 132.86, 0.61, and 16.92 microg/g of fresh weight of peels, pulps, and whole fruits, respectively. The corresponding mean Pru p 1 levels were 0.62, 0.26, and 0.09 microg/g of fresh weight. Most US cultivars showed higher levels of both allergens than Spanish cultivars. CONCLUSIONS: The different distribution and solubility properties of the main peach allergens can determine the quality of fruit extracts used as diagnostic tools. These differences, together with the natural variation of Pru p 3 and Pru p 1 levels among peach and nectarine cultivars, can be exploited to reduce peach allergenicity by means of industrial processing and plant breeding.

Variability of Ole e 9 allergen in olive pollen extracts: relevance of minor allergens in immunotherapy treatments.

BACKGROUND: Clustered severe adverse reactions to immunotherapy with olive pollen extracts have been occasionally reported in areas where olive trees are extensively grown. Allergic patients from these areas, in addition to the major olive pollen allergen Ole e 1, frequently recognize a recently described allergen, Ole e 9. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop an immunoassay to measure Ole e 9 concentration and to study the variability of this allergen in olive pollen extracts. METHODS: Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) to Ole e 9 were produced from mice immunized with the pure allergen. One of these mAbs was used to develop a sandwich ELISA with an anti-olive pollen extract rabbit serum as the tracer. Olive pollen batches from several suppliers were analyzed using this method. These batches were also analyzed for Ole e 1 content and biological activity. RESULTS: A 10-fold variation between the extreme values was found for the biological activity of the batches analyzed. Ole e 1 concentration showed a 25-fold variation. Variability of Ole e 9 concentration was extremely high, up to 161 times. The ratio Ole e 1/Ole e 9 varied in a range from 0.6 to 390.4. CONCLUSION: The availability of a mAb-based ELISA for Ole e 9 made it possible for us to detect an important source of variability in olive pollen batches. This variability may be the cause of outbreaks of adverse reactions in the course of immunotherapy treatments, which have sometimes been observed among olive-allergic patients living in areas with very high levels of airborne olive pollen.

The effect of endotoxin on the production of IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies against the cat allergen Fel d 1 in mice.

BACKGROUND: Endotoxin/LPS is ubiquitous in our environment. The question whether lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is beneficial or disease-promoting in relation to asthma and allergy has been raised in several recent studies. Some have reported a positive correlation between the level of LPS in house dust and the symptoms of asthmatic children. Others have found that exposure to LPS appears to protect against the development of atopic disease in children. OBJECTIVES: We performed a study in mice to examine the antibody response after subcutaneous immunization with LPS and the cat allergen Fel d 1. We asked whether LPS would increase the response and direct the antibody production towards an allergic (IgE), or non-allergic (IgG2a) antibody profile. In rodents both IgE and IgG1 are antibodies produced under Th2-dependence and IgG2a antibodies under Th1-dependence. Also, when LPS and Fel d 1 are introduced to the immune system, we asked whether the timing of the two agents relative to each other is crucial. METHODS: The mice were injected subcutaneously with LPS and/or Fel d 1 four times in various orders. IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies specific to Fel d 1 were measured in serum using ELISA. RESULTS: A strong antibody response, both for IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a, was observed only when Fel d 1 and LPS were injected simultaneously, and in particular after repeated injections. CONCLUSION: A strong specific antibody response was observed, both for IgE, IgG1 and IgG2a, only when LPS was introduced to the immune system together with the cat allergen Fel d 1. No such adjuvant effect was observed when LPS was introduced alone prior to or subsequent to the allergen. The resulting antibody response was not polarized in terms of Th1- or Th2-dependence.

Immunoassay to quantify the major peach allergen Pru p 3 in foodstuffs. Differential allergen release and stability under physiological conditions.

Pru p 3 is a lipid transfer protein (LTP) that has been identified as the major peach (Prunus persica) allergen. However, little is known about the amount present in both raw and processed foodstuffs. Moreover, the in vivo release upon consumption of peach-containing foods remains unclear. We have developed a sensitive monoclonal antibody-based ELISA for Pru p 3. The method has been applied to measure the allergen levels in foodstuffs and the allergen release under different physiological conditions. A significant variability in all raw peaches and peach-containing foods tested has been detected. The allergen was extracted more efficiently at a low pH, and it was highly resistant to pepsin. This ELISA will be very useful in controlling the allergen concentration in diagnostics, in evaluating threshold levels in provocation tests, and in detecting hidden allergens in processed foods and cosmetics.