3D reactive inkjet printing of poly-ɛ-lysine/gellan gum hydrogels for potential corneal constructs.

Corneal opacities are the 4th leading cause of blindness, and the only current treatment method is the replacement of damaged tissue with a donor cornea. The worldwide shortage of donor eye bank tissue has influenced research into biomaterial substrates for both partial and full thickness corneal implantation. Here, polymer hydrogels based on natural peptides, poly-ɛ-lysine and gellan gum, can be manufactured using reactive inkjet printing (RIJ). The inks used for printing were optimised based on their rheological properties. Printing alternating layers of ink forms a unique surface pattern, based on the immediate formation of ionic bonds between polymers of opposing charges. This surface pattern resembles a repeating honeycomb-like structure, visible by both optical and scanning electron microscopy. The structure of the printed hydrogels can be modified to include pores, a feature of interest for the tissue engineering of full thickness corneal constructs. Printed poly-ɛ-lysine/gellan gum hydrogels demonstrated a transparency of 80% and cyto-compatibility with both corneal epithelial and endothelial cells. Both corneal cell types demonstrated cell attachment across the surface of the printed hydrogel arrays, displaying their typical cell morphology. This gives confidence of the cyto-compatibility of these hydrogels in vitro. Reactive inkjet printing can produce 3D structures with a high resolution, producing printed tracks in the micron range. Additionally, RIJ demonstrates versatility, as constructs can be tailored to meet various dimension and thickness requirements. Furthermore, this work demonstrates for the first time that reactive inkjet printing can been used to produce hydrogel constructs based on these two inks, with the aim of producing constructs for corneal tissue engineering.

Characterization of Tunable Poly-ε-Lysine-Based Hydrogels for Corneal Tissue Engineering.

A family of poly-ε-lysine hydrogels can be synthesized by crosslinking with bis-carboxylic acids using carbodiimide chemistry. In addition to creating hydrogels using a simple cast method, a fragmented method is used to introduce increased porosity within the hydrogel structure. Both methods have created tunable characteristics ranging in their mechanical properties, transparency, and water content, which is of interest to corneal tissue engineering and can be tailored to specific cellular needs and applications. With a worldwide shortage of cornea donor tissue available for transplant and limitations including rejection and potential infection, a synthetic material that can be used as a graft, or a partial thickness corneal replacement, would be an advantageous treatment method. These hydrogels can be tuned to have similar mechanical and transparency properties to the human cornea. They also support the attachment and growth of corneal epithelial cells and the integration of corneal stromal cells.

Application of SPF moisturisers is inferior to sunscreens in coverage of facial and eyelid regions.

Many moisturisers contain sun protection factors (SPF) equivalent to those found in sunscreens. However, there is a lack of research into how SPF moisturiser application compares to sunscreens in terms of coverage achieved and protection afforded. Previously we demonstrated that users incompletely covered their eyelid regions during routine sunscreen application. Here, we aimed to determine if SPF moisturiser users also displayed these tendencies. A study population of 84 participants (22 males, 62 females, age 18-57) were exposed to UV radiation and photographed using a tripod mounted UV sensitive DSLR camera on two separate visits. At visit one, images were acquired before and after applying either SPF30 sunscreen or moisturiser, then at visit two the study was repeated with the other formulation. Images were processed for facial landmark identification followed by segmentation mapping of hue saturation values to identify areas of the face that were/were not covered. Analyses revealed that application of moisturiser was significantly worse than sunscreen in terms area of the whole face missed (11.1% missed with sunscreen compared to 16.6% for SPF moisturiser p<0.001 paired t-test). This difference was primarily due to decreased coverage of the eyelid regions (14.0% missed with sunscreen, 20.9% moisturiser, p<0.001). Analysis of a post-study questionnaire revealed participants to be unaware of their incomplete coverage. Secondary analyses revealed improved coverage in males (p = 0.05), and, with moisturiser only, in participants with darker skin tones (p = 0.02). Together these data indicate that, despite potential advantages in terms of increased frequency of application of moisturiser, the areas of the face that are at higher cancer risk are likely not being protected, and that participants are unaware that they are at risk. As such, alternative sun-protection strategies should be promoted.