A Pediatric Cervical Spine Clearance Guideline Leads to Fewer Unnecessary Computed Tomography Scans and Decreased Radiation Exposure.

OBJECTIVES: Physical examination and computed tomography (CT) are useful to rule out cervical spine injury (CSI). Computed tomography scans increase lifetime cancer risk in children from radiation exposure. Most CSI in children occur between the occiput and C4. We developed a cervical spine (C-spine) clearance guideline to reduce unnecessary CTs and radiation exposure in pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: A pediatric C-spine clearance guideline was implemented in September 2018 at our Level 2 Pediatric Trauma Center. Guidance included CT of C1 to C4 to scan only high-yield regions versus the entire C-spine and decrease radiation dose. A retrospective cohort study was conducted comparing preguideline and postguideline of all pediatric trauma patients younger than 8 years screened for CSI from July 2017 to December 2020. Primary endpoints included the following: number of full C-spine and C1 to C4 CT scans and radiation dose. Secondary endpoints were CSI rate and missed CSI. Results were compared using χ 2 and Wilcoxon rank-sum test with P < 0.05 significant. RESULTS: The review identified 726 patients: 273 preguideline and 453 postguideline. A similar rate of total C-spine CTs were done in both groups (23.1% vs 23.4%, P = 0.92). Full C-spine CTs were more common preguideline (22.7% vs 11.9%, P < 0.001), whereas C1 to C4 CT scans were more common post-guideline (11.5% vs 0.4%, P < 0.001). Magnetic resonance imaging utilization and CSIs identified were similar in both groups. The average radiation dose was lower postguideline (114 vs 265 mGy·cm -1 ; P < 0.001). There were no missed CSI. CONCLUSIONS: A pediatric C-spine clearance guideline led to increasing CT of C1 to C4 over full C-spine imaging, reducing the radiation dose in children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic.

A Survey Assessing Pediatric Transport Team Composition and Training.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess national pediatric/neonatal specialty transport teams' composition and training requirements to determine if any current standardization exists. METHODS: This was a survey of the transport teams listed with the American Academy of Pediatrics via SurveyMonkey. RESULTS: While most of the teams maintain internal criteria for team competency and training, there is large variation across team compositions. The vast majority of the teams have a nurse-led team with the addition of another nurse, medic, and/or respiratory therapist regardless of mode of transport. Many of the teams report adjusting team composition based on acuity. Fewer than 15% of teams have a physician as a standard team member. More than 80% required a minimum number of supervised intubations prior to independent practice; however, the number varied largely from as little as 3 to as many as 30. Eighty-eight percent of the teams report using simulation as part of their education program, but again there were marked differences between teams as to how it was used. CONCLUSIONS: There is tremendous variability nationally among pediatric/neonatal transport teams regarding training requirements, certifications, and team composition. The lack of standardization regarding team member qualifications or maintenance of competency among specialized transport teams should be looked at more closely, and evidence-based guidelines may help lead to further improved outcomes in the care of critically ill pediatric patients in the prehospital setting.

Does Simulation Improve Recognition and Management of Pediatric Septic Shock, and If One Simulation Is Good, Is More Simulation Better?

OBJECTIVES: Determine whether serial simulation training sessions improve resident recognition and initial septic shock management in a critically ill simulated septic shock patient, and to determine whether serial simulations further improve resident task performance when compared with a single simulation session. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study with a live expert review of trainee simulation performance. Expert reviewers blinded to prior trainee performance. SETTING: A PICU room in a quaternary-care children's hospital, featuring a hi-fidelity pediatric patient simulator. SUBJECTS: Postgraduate year-2 and postgraduate year-3 pediatric residents who rotate through the PICU. INTERVENTIONS: Postgraduate year-3 residents as the control cohort, completing one simulation near the start of their third residency year. Postgraduate year-2 residents as the intervention cohort, completing two simulations during their second residency year and one near the start of their third residency year. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Resident objective performance was measured using a validated 27-item checklist (graded 0/1) related to monitoring, data gathering, and interventions in the diagnosis and management of pediatric septic shock. The intervention cohort had a higher mean performance percentage score during their third simulation than the control cohort completing their single simulation (87% vs 77%; p < 0.001). Septic shock was correctly diagnosed more often in the intervention cohort at the time of their third simulation (100% vs 78%; p < 0.001). Appropriate broad-spectrum antibiotics were administered correctly more often in the intervention cohort (83% vs 50%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Simulations significantly improved resident performance scores in the management of septic shock with repetitive simulation showing significant ongoing improvements. Further studies are needed to determine long-term impact on knowledge and skill retention and whether results attained in a simulation environment are translatable into clinical practice in improving bedside care.