Incidence of radiographic and clinically significant pneumothorax or hemothorax after thoracic discectomy via mini-open lateral retropleural approach without prophylactic chest tube placement.

OBJECTIVE: The mini-open lateral retropleural (MO-LRP) approach is an effective option for surgically treating thoracic disc herniations, but the approach raises concerns for pneumothorax (PTX). However, chest tube placement causes insertion site tenderness, necessitates consultation services, increases radiation exposure (requires multiple radiographs), delays the progression of care, and increases narcotic requirements. This study examined the incidence of radiographic and clinically significant PTX and hemothorax (HTX) after the MO-LRP approach, without the placement of a prophylactic chest tube, for thoracic disc herniation. METHODS: This study was a single-institution retrospective evaluation of consecutive cases from 2017 to 2022. Electronic medical records were reviewed, including postoperative chest radiographs, radiology and operative reports, and postoperative notes. The presence of PTX or HTX was determined on chest radiographs obtained in all patients immediately after surgery, with interval radiographs if either was present. The size was categorized as large (≥ 3 cm) or small (< 3 cm) based on guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians. PTX or HTX was considered clinically significant if it required intervention. RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent thoracic discectomy via the MO-LRP approach. All patients were included. Twenty patients were men (67%), and 10 (33%) were women. The patients ranged in age from 25 to 74 years. The most commonly treated level was T11-12 (n = 11, 37%). Intraoperative violation of parietal pleura occurred in 5 patients (17%). No patient had prophylactic chest tube placement. Fifteen patients (50%) had PTX on postoperative chest radiographs; 2 patients had large PTXs, and 13 had small PTXs. Both patients with large PTXs had expansion on repeat radiographs and were treated with chest tube insertion. Of the 13 patients with a small PTX, 1 required 100% oxygen using a nonrebreather mask; the remainder were asymptomatic. One patient, who had no abnormal findings on the immediate postoperative chest radiograph, developed an incidental HTX on postoperative day 6 and was treated with chest tube insertion. Thus, 3 patients (10%) required a chest tube: 2 for expanding PTX and 1 for delayed HTX. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients who undergo thoracic discectomy via the MO-LRP approach do not develop clinically significant PTX or HTX. PTX and HTX in this patient population should be treated with a chest tube only when there are postoperative clinical and radiographic indications.

A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.

OBJECTIVE: Interbody fusion is the primary method for achieving arthrodesis across the lumbosacral junction in the setting of degenerative pathologies, such as spondylosis and spondylolisthesis. Two common techniques are anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). In recent years, interbody design and technology have advanced, and most earlier studies comparing ALIF and TLIF did not specifically assess the lumbosacral junction. This study compared changes in radiographic and clinical parameters between patients undergoing modern-era single-level ALIF and minimally invasive surgery (MIS) TLIF at L5-S1. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent single-segment L5-S1 ALIF or MIS TLIF performed by the senior authors over a 6-year interval (January 1, 2016-November 30, 2021) were retrospectively reviewed. Upright radiographs were used to determine pre- and postoperative lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, disc angle, and neuroforaminal height. Improvements in patient-reported outcome scores (Oswestry Disability Index and SF-36) were also compared. RESULTS: Overall, 108 patients (58 [54%] men, 50 [46%] women; mean [SD] age 57.6 [13.5] years) were included in the study. ALIF was performed in 49 patients, and TLIF was performed in 59 patients. The most common treatment indications were spondylolisthesis (50%, 54/108) and spondylosis (46%, 50/108). The cohorts did not differ in terms of intraoperative (p > 0.99) or postoperative (p = 0.73) complication rates. The mean (SD) hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for patients undergoing TLIF than ALIF (1.3 [0.6] days vs 2.0 [1.4] days, p < 0.001). Both techniques significantly improved L5-S1 segmental lordosis, disc angle, and neuroforaminal height (p ≤ 0.008). ALIF versus TLIF significantly increased mean [SD] segmental lordosis (12.5° [7.3°] vs 2.0° [5.7°], p < 0.001), disc angle (14.8° [5.5°] vs 3.0° [6.1°], p < 0.001), and neuroforaminal height (4.5 [4.6] mm vs 2.4 [3.0] mm, p = 0.008). Improvements in patient-reported outcome parameters and reoperation rates were similar between cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: When treating patients at a single segment across the lumbosacral junction, ALIF resulted in significantly greater increases in segmental lordosis, L5-S1 disc angle, and neuroforaminal height compared with MIS TLIF. Improvements in clinical parameters and reoperation rates were similar between the 2 techniques.

Technique for Validation of Intraoperative Navigation in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative 3-dimensional navigation is an enabling technology that has quickly become a commonplace in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). It provides a useful adjunct for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. Although navigation is associated with many benefits, including improvement in overall screw accuracy, navigation errors can lead to misplaced instrumentation and potential complications or revision surgery. It is difficult to confirm navigation accuracy without a distant reference point. OBJECTIVE: To describe a simple technique for validating navigation accuracy in the operating room during MISS. METHODS: The operating room is set up in a standard fashion for MISS with intraoperative cross-sectional imaging available. A 16-gauge needle is placed within the bone of the spinous process before intraoperative cross-sectional imaging. The entry level is chosen such that the space between the reference array and the needle encompasses the surgical construct. Before placing each pedicle screw, accuracy is verified by placing the navigation probe over the needle. RESULTS: This technique has identified navigation inaccuracy and led to repeat cross-sectional imaging. No screws have been misplaced in the senior author's cases since adopting this technique, and there have been no complications attributable to the technique. CONCLUSION: Navigation inaccuracy is an inherent risk in MISS, but the described technique may mitigate this risk by providing a stable reference point.