Clinical trial: a randomized trial of early endoscopy, Helicobacter pylori testing and empirical therapy for the management of dyspepsia in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Early endoscopy, Helicobacter pylori eradication and empirical acid suppression are commonly used dyspepsia management strategies in primary care but have not been directly compared in a single trial. AIM: To compare endoscopy, H. pylori test and refer, H. pylori test and treat and empirical acid suppression for dyspepsia in primary care. METHODS: Patients presenting to their general practitioner with dyspepsia were randomized to endoscopy, H. pylori'test and treat', H. pylori test and endoscope positives, or empirical therapy with symptoms, patient satisfaction, healthcare costs and cost effectiveness at 12 months being the outcomes. RESULTS: At 2 months, the proportion of patients reporting no or minimal dyspeptic symptoms ranged from 74% for those having early endoscopy to 55% for those on empirical therapy (P = 0.009), but at 1 year, there was little difference among the four strategies. Early endoscopy was associated with fewer subsequent consultations for dyspepsia (P = 0.003). 'Test and treat' resulted in fewer endoscopies overall and was most cost-effective over a range of cost assumptions. Empirical therapy resulted in the lowest initial costs, but the highest rate of subsequent endoscopy. Gastro-oesophageal cancers were found in four patients randomized to the H. pylori testing strategies. CONCLUSIONS: While early endoscopy offered some advantages 'Test and treat' was the most cost-effective strategy. In older patients, early endoscopy may be an appropriate strategy in view of the greater risk of malignant disease.

Systematic review: the liver in coeliac disease.

BACKGROUND: For over a decade isolated reports have noted liver histology and biochemistry changes in patients with coeliac disease. The prevalence and response to treatment is clinically important. AIM: To outline the frequency and significance of liver abnormalities in coeliac disease. METHODS: A Medline search using Ovid-Coeliac/Coeliac (exp) and liver disease (exp) was completed of English references published during 1966-June 2003. Bibliographic references and other appropriate sources were also searched. RESULTS: Six studies reported liver biochemistry in 591 patients; 248 patients had abnormal results. Elevated transaminases were the most frequently reported abnormality. A gluten-free diet produced resolution of elevated transaminases in 115 of 130 patients. There was a greater than expected association with primary biliary cirrhosis and advanced liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: Mildly abnormal liver biochemistry is frequent in untreated coeliac disease and may provide a key to the diagnosis. Routine investigations for undiagnosed liver disease should include tissue transglutaminase testing. Left untreated, coeliac-induced hepatitis may rarely progress to end-stage liver disease. Primary biliary cirrhosis is clearly linked to coeliac disease. The full story of these linkages is yet to be written.

Phylogenetic distribution of apolipoproteins A-I and E in vertebrates as determined by Western blot analysis.

A putative apolipoprotein E (apoE) has been identified in the HDL and VHDL fractions of the turtle. This observation is of particular interest considering apoE has been reported absent in the domestic hen (Hermier et al., '95; Biochim Biophys Acta: 105-118, 1995) and thus presumed absent in nonmammalian vertebrates altogether. As a result, partial amino acid sequencing of this protein was performed and revealed that one fragment shared 41% sequence identity to human apoE. Western blot analysis using antisera to apoE demonstrated cross-reactivity to a 34-kDa protein (putative apoE) in turtle plasma. Further investigation using anti-apoE antibody in Western blot analysis detected immunoreactive apoE in the plasma of lamprey, spiny dogfish, skate, and alligator, but not in flounder, newt or python; its absence in several species of birds was confirmed. Using anti-apoA-I antibody, apoA-I was detected in all vertebrate groups except a representative teleost (flounder). Apo-A-I antibody cross-reacted weakly with some putative apoE proteins (chicken, spiny dogfish and skate) and the reverse was true for anti-apoE, which cross-reacted with putative apoA-I in birds, reptiles, and elasmobranchs, confirming the molecular similarity and phylogenetic relatedness of these two proteins.

Testing for Helicobacter pylori infection: validation and diagnostic yield of a near patient test in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of a near patient test for Helicobacter pylori infection in primary care. DESIGN: Validation study performed within a randomised trial of four management strategies for dyspepsia. SETTING: 43 general practices around Nottingham. SUBJECTS: 394 patients aged 18-70 years presenting with recent onset dyspepsia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of the FlexSure test compared with an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; HM-CAP) with an identical antigen profile and with results of an earlier validation study in secondary care. Diagnostic yield of patients undergoing endoscopy on the basis of their FlexSure result compared with those of patients referred directly for endoscopy. RESULTS: When used in primary care FlexSure test had a sensitivity and specificity of 67% (95% confidence interval 59% to 75%) and 98% (95% to 99%) compared with a sensitivity and specificity of 92% (87% to 97%) and 90% (83% to 97%) when used previously in secondary care. Of the H pylori test and refer group 14% (28/199) were found to have conditions for which H pylori eradication was appropriate compared with 23% (39/170) of the group referred directly for endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: When used in primary care the sensitivity of the FlexSure test was significantly poorer than in secondary care. About a third of patients who would have benefited from H pylori eradication were not detected. Near patient tests need to be validated in primary care before they are incorporated into management policies for dyspepsia.

Protection against aspirin-induced human gastric mucosal injury by bosentan, a new endothelin-1 receptor antagonist.

BACKGROUND: Gastric ulceration induced by aspirin and by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is a major clinical problem. The mechanism of injury is unclear. There is evidence that NSAID-induced injury may cause endothelin activation. Endothelin-induced vasoconstriction has been shown to be capable of causing gastric ulceration. AIM: To investigate whether acute gastroduodenal injury induced in humans by aspirin can be prevented by the endothelin-1 antagonist, bosentan. METHODS: Eighteen healthy volunteers each received 5 x 900 mg aspirin every 12 h on three separate occasions (with either placebo, bosentan 700 mg or misoprostol 400 mg). Treatment order was randomized by Latin square design. Subjects were endoscoped and erosions counted before and 90 min after the first and last dose of aspirin. Plasma concentrations of bosentan were measured up to 5 h post-dose. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in the mean number of erosions in the aspirin plus bosentan and aspirin plus misoprostol groups after the first dose of aspirin, compared with controls (aspirin plus placebo) (P<0.05). This was not sustained after the fifth dose of aspirin in the aspirin plus placebo and aspirin plus bosentan groups, but was still present in the aspirin plus misoprostol group. The mean plasma concentration of bosentan measured 3.5 h post-dose fell from 4510 (95% CI: 2791-6230) ng/mL after the 1st dose to 2508 (95% CI: 1733-3283) ng/mL after the 5th dose (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Endothelin receptor antagonism by bosentan can protect the gastric mucosa against aspirin damage. After five doses, bosentan levels fell, possibly because of enzyme induction, and protection was no longer evident. Further investigation is needed to assess whether higher doses would be effective.

High Helicobacter pylori eradication rate with a 1-week regimen containing ranitidine bismuth citrate.

BACKGROUND: High Helicobacter pylori eradication rates have consistently been reported with 2-week dual therapy regimens of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus clarithromycin. Ranitidine bismuth citrate with two antibiotics may provide an alternative 1-week eradication regimen. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, parallel group, international, multicentre study compared ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. for 2 weeks (RC) with ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg b.d. for 1 week (RCM) for eradication of H. pylori in 350 patients with dyspepsia. RESULTS: Treatment with RC and RCM eradicated H. pylori (established by the combination of two negative results from two discrete 13C-UBTs at nominal weeks 4 and 12) from 89% (95% CI: 84-94) and 92% (95% CI: 88-97) of the observed population, and from 78% (95% CI: 72-84) and 80% (95% CI: 75-86) of the intention-to-treat population. When established only by one negative 13C-UBT result at least 28 days after the end of treatment, the respective intention-to-treat rates were 85% (95% CI: 79-90) and 88% (95% CI: 83-93). Both regimens were well-tolerated, only 6% of patients given RC and 4% given RCM discontinued treatment. Median plasma bismuth concentrations at the end of the second week of study were low, at 3.5 and 0.4 ng/ mL, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine bismuth citrate triple therapy for 1 week (RCM) and dual therapy for 2 weeks (RC) were equally effective for the eradication of H. pylori infection.

Appendicectomy, childhood hygiene, Helicobacter pylori status, and risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a case control study.

AIMS: To examine the relation between inflammatory bowel disease and appendicectomy, childhood domestic hygiene, and Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: Case control study involving 213 patients with ulcerative colitis, 110 with Crohn's disease, and 337 controls having elective surgery. RESULTS: Nine patients with ulcerative colitis (4.5%) reported a previous appendicectomy compared with 57 controls (19%) (odds ratio (OR) 0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0. 1-0.4, p<0.0001). The inverse association was unaffected by excluding operations performed after the age of onset of ulcerative colitis and was stronger for appendicectomy performed before age 20 (OR 0.14). No association with appendicectomy was found for Crohn's disease and no associations with tonsillectomy for either disease. The availability of a fixed hot water supply in early childhood (before age 11) was associated with Crohn's disease (OR for hot water not always versus always available 0.56, 95% CI 0.3-0.9, p=0. 02) but not with ulcerative colitis. No other aspect of domestic hygiene before or after age 11 was associated with either Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. Although H pylori seroprevalence was positively associated with overcrowding (p<0.001) and the absence of running hot water in childhood it was not associated with the presence of either Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis. H pylori seroprevalence was no lower in patients who had been exposed to sulphasalazine than in controls or those not exposed. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm the strong inverse association between previous appendicectomy and the development of ulcerative colitis and suggest that the protective effect is greater for appendicectomy performed in childhood.

Varying efficacy of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens: cost effectiveness study using a decision analysis model.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how small differences in the efficacy and cost of two antibiotic regimens to eradicate Helicobacter pylori can affect the overall cost effectiveness of H pylori eradication in duodenal ulcer disease. DESIGN: A decision analysis to examine the cost effectiveness of eight H pylori eradication strategies for duodenal ulcer disease with and without 13C-urea breath testing to confirm eradication. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cumulative direct treatment costs per 100 patients with duodenal ulcer disease who were positive for H pylori. RESULTS: In model 1 the strategy of omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole alone was the most cost effective of the four strategies assessed. The addition of the 13C-urea breath test and a second course of omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole achieved the highest eradication rate (97%) but was the most expensive (62.63 pounds per patient). The cost of each additional effective eradication was 589.00 pounds (incremental cost per case) when compared with the cost of treating once only with omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole; equivalent to the cost of a patient receiving ranitidine for duodenal ulcer relapse for more than 15 years. Eradication strategies of omeprazole, amoxycillin, and metronidazole were less cost effective than omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole alone. In model 2 the addition of the 13C-urea breath test after treatment, and maintenance treatment, increased the cost of all the strategies and reduced the cost advantage of omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole alone. CONCLUSION: Small differences in efficacy can influence the comparative cost effectiveness of strategies for eradicating H pylori. Of the strategies tested the most cost effective (omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole alone) was neither the least expensive (omeprazole, amoxycillin, and metronidazole alone) nor the most effective (omeprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole with further treatment for patients found positive for H pylori on 13C-urea breath testing). Cost effectiveness should be an important part of choosing an eradication strategy for H pylori.

Evaluation of a new Near Patient Test for the detection of Helicobacter pylori.

OBJECTIVE: Peptic ulcer disease is rare in the absence of Helicobacter pylori. Testing for H. pylori has recently become easier with the development of Near Patient Tests. However, the validity of many of these tests is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the QuickVue one-step Near Patient Test for H. pylori in a group of patients attending for endoscopy at a tertiary referral hospital. METHODS: In a retrospective study the QuickVue one-step serum test (Quidel) was performed on the stored serum from 193 patients whose H. pylori status had been determined by a 'gold standard' using urease testing, histology, culture and 14C-urea breath testing. Twenty four other patients presenting to endoscopy were studied prospectively. For these patients QuickVue was performed on capillary and venous samples and the results were compared to a similar 'gold standard'. Enzyme immunoassay (Premier, H. pylori, Meridian Diagnostics, OH, USA) was used to define H. pylori status of patients with indeterminate H. pylori status by the above criteria. RESULTS: In the retrospective study the QuickVue one-step H. pylori test had a sensitivity (CI) of 82% (75-89) and specificity of 83% (74-92). In the prospective study on capillary blood its sensitivity (CI) was 89% (52-100) and its specificity 93% (68-100); and on venous blood, 78% (40-97) and 93% (68-100). Premier has previously been shown to have a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. CONCLUSION: In this group of patients the QuickVue one-step H. pylori Near Patient Test was less accurate than the Premier ELISA test, but its ease of use and availability in primary care make it useful for patient screening.

Clarification of the link between polyunsaturated fatty acids and Helicobacter pylori-associated duodenal ulcer disease: a dietary intervention study.

Epidemiological evidence has suggested that the declining prevalence of duodenal ulcer disease may be attributable to rising consumption of polyunsaturated fatty acids, a hypothesis supported by in vitro evidence of toxicity of such substances to Helicobacter pylori. The objective of the present study was to establish whether this association is causal. Forty patients with proven infection with H. pylori and endoscopic evidence of past or present duodenal ulcer disease were randomized to receive either polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA group), in the form of capsules and margarine, or a placebo (control). Both groups received concurrent H2 antagonist therapy. Efficacy of therapy was determined endoscopically by assessment of ulcer healing while H. pylori status was determined by antral biopsy, urease (EC 3.5.1.5) culture and histological assessment of the severity of H. pylori infection. Antral levels of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and leukotriene B4 (LTB4) were quantified. Compliance was monitored. Before treatment, both groups were comparable for severity of H. pylori infection, smoking status and levels of LTB4 and PGE2. Despite a significant difference in consumption of linoleic acid (19.9 (SE 1.6) g for PUFA group v. 6.7 (SE 0.8) g for controls (P < 0.01) and linolenic acid (2.6 (SE 0.2) g v. 0.6 (SE 0.03) g (P < 0.01) there was no significant change in either the severity of H. pylori infection or prostaglandin levels in either group at 6 weeks. Consumption of a considerable amount of PUFA does not inhibit the colonization of the stomach by H. pylori nor does this alter the inflammatory changes characteristic of H. pylori gastritis. We conclude that the association between duodenal ulceration and a low level of dietary PUFA is likely to be spurious, probably reflecting the effect of confounding factors such as affluence, social class or smoking.

Ranitidine bismuth citrate with clarithromycin for the treatment of duodenal ulcer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate the effect of the new Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen, ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) and clarithromycin (CLAR) dual therapy, on duodenal ulcer healing and absence of ulcer recurrence during 24 weeks follow up (overall success). METHODS: Two hundred and thirty two H pylori positive patients with active duodenal ulcer received four weeks treatment with RBC 400 mg twice daily alone (RBC400) (n = 82), or RBC 400 or 800 mg twice daily co-prescribed with clarithromycin 250 mg four times daily for 14 days, followed by 14 days of RBC 400 mg twice daily alone (RBC400+CLAR and RBC 800+CLAR, respectively, n = 75 for each). RESULTS: The co-prescription regimens gave high H pylori eradication rates determined using two tests (CLOtest and 13C-urea breath test) for the presence of the organism. These rates were 92% and 81% for RBC400+CLAR (n = 62) and RBC800+CLAR (n = 63) respectively, compared with 2% for RBC400 (n = 66) (p < 0.001). With respect to overall success as estimated by life table analysis, RBC400+CLAR (89%) and RBC800+CLAR (87%) were significantly more effective than RBC400 alone (51%) (p < 0.001). All regimens were safe and well tolerated. Trough plasma bismuth concentrations at week 4 were low (treatment medians less than 6.6 ng bismuth/ml). CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine bismuth citrate is a well tolerated and efficacious ulcer healing drug which, when co-prescribed with clarithromycin, affords effective H pylori eradication therapy and prevents ulcer relapse in most patients with duodenal ulcer.

Ranitidine bismuth citrate with clarithromycin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori and for ulcer healing.

BACKGROUND: In a pilot study, ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC; Pylorid, Tritec) in coprescription with clarithromycin achieved a Helicobacter pylori eradication rate (based on 13C urea breath test alone) of 83%. The aim of the current study was to validate this finding by using three diagnostic tests and a larger group of H. pylori-positive patients with active duodenal ulcer. METHODS: In a blinded study, 95 patients were given either 4 weeks of treatment with RBC, 400 mg bid, alone (RBC400, n = 31) or RBC, 400 mg bid or 800 mg bid, in coprescription with clarithromycin, 250 mg qid for 14 days, followed by 14 days of RBC, 400 mg bid, alone (RBC400 + CLAR and RBC800 + CLAR, respectively; n = 32 for each). Rates of ulcer healing at week 4 and of H. pylori eradication (assessed by antral and corpus urease tests and histology and by 13C urea breath test) at week 8 were compared, together with the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: All three regimens were effective at duodenal ulcer healing and were tolerated well. The coprescription regimens gave significantly higher observed H. pylori eradication rates (82% and 74% for RBC400 + CLAR and RBC800 + CLAR) compared with RBC400 (0%; p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: RBC in dual therapy with clarithromycin provides excellent H. pylori eradication therapy and is an effective duodenal ulcer healing drug.

The safety and efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate in combination with antibiotics for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori.

BACKGROUND: Ranitidine bismuth citrate is a novel salt of ranitidine and a bismuth citrate complex. It has intrinsic antisecretory and anti-Helicobacter pylori activity, but monotherapy rarely eradicates H. pylori infection in man. AIM: A pilot study to investigate rates of H. pylori eradication achieved by co-prescription of ranitidine bismuth citrate with antibiotics, and to identify several regimens which would merit further investigation. METHOD: One hundred dyspeptic patients infected with H. pylori were randomly allocated to treatment with ranitidine bismuth citrate 800 mg b.d. plus either amoxycillin, metronidazole, clarithromycin, cefuroxime axetil, tetracycline, tetracycline plus metronidazole or clarithromycin plus tetracycline for 14 days. Eradication of infection was assessed using the 13C-urea breath test 4 weeks after the end of treatment. RESULTS: In a per protocol analysis eradication of H. pylori ranged between 22 and 100%; the intention-to-treat eradication rates ranged between 15 and 92%. No adverse events were specifically attributed to ranitidine bismuth citrate. CONCLUSION: Co-prescription therapy, using ranitidine bismuth citrate and one or more antibiotics, is suitable for further investigation in large-scale clinical trials in patients infected with H. pylori.