Comparison of the effect of two human milk fortifiers on clinical outcomes in premature infants.

The use of human milk fortifiers (HMF) helps to meet the high nutritional requirements of the human milk-fed premature infant. Previously available powdered products have not met the protein requirements of the preterm infant population and many neonatologists add powder protein modulars to help meet protein needs. The use of powdered products is discouraged in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) due to concern for invasive infection. The use of a commercially available acidified liquid product with higher protein content was implemented to address these two concerns. During the course of this implementation, poor growth and clinically significant acidosis of infants on Acidified Liquid HMF (ALHMF) was observed. The purpose of this study was to quantify those observations by comparing infant outcomes between groups receiving the ALHMF vs. infants receiving powdered HMF (PHMF). A retrospective chart review compared outcomes of human milk-fed premature infants<2000 g receiving the ALHMF (n=23) and the PHMF (n=46). Infant growth, enteral feeding tolerance and provision, and incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), metabolic acidosis, and diaper dermatitis were compared between the two groups. No infants were excluded from this study based on acuity. Use of ALHMF resulted in a higher incidence of metabolic acidosis (p=0.002). Growth while on HMF as measured in both g/kg/day (10.59 vs. 15.37, p<0.0001) and in g/day (23.66 vs. 31.27, p=0.0001) was slower in the ALHMF group, on increased mean cal/kg/day (128.7 vs. 117.3, p=0.13) with nearly twice as many infants on the ALHMF requiring increased fortification of enteral feedings beyond 24 cal/ounce to promote adequate growth (48% vs. 26%, p=0.10). Although we were not powered to study NEC as a primary outcome, NEC was significantly increased in the ALHMF group. (13% vs. 0%, p=0.03). Use of a LHMF in an unrestricted NICU population resulted in an increase in clinical complications within a high-acuity NICU, including metabolic acidosis and poor growth. Although further research is needed to assess outcomes among infants with a variety of clinical acuities, gestational ages, and weights to confirm these findings, based on this experience, caution is urged to avoid potential risks.

Implementation, process, and outcomes of nutrition best practices for infants <1500 g.

BACKGROUND: Extrauterine growth restriction (EUGR; weight ≤10th percentile) affects many infants ≤1500 g birth weight (BW). EUGR is associated with poor neurodevelopmental outcomes. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of optimizing nutrition administration in infants ≤1500 g. METHODS: A retrospective chart review compared infants ≤1500 g before (n = 32) and after (n = 49) implementation of nutrition practice changes designed to decrease EUGR. Changes included early aggressive parenteral nutrition (PN), early enteral feedings, trophic feedings, continuous feeding administration, protein fortification of 24-cal/oz mother's own breast milk, and development of a "feeding intolerance" algorithm. The authors evaluated demographics, growth parameters, secondary feeding, and discharge outcomes. Differences in subgroups of infants ≤1000 g and 1000-1500 g BW were assessed. RESULTS: Implementation of the nutrition practice changes decreased EUGR as defined by weight ≤10th percentile at discharge from 57% in the preimplementation group to 28% in the postimplementation group (P = .01). Weight percentile ranking at 36 weeks' gestational age increased significantly in infants 1001-1500 g, from the 13th to the 27th percentile (P = .004 and P = .01, respectively). Chronic lung disease decreased significantly (P = .02). There was no increase in necrotizing enterocolitis (6% pre vs 3% post) or in blood urea nitrogen. Days of PN and central line use were decreased (P = .02 and P = .07, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Clearly defined changes in nutrition for infants ≤1500 g significantly improved growth outcomes without increasing undesired outcomes.