Neuro-Ophthalmic Manifestations of Adult Polyglucosan Body Disease.

BACKGROUND: Adult polyglucosan body disease (APBD) is caused by a deficiency in glycogen branching enzyme that leads to polyglucosan accumulation in multiple organs. It has a progressive clinical course with prominent neurologic manifestations. We aim to describe the neuro-ophthalmic manifestations of APBD. METHODS: This is a case series of 3 individuals with genetically proven APBD. Written informed consent was provided by the brothers. We also performed a literature review on the current state of knowledge on APBD through PubMed. RESULTS: Brother 1 developed gait imbalance and length-dependent polyneuropathy in his 40s followed by progressive urinary symptoms in his 50s. He reported diplopia and blurry vision in his 60s. Neuro-ophthalmic assessment revealed bilateral optic neuropathy, convergence insufficiency, and a right fourth nerve palsy. Genetic testing showed a homozygous pathogenic variant in GBE1 c.986A>C p.Tyr329Ser. Brother 2 developed progressive urinary symptoms in his 40s that were followed by cognitive deficits, length-dependent polyneuropathy, and lower extremity weakness in his 50s and 60s. He reported blurred vision, and neuro-ophthalmic evaluation revealed bilateral optic neuropathy. Genetic testing revealed the same variant as Brother 1, GBE1 c.986A>C p.Tyr329Ser. Brother 3 developed progressive urinary urgency and lower extremity weakness in his 50s followed by a length-dependent polyneuropathy in his 60s. He reported diplopia and blurry vision in his 70s. Neuro-ophthalmic assessment revealed bilateral optic neuropathy and convergence insufficiency. Genetic testing revealed the same variant as Brothers 1 and 2, GBE1 c.986A>C p.Tyr329Ser. CONCLUSIONS: There is an array of afferent and efferent neuro-ophthalmic manifestations in APBD. Neuro-ophthalmic evaluation is crucial in evaluating and treating patients with APBD, particularly in those with visual dysfunction.

Relapsing White Matter Disease and Subclinical Optic Neuropathy: From the National Multiple Sclerosis Society Case Conference Proceedings

A 16-year-old adolescent boy presented with recurrent episodes of weakness and numbness. Brain MRI demonstrated subcortical, juxtacortical, and periventricular white matter T2 hyperintensities with gadolinium enhancement. CSF was positive for oligoclonal bands that were not present in serum. Despite treatment with steroids, IV immunoglobulins, plasmapheresis, and rituximab, he continued to have episodes of weakness and numbness and new areas of T2 hyperintensity on imaging. Neuro-ophthalmologic examination revealed a subclinical optic neuropathy with predominant involvement of the papillomacular bundle. Genetic evaluation and brain biopsy led to an unexpected diagnosis.

Eyelid retraction discomfort with cotton-tipped applicator, unimanual and speculum intravitreal injection techniques: Eyelid retraction technique randomized comparison trial (Eyelid RETRACT).

Purpose: The aim of this study was to test the discomfort experienced during intravitreal injections with eyelid retraction between an eyelid speculum, cotton-tipped applicator (CTA), and unimanual eyelid retraction techniques. Methods: In total, 99 patients receiving intravitreal bevacizumab were enrolled into this prospective study. Participants were randomized to one of the three methods, given subconjunctival 2% lidocaine and then injected in the superior temporal quadrant. Immediately after the procedure, each patient was given a visual analog scale (VAS) to rate their discomfort. Results: The mean pain scores for eyelid retraction with unimanual, CTA, and speculum groups were 0.788 (standard deviation [SD] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.448-1.128), 0.945 (SD 1.28, 95% CI 0.600-1.291), and 1.561 (SD 1.28, 95% CI 1.210-1.912), respectively. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test revealed a significant difference between the groups (P = 0.006). Post hoc analysis also revealed a difference in mean pain scores between the speculum and both the CTA and the unimanual methods. Conclusion: Our study shows that the unimanual and CTA methods for eyelid retraction are significantly less painful for patients compared to the speculum method. Patient comfort is of the utmost importance as intravitreal injections are performed millions of times a year with most patients requiring multiple injections.